MY CHILDREN forced eight months now from their primary attachment - TopicsExpress



          

MY CHILDREN forced eight months now from their primary attachment parent - I had them 5 days per week and was with them daily since birth.. The more traumatic the separation, the more likely there will be significant negative developmental consequences. Repeated separations interfere with the development of healthy attachments and a childs ability and willingness to enter into intimate relationships in the future. Children who have suffered traumatic separations from their parents may also display low self-esteem, a general distrust of others, mood disorders (including depression and anxiety), socio-moral immaturity, and inadequate social skills. ... Another mom in my situation is ahead of me in filing a law suit for damages - sound familiar? NATURE OF THE CASE 49. The plaintiff alleges that she has suffered multiple deprivations of her constitutional rights as follows: a. Deprivation of fundamental right to care, custody, and management of three minor children, without due process of law, in violation of the First, Fifth, Eighth, and Ninth amendments to the federal constitution, in that she was denied all access to her children secondary to unlawful conditions being placed on her access by persons acting under color of law. 12 c. Deprivation of the right to due process of law, in violation of the Fourteenth amendment to the federal constitution, in that she was deprived of assets, income and child custody secondary to ex parte hearings, conferences, and orders. d. Deprivation of the right to due process of law, in violation of the Fourteenth amendment to the federal constitution, in that she was denied meaningful access the court when she was denied reasonable accommodations pursuant to the American With Disabilities Act of 1990, as amended by the ADAAA of 2008, by persons acting under color of law. e. Deprivation of equal protection of the laws, in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth amendment to the federal constitution, in that, based on her status as a disabled person, laws and procedures fair on their face were administered with an evil eye and heavy hand, by persons acting under color of law. f. Plaintiff was coerced to sign documents that impinge her fundamental rights with the threat of incarceration and loss of liberty. g. Plaintiff minors have been denied fundamental rights of familial access, subjected to severe emotional duress and physical abuse. h. Plaintiff has been denied income and assets by persons acting under the color of law. 50. In addition to the federal claims, the plaintiff also states the following substantially related claims: a. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress, in that the named defendants committed the violations outlined above, and knew or should have known that the plaintiff would suffer severe emotional distress as a consequence to their activities. That is a sneak peek at what Ill be working on next year ...love this women and getting support! Tired of the whole thing but not given a choice at this point. God has his own plan..
Posted on: Sun, 09 Mar 2014 03:04:20 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015