Mark Petzold to Kevin, Here we go again. I will type slow. Try to keep up as I address your points. 1. We thought it was no coincidence that Inhulsen was given Crystals number hence one of the reasons we kept the message. We felt that is one of the questions to beg.... How did Inhulsen get Crystals number? Its seems odd that the GOP would give anyones number to an irate person. Also, consider that Inhulsens call to Crystal was the ONLY call she received intended for David wells. Everyone knows the GOP likes to make calls where were the wrong numbers. Plus David was very active in the GOP. (Im going to type in caps so maybe, just maybe you will get the point.). YOUR KEY POINT THAT WE CONSPIRED MONTHS AGO, KNOWING THAT DAVE WOULD INSIGHT INHULSEN OR ANYONE ELSE TO CALL AND LEAVE A PSYCHOTIC MESSAGE ON CRYSTALS PHONE IS WEAK, PATHETIC, AND MOST OF ALL REVEALING. YOUR STRETCHING HERE IS NOT ONLY EMBARRASSING YOURSELF BUT ALSO INHULSEN. I hope you are not clearing your talking points with Inhulsen because he does have an impressive resume as a lawyer and this does not represent him well at all. 2. We are Tea Partiers. This year has not been a good year for relations between the establishment and the tea party. Delegates purged ect. I would have thought youd have known that fact. We are in a culture war. Our fellow citizens need to see the character of those in Republican leadership. There are far too many people putting trust in un-virtuous leaders, mostly because they dont know. I am trying to fix that. Maybe you remember a quote from the tea party meetings you attended back in the day. Remember? Back when you were a right ring extremist? Back when you were accepted for your knowledge and before your character was fully on display? Heres the quote. Educate and inform the whole of the masses, for that is the only sure way to preserve Liberty. Thomas Jefferson. Ok Kevin... I am typing slow. Try to keep up. That is why we held on to this video. 3. I need to make this a separate point even if its closely related to point #2, but Ive seen Beckering comment regarding a lack of challenger, so Im hoping that maybe he will understand. Yes, it would have been nice to have a challenger but control is not the primary concern. Education is the primary concern, politics is down the priority list and is an outcome of our efforts. The root cause of our problem is not the wrong men in office. The root cause is the people are not informed and are not moral. Too many people take the false pretense that a corrupt republican will give them financial security. Putting weak, corrupt men in power in hopes of security IS trading Liberty for security. They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” ”Those Who Sacrifice Liberty For Security Deserve Neither.” Ben Franklin. Few men have virtue enough to withstand the highest bidder. George Washington. Pride goes before destruction, a haughty spirit before a fall. Better to be lowly in spirit and among the oppressed than to share plunder with the proud. Proverbs 16:18-19 4. Holding on to this video provided a test for Inhulsen. He could have shown character by reaching out to those effected by his actions. Rather, he said that he had a bad day. Explained his wife saw Daves comments and called him at work. BTW, stop the Dave attacked Inhulsens wife narrative its embarrassing. The voicemail never mentions Dave attacking Inhulsens wife. It was all about Inhulsen. Back to my point. Inhulsen could have said that he will reach out to all members of the kent GOP. He could have shown real leadership, rather he continued just as he said he would in the voice mail (he just apologized for making) and attacked Dave. You ever stop to think that maybe Dave did not produce the YouTube video and the email message? Did Inhulsen act out again in arrogance and rage? 5. Inhulsen was unable to address Crystal after the convention. There was time when she approached him that he could have addressed his actions in a humble contrite way. It didnt happen. Kevin, I am going to say again, bring proof if Crystal or I for that matter did something wrong. Ironically, You are attacking MY wife. Cant you see that or dont you care? What is your motivation? For example, It would be a reasonable statement of opinion to say she should have deleted the message. But she did nothing wrong in holding on to it. She did nothing wrong in confronting Inhulsen. What did she do? Ive stated why I spend so much of my time and resources fighting as a Tea Partier ect. I dont expect you to understand, because what we do takes sacrifice. Why do you do what you do? I wouldnt respond to your message accept there are people that dont know you. Im hoping that people will see your true colors and do not get sucked in to your future ventures. You write well. You know a lot about history and civics but you are a working professional in the worlds second oldest profession. Thats all Im going to say about that. BTW, I strive to be a moderate just like our founders. You may remember Kevin, its called peoples law. Right in the middle between Liberty and Tyranny. Dig out the material and refresh yourself would ya please. Thank you.
Posted on: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 14:12:31 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015