I try to watch hanible lector, but I cant stand either of the main - TopicsExpress



          

I try to watch hanible lector, but I cant stand either of the main characters or the writing...I like mercy to a degree...I was enjoying jeckle and I really like bates motel...Vikings is really good and I dont like dracula that much...but I always like one or two characters and something about the idea...force of image and mimickery...the curvature accelerations...form as substance and force..creation, protection and destruction...simply an image can be so real...the voices in my head...even just the image creates a reflex response...unable to treat it as false...maybe theyre false to the point of form an solidity...with their own method of self protection...negative reality with the same or similar characteristics of reality..past some neutrality...image as form and form as substantial with force and protection...perhaps the images are far from protected, far from substantial, yet having force..perhaps they rely on a parasitic method...maybe they are neutral...the way neutral creates a similarity to polar opposite..the middle is male with two types of female, but neutral takes on polar elements by it positioning where the male is supposed to be...when all of neutral is considered still...all one thing...one homogenous neutrality...a scatterpositioning causing an exchange of centricity...an inertial frame of reference on the front of change...neutral gains commonality, consistency, when it is nothing but unbounded and meaningless variation said to be homogenous...saying and displacement...algebraic displacement...definition displacement...logical displacement and perceptual spaces...mapping theory...emerging definition...lodging... catching... merging... differentiating...nebulous definition and extension contradiction...from nebulous thought to generalization...having sufficient indicators, enough clues to do derivation...elemental emerging algebraic functions...contrasting stillness and decontrasting change...logarithmic leap and exponentiative reduction...formed in such a way that the preceding element results...and agreement...a logarithmic series by inductive method...such that such that such that and ambiguity...multiple solutions, interpretation and distribution of necessary causal formula ambiguity...so what does any of that having to do with pseudo-polar neutrality...what is this idea about homogeneous commonality by scatter perspective...to take on all the the variation...in logical mathematical terms what takes on the variation of unbounded laziness, such that neutrality results..pletely lazy unbounded growth...parasitic method...what tales on the variation and maintains the commonality...if neutral is not the middle...but is the outers where the middle should be...right deepening method...the outers dont grow outwardly, the middle deepens, if the middle doesnt deepen the outers wind up in the middle...the outer can grow in unbounded laziness...formlessness of a point of no size without embedding...embedding ambiguity...number of solutions and framing... an inductive series of solution...countable...neutral and these unbounded outers...what takes up the variation...neutral as lazy...without force or substance...metapositioning and parapositioning...causal formula that doesnt show up in manifestation... metapositioned...geometric relationships between metaposed states..perhaps a preuclidean or post euclidean geometric relationship...simultaneous state concurrently existent with nothingnesss existence...simultaneous states related by geometry without extention...neither endospanse or exospanse...how to define these preeuclidean and post euclidean spaces? Space formed in such a way that extension can results upon completion of a countably finite series...why would endospanseand expspanse require a countable infinite series...I see these culminations all the time...often a complete countable infinite series...a finite infinity...will allow a special from to come into existence...special forms at the beginning, at the end and at the center...usually having some ironic formulation...extensions contradictory nature and a series of acceptable ironies before the paradox, upon paradox there is unity with the beginning, or the center, and a resolving irony...a reciprocal irony that solves the contradiction..special cases and contradiction...special cases an definition...neutral as a homogenous scatterspace by loss of definition...elements of definition...formulation and formation..causal formula...the idea of preextended spaces, even post extended spaces...extension taken out of the water and contrasted in a new way..by a new dispersed space...meaning and definition..acclimation and deacclimation...deacclimated contrast and deacclimated homogeny and an acclimated contrast and homogeny...negative negativity and the forth quadrents ambiguity..pounding homogeny and compounding deacclimation...de (climatation) a (climation) and climation...exoalignment...scattered unity reformed at the center...Im working by combining terms in various way, cross referencing and doing all the derivation and theoromatic formulation...recurring forms and general theoroms...relating things by analogous parapositioning and metapositioning...morphic analysis...deepening by increasing the number of perspectives...the number of morphic variants revealing new aspects and perspectives and ever deepening comprehension...with deepening harminic structure and clarified modular passages...i need to establish the outer octave and then I can look within the inward octaves like swimming...like eating a grilled cheese with the crusts already eaten...nothing but soft toasted bread and melted cheese at that point...
Posted on: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 20:47:16 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015