Dmitry Tymchuk Brothers and sisters, after 1 September. The bad: 1. it is clear that Putin will never leave. However, if the Ukrainian Government thinks that some European leaders in appealing to settle the conflict by political means there is a sense, she is clearly mistaken. Take a political solution to the crisis can only be taking the loss, if not all, then (at first) part of the Donbass. Putin himself or through suicide would require recognition of the DNI and the LNR outside of Ukraine on the rights of the individual States. If Ukraine doesnt go for it, he is willing to accept the DNI and the LNR and as an unrecognized (or rather, only a handful of outsiders recognized with RF) para-statal entities: clearly, under the unofficial Russian protectorate. It is a variant of Transnistria and Abkhazia. With the option of some autonomous regions and other federal entities (which could, as a compromise to go to Kiev) can negotiate only as noodles on the ears of the world. Putin does not need anything under the control of Donbass to Kiev, no need to nourish illusions. So, to start negotiations with a view to the peaceful resolution of the conflict can only be mentally said goodbye to the territories now controlled by terrorists. But we all know that the LNR and DNI need only to Putin as a springboard for further rocking and exclusion from Ukraine just South and East of Ukraine. The Kremlin did not need piles of Donbass-he needs a scientific and industrial potential of Kharkiv, Dnipropetrovsk and Zaporizhia, as well as strategic (in terms of the viability of the Crimea and the connection with Transnistria, as well as take control of the whole Ukrainian coast of the Azov and Black Seas) territory in the South in the form of Odessa, Kherson and Nikolaev regions. This is the minimum programme. Where next will Moscow Moscow is still an issue. Stop this script can only force and just now. We need to understand that with all the riches of Russia as a raw material appendage of Europe, RUSSIAS military power is not unlimited — at least in terms of the so-called conventional armed forces. Zhukovsky, Russian version of Baba still; in this case, obviously, will not pass-the more Russian soldiers will return home in coffins, the stronger will knock about Putins throne. Russian propaganda TV wonderfully fires on Russian zombies only so long as they do not have to bury their children in mogilkah without labels. If I am wrong, and it is possible to solve the conflict by political means, without prejudice to the national interests of Ukraine, will be very pleased. Now, alas, I do not see reason to hope so. 2. in the context of ATO season rampant witch hunt. The public and various experts start blaming the failures guide MOD p, and GSH. The military command sees the cause of failures in the invasion of the Russian army and (yet unobtrusively) pointed out the sins of the volunteer units (mostly-uncontrollable) and lack of fighting spirit raised. The top leadership of the country promises to personnel actions in the Defense Ministry. Question: who is right? A: this is a rare case where right all. Ill start with the very unpopular with critics of an ordinary soldier, whether volunteer or raised. We find a thousand and one reasons to explain the lack of basic discipline in the ranks of our troops. These arguments sound convincing and you cannot object to them. In addition to the little things, that without discipline, no army to exist, much less successfully fighting cannot. Tested for thousands of years, you can experiment. I will answer the question: what is the fault of the soldiers? To this I answer simply. Though I have behind shoulders and journalism, Faculty of military officers service I started all the troops, with personnel. The main lesson that made: bad soldiers do not happen. But the biggest sloven really was a great fighter for command they need not just to holders of diplomas in military universities, and leading officers. They are manifested in the work. Now the question on filling: how, for example, non-commissioned officers or warrant officers, proving himself got in the rank of second lieutenant ATO? Or a big problem to amend the regulations on military service members corresponding categories for assignment to the officer ranks in the undeclared war? How many showed themselves vzvodnikov climbed the company or battalion level? But such UPS-normal practice of war, i.e. the conditions under which, in a matter of hours, any can display their best and worst qualities. Now the generals. If he is unable to cope with their duties, it must be removed from the post, as well as any other official who knowingly prosiživaet pants. Here I totally agree with Yuri Butusov, who claims that the phrase there is no substitute for an argument. Little generals and not from whom to choose? Not a problem. Here also include the principle of natural See More
Posted on: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 18:16:05 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015