END OF LIFE CARE: WHEN TO SAY STOP? The notion of medical futility... .... we struggled to define futility, then we gave up... everybody had a different idea of what was futile. Sometimes the family would insist that “everything possible” should be done, long after the doctors had concluded that there would be no benefit. Just as often doctors (usually sub-specialists with little knowledge of the patient as a whole person) would insist that technology could still prevail. The default setting became “do everything possible then we will attract the least criticism regardless of outcome”. Quite rightly, this default is being questioned. The inappropriate or unwanted use of intensive care technology at the end of life is not just ethically futile, but harmful and plain wrong. So we have to revive futility, and in doing so provide the community and our doctors with some transparent rules and guidelines about using this dangerous term. 1. The first rule is to treat everybody as an individual: just because you are 90 doesn’t mean you should not go to the ICU. There is no recipe here. 2. The second rule is that the medical team treating you needs to agree about what is medically the best option – there’s no point approaching a family when the doctors are at loggerheads. 3. Third is recognising that it is ultimately the patient’s decision, or, failing that, their family’s, about how to die. There is almost no legislation..., but the role of the patient and family is clearly spelled out. Which means there has to be a meeting, sometimes a long one. 4. Finally there has to be an option to appeal – for more time, more opinions or even to go to court. 5. But most important we need to engage the medical and broader community in a genuine conversation about managing end of life and the process of dying. Read more: smh.au/comment/when-prolonging-life-becomes-too-cruel-and-costly-20140423-zqy6e.html#ixzz2zn35yXc9
Posted on: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 08:28:49 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015