In Regards to Alleged Charges of ‘Identity Theft’? If you are - TopicsExpress



          

In Regards to Alleged Charges of ‘Identity Theft’? If you are harassed and violated and allegedly charged with alleged “Identity Theft’, as some of these unlawful tribunals and quasi-national, municipal domiciles and their private employees and hired mercenaries are perpetrating at this time. Please note that there must be a person of which you have stolen identity from and the person must present themselves as the injured party to which you have stolen identity from. The transmitting utility name issued on the birth certificate IS NOT a flesh and blood being, and if t is presumed by them to be you, then how is it possible to commit “Identity Theft” just because you corrected or changed the name, which is perfectly lawful and legal? The birth certificate construct and artificial beings is what they are dealing with as human property, chattel property for the corporation and a member / citizen of the corporation as that is all that a corporation can deal with. In reality this is direct proof that these procedures are proof of a sick mind and are absolutely absurdity. Pursuant to the Law of the Land — the Constitution, authorized by the People FOR the occupying United States of America (Union States), wherein that same constitution protects you, the natural people from being molested from them, from other citizens, from anyone, provided YOU enforce it, particularly against those who violate it against you. In Amendment V, it states that …’no one can be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation…Your Nationality cards are your private property! We can fix this if we would just get to thinking! The Following Is a Public Announcement: NOTICE TO ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT: [NATIONALS OR CITIZENS] ARE NOT REQUIRED TO SHOW IDENTIFICATION TO A POLICE OFFICER The Police Officer swears and or Oaths upon the American Constitution as an Officer of Law. Supreme Court Decisions are recognitions of Res Judicata, which exist already as Secured Rights that cannot be liened upon, therefore are inalienable / unalienable. SUPREME COURT CASE: Kolender v. Lawson (461 U.S. 352, 1983) in which the United States Supreme Court ruled that a police officer could not arrest a citizen merely for refusing to present identification. There is no such thing as “FAILURE TO IDENTIFY”. You can Sue the Police for an illegal Arrest. Showing identification is a courtesy and they (police officers) CANNOT determine if your ID is valid or not, as they usually predicate the validity of an identification on whether or not it was issued by the corporation they work for. However corporations CANNOT issue lawful identification to a flesh and blood natural being. Therefore Declaring your status is to be clear about these matters. The courts are not bound by an officers interpretation of the law under which he presumes to act. Hoffsomer v. Hayes, 92 Okla 32, 227 F. 417
Posted on: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 23:12:57 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015