Heres an angle on the Lobby Lobby case I havent heard before: At the heart of this, what you have is, you have Hobby Lobby saying, “We’re a corporation but we’re a devout Christian corporation. … If you follow that rationale, the separateness that usually distinguishes the owner of the corporation from the corporation [itself] is then destroyed. … [So] If this thing passes, you’re going to see me suing corporations, saying there’s no distinction between your owner and you — so you, Mr. Green, who owns Hobby Lobby, I’m going to bring you into the case, and you’re not going to have any separate protection, any indemnification between you and your corporation. Any thoughts on this?
Posted on: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 00:49:26 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015