Folks - the relevance of the story on Ian Turnbull and the Senior Compliance Officer Glendon Turner is bound in the simple question - WHO owns the title to the land? And with reference to the 6 keys of control of the Aust Govt - see FLORA #24 & 26 - control of Land and its wealth is the whole focus of the corporate governments and FLORA #4 - about land ownership (in the files). Now the very first question I ask people is this - how do you own your land? The most profoundly important purchase you will ever make, the basis for all collatoral and 99.9% of people - have NO IDEA!!! Some say - freehold. Others say - Torrens Title. Both are wrong. And that means this - if you dont know how you own your land, 1. then YOU dont know WHAT you own 2. then YOU dont know WHAT is being taken off you. Is that dumb or what? The following information is with reference to the English laws under which we purchase land titles in this country. So please dont come in with the whole no-one can own land issue. Focus on what I am telling you. 1. Almighty God creates the land 2. We live on it and have access to the wealth found in and on it to provide for our lives. 3. The English monarch, held through the Covenant Oath to Almighty God holds the land in allodial title. 4. Allodial title means - without any interference whatsoever. 5. These lands are known as Crown Land. 6. The English Monarch, under Letters Patent, gives the Governor-General of the Cth of Australia, the permission to sell land titles into private hands. 7. Those Titles are lawfully sold ONLY in a Deed of a Grant in Fee Simple. 8. A Grant in Fee Simple Title is bound to Imperial measurements - acres, feet, inches, yards. 9. A Grant in Fee SImple allows for land to be used without any interference. 10. However the Monarch reserves the ability to use elements of the land as defined on the Title Deed. ie. the minerals, gravel materials, trees, etc as needed for public purposes 11. And to resume the land for public purposes at fair value. Outside of those 2 reservations - no Letters Patent has ever been issued giving government any further expanded power over private land or private land sales. 12. The first Title Deed of a Grant in Fee Simple was exchanged upon completion of the sale from Crown land to private land 13. The money went into Consolidated Revenue. 14. The Stamp Duty goes into a special fund to gather interest for the future payment of the Title re resumption. 15. Only legal tender can be used to purchase a Grant in Fee Simple Title. 16. The Title Deed carries a map of the land, defining each piece of land as unique. 17. Therefore the Title Deed is, in effect, a patent. 18. The Monarchs Seal of authority for the sale is on top of the Deed. That being the Royal Seal with the lion and the unicorn. 19. When you on-sell that land, the Monarch goes with the Deed. 20. So each sale of land titles is between a minimum of 3 people. ie. you as the seller, the other person as the buyer, the Monarch as part of the Title. Notice - there is not one other person from government involved in that exchange. The ONLY role of govt is as the agents in the original sale. After that - they have no role whatsoever, except for the collection of stamp duty on the sale. What rights are inherent in a purchase of a Grant in Fee Simple Title? 21. 4 elements of land use a). Tenements - meaning YOU buy any structures on the land - houses, fences, shed, etc b). Messuages - meaning YOU buy the right to build any structures on the land - houses, fences, shed, etc c). Corporeal Hereditaments - meaning YOU buy the natural elements of the land - the rocks, trees, any native animal, etc Note - the animals have the right to leave and you cannot stop them and water cannot be owned as it is a moveable object. You can contain rain water in dams, but you cannot contain a creek or river or such. You can simply use both while they are on your land. d). Incorporeal Hereditaments - meaning YOU buy the right to USE the land in any capacity you wish, even to the extent of turning the land into waste - a legal term meaning take it to bedrock. Note - this does not mean you can start a business that might cause harm to the quiet enjoyment of your neighbours property through noise or sewerage run-off or whatever. 22. Those rights extend below the top of the land to the centre of the earth and as high as your eye can see and further above the top of the land. 23. The new owner is referred to as a Proprietor, because they are now the activator of the rights inherent in the Title. They run the Title on that specific land. 24. ALL relevant High Court cases from before 2000 support this meaning of a Grant in Fee Simple. 25. Several American cases have validated the extent of the depth and height of land proprietorship. 26. No proprietor can sell only part of a Grant in Fee Simple Title. By that I mean, they cannot sell only the land but not the house. Or the house but not the land. Even the Aust Tax Act states that they are as one. 27. The Grant in Fee Simple Title is bound to the land itself. it is sold in entirety with the land. 28. Land sold with 1 or more of the 4 inherent rights removed is NOT sold in a Grant in Fee Simple Title. 29. Land in the Cth of Aust can ONLY be sold with those 4 rights. 30. Any land Title sold without being a Grant in Fee Simple Title is fraudulent Now pause here folks and re-read that information. The Title you buy is a legal instrument in capacity of as much power as the Cth Constitution. And it is controlled not by you, not by the govt, but by the Monarch. Freehold Title - what is it? 1. The colloquial reference to a Grant in Fee Simple Title. 2. However the term holds no rights described. 3. So to use it is dangerous. Torrens Title - what is it? 1. A DEED is the only lawful way to prove your ownership. 2. Title deeds are documents that show ownership, as well as rights, obligations, or mortgages on a property. 3. Deeds are created on vellum or such for long-term protection - but the are still subject to fires, theft, etc. Or some necessary information may not have been written on them. 4. Without the Deed or the restrictions on the deed, you have no lawful proof of ownership. 5. in 1862, Sir Richard Torrens, the S.A. Registrar-General and brought in a system of title protection called the Torrens Title. 6. It went like this - a) Government held the registry of activity on land. b)YOU bought the land title c) YOU paid your money and claimed your deed. d) YOU registered that new proprietory ownership to that particular land title. e) any mortgagee or caveat holder could do the same. f) a potential land title purchaser could examine the registry and be informed of every element that was involved or could interfere with a purchase. Now take very careful note of that information. YOU can NOT buy land under a Torrens Title in this country. Torrens Title simple means that all the legal details of that land Title have been registered and therefore are recorded. Can the government lodge legal things on your land through Torrens Title? No. Can someone buy land in Torrens Title? No. Torrens Title is simply a documented list of the legal actions that are attached to a particular parcel of land. So lets establish a three key points here. 1. Mining companies DO NOT HAVE ANY POWER OVER YOUR LAND WITHOUT YOUR PERMISSION. They have the right to use the Monarchs mineral reservations on the Title Deed but ONLY in agreement with you. 2. Inside the boundaries of the land, under and above, as defined in Imperial measurements - YOU are the King and the lawmaker of all who enter, unless they have the authority of the Monarch to do so under specific warrant - and that only in a criminal matter - never for legislative purposes. 3. Inside the boundaries of the land, under and above, as defined in Imperial measurements - YOU hold the right to use the land and ALL elements on that land, without interference. 4. If government want any part of your land, they can do so ONLY - a) with your agreement b) under authority from the Monarch c) having made full payment to you first. And by part I do not mean they can remove an element of the title - but they must buy the actual title as it cannot be split. For to split it breaks the title. Which can not be done. How then have Government claimed the power OVER your land title purchase that has brought us to the current situation of the death of this compliance officer? 1. As discussed, the inception of metric measurements removed Imperial measurements. OUR lawful land titles are only in Imperial. 2. The Australian Government was created without the authority of the constitutional Monarch, so the holder of the allodial title is non-existent in their corporate structure. 3. There was no legal tender to purchase land titles. 4. As land was sold, all Title Deeds were gathered and archived by the Aust Govt. In effect, you have not paid lawfully for anything, therefore you have bought nothing. Now you will tell me, I own the land I live on - I am paying for it - my name is on the rate notice. What you are saying is crazy! Do you have a Title Deed? No - you have a Certificate of Title. Show me anywhere in the Real Property Act or a Letters Patent where a Certificate of Title carries ANY lawful weight. Does that Certificate of Title have a map defining the boundaries of your purchase? No. Then how can you tell me where it starts and ends? Does that Certificate of Title have the Seal of Authority for a complete sale of Real Property at the top? No. Then whose seal does it have? The State. Show me where in law, the state can claim to be the co-proprietor of land they were never given in allodial title ownership. Did you pay real money - legal tender - for that land title? No. Then you havent actually completed a lawful sale for real property anyway then, have you? Did that money you did pay go into Consolidated Revenue with the Stamp Duty going into the special fund? Dont be silly. Neither of those funds exist in the treasury of the Aust Govt! So what exactly have you bought then folks???? Well considering the Aust Govt holds ALL the Deeds for Real Property in this country this is exactly what you have bought - 1. A Certificate of Title establishing that you are now in the Torrens Title registry as the current user of the land owned by another. 2. A contract that makes you liable for rental on that property - rates, etc 3. A contract that tells you exactly what you can and cannot do on that land - remember I stated way up above the proprietor of the Title is the King and the lawmaker of all who enter So who gave the Aust Govt permission to keep our Deeds and set up this fraudulent rental scheme?? No - one. Thats the whole point of David Walters work and Criminal Complaints to every court available to us all. No-one gave them permission. The men and women of the Australian Government and its co-governments in the State - are pirates. They STOLE the rights to do so. About time we stole it back folks. And here is some reference for you - Torrens Title in each state lexisweb.lexisnexis.au/Practical-Guidance-Topic.aspx?tid=1091 Finally, here is a copy of the NSW Crown Lands Alienation Act 1861 - personally created by Queen Victoria herself - NOT her Parliament. Notice - on the very first page - Crown Lands - All Lands vested in Her Majesty which have not been dedicated to any public purpose or which have not been granted or lawfully contracted to be granted in fee simple. Crown Land is land that has NOT been contracted out in fee simple. The job of a lawful govt is to administer to the Monarchs land - that being Crown land. Crown land is NOT fee simple land - so folks - any ability of any government in this country to touch, enter, make and enforce legislation over that land title is non-existent. There in is the core of the situation with Ian Turnbull - an 89 year old gentlemen who was pushed to the edge by a criminal act and is now going to be judged by those who created the situation. Where in all that do you think he will find justice? Glendon Turner was a senior compliance officer. The word compliance means to so as you are commanded, submit, bend over. I have met several compliance officers - their attitude is always, we are right, do as you are told or suffer the consequences. As a SENIOR compliance officer, Mr Turner had established he was good at his job - making people comply. Mr Turnbull had been forced to comply to the tune of $400,000 for acting in right of ownership on what HE thought was HIS property. Do I have any sympathy for the dead fellow? As a living, breathing man with a family - yes - a great deal. As an entity getting paid to harm a living men by the criminal cartel he worked for - no. But I will tell you this. The people that should be on trial for murder - are his bosses. Because THEY orchestrated this situation. Turner got well paid for pushing another living man to the edge. And his bosses rewarded him for doing just that. Ian Turnbull was simply defending himself against a criminal invasion. Might be your turn next.
Posted on: Thu, 07 Aug 2014 23:17:55 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015