It is this writers analysis that given the information referenced in this paper the Paramount question is: Where is the real evidence, a lawful delegation of authority order granting the “company/agent” authority to make any legal or lawful determination on behalf of “the people of the ___”/non-company-members? Was authority including lands assigned, granted, conveyed with proper records of this event, when a question is stated in the positive tense the private nation making the claim has the burden to prove that they did not grant such power or surrender interests in the lands or more importantly our blood relation, the Indian nations would have to discover evidence to bring proof of this claim. However with the early record keeping practices and the years of theft of the many records from raids of the Indian council chambers and record custodians, this realization and above question must be brought to attention by bringing this statement as formed in the negative tense to assert the positive as rephrased below: It is fact that we have no record or evidence that any lawful delegation of authority including the lands granting the “company” an order of authority to make specific legal or lawful determination on behalf of “the people of the ___”, and we believe no such evidence exists. If you have real evidence that the statement herein is in err, provide corrections for the record, otherwise the record stands as stated herein. The power of this statement not only comes from the usurper having to admit and correct the record but to exclude and vacate the presumptions of good faith. he must prove that authority was either delegated lawfully or the private Indian nations constitutions and lands have been usurped without delegation of authority; an act of constitutional vandalism, treason, misrepresentation, continental and spiritual warfare, abduction, hidden enslavement and influence of the mind: If proof of delegation of authority exits and the “company” produces a document they admit to agent status, showing that we can upgrade or downgrade the delegated mandate. If they do not have proof of delegation of authority they have acted in conflict of law, and acting outside the scope of their offices, showing that the Indian nations have been wronged by; constitutional vandalism, treason, misrepresentation, continental and spiritual warfare, abduction, hidden enslavement and influence of the mind:. Until the question of delegation of authority including land can be answered in favor of the “company” the content in this review should remain foreign and separate from the nature and fundamental constitution of the private Indian nations.
Posted on: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 05:52:55 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015