Monsanto at it again. More Like This: Trending Now by Carey - TopicsExpress



          

Monsanto at it again. More Like This: Trending Now by Carey Gillam (Reuters) — Mon­santo Co. on Mon­day won another round in a legal bat­tle with U.S. organic grow­ers as an appeals court threw out the grow­ers’ efforts to stop the com­pany from suing farm­ers if traces of its patented biotech genes are found in crops. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fed­eral Cir­cuit affirmed a pre­vi­ous rul­ing that found organic grow­ers had no rea­son to try to block Mon­santo from suing them as the com­pany had pledged it would not take them to court if biotech crops acci­den­tally mix in with organics. Organic farm­ers and oth­ers have wor­ried for years that they will be sued by Mon­santo for patent infringe­ment if their crops get con­t­a­m­i­nated with Mon­santo biotech crops. In its rul­ing Mon­day, the appel­late court said the organic grow­ers must rely on Mon­santo assur­ances on the company’s web­site that it will not sue them so long as the mix is very slight. “Monsanto’s bind­ing rep­re­sen­ta­tions remove any risk of suit against the appel­lants as users or sell­ers of trace amounts (less than one per­cent) of mod­i­fied seed,” the court stated in its ruling. Mon­santo offi­cials applauded the ruling. “The asser­tion that Mon­santo would pur­sue patent infringe­ment against farm­ers that have no inter­est in using the company’s patented seed tech­nol­ogy was hypo­thet­i­cal from the out­set,” the com­pany said in a state­ment issued Monday. Mon­santo has devel­oped a rep­u­ta­tion for zeal­ously defend­ing patents on its genet­i­cally altered crops, which include patented “Roundup Ready” soy­beans, corn and cot­ton, genet­i­cally altered to tol­er­ate treat­ments of its Roundup weedkiller. The crops are widely used in the United States and Latin Amer­ica. It has proven dif­fi­cult to keep the genetic alter­ation from con­t­a­m­i­nat­ing non-biotech crops, as recently occurred in a wheat field in the U.S. state of Oregon. The group of more than 50 organic farm­ers and seed deal­ers sued Mon­santo in March 2011 seek­ing to pro­hibit Mon­santo from suing them if their seed and crops become contaminated. Mon­santo offi­cials specif­i­cally refused to sign a covenant stat­ing it would not sue the grow­ers, but the court said the web­site state­ment was suf­fi­cient and would be binding. Andrew Kim­brell, a lawyer with the Cen­ter for Food Safety, which joined as a plain­tiff in the law­suit, said the deci­sion made no sense. “It is a very bizarre rul­ing that relies on a para­graph on a web­site,” he said. “It is a very real threat to Amer­i­can farm­ers. This is def­i­nitely appealable.” In its rul­ing Mon­day, the court noted that records indi­cate a large major­ity of con­ven­tional seed sam­ples have become con­t­a­m­i­nated by Monsanto’s Roundup resis­tance trait. Mon­santo filed 144 patent-infringement law­suits against farm­ers between 1997 and April 2010, and won judg­ments against farm­ers it said made use of its seed with­out pay­ing required royalties. Many U.S. farm­ers have said their fields were inad­ver­tently con­t­a­m­i­nated with Monsanto’s biotech seeds with­out their knowl­edge. The issue has been a topic of con­cern for not only farm­ers, but also com­pa­nies that clean and han­dle seed.
Posted on: Sun, 23 Jun 2013 03:51:48 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015