NO LENINIST PARTY IS COMMUNIST PARTY -Shah Alam A book, published by the ICWF, @ icwfreedom.org . ( Continuation from yesterday ) [ 18 ] A Communist party has acknowledged that the colonial policy was the integral part of capitalist development by defeating the self-defendant but so poor local economy. Thus, colonial policy was a progressive policy, has practiced by the revolutionary capitalist class. Sure, the colonial policy has lost its utility when the capitalism has become old thereby, the reactionary capitalist class has ended the practice of the said policy by founding the some global authorities including the IMF to serve the capitalist interest globally. Therefore, there are so many new states has founded but not out of control of the IMF and other global authorities by the effect of ending the practice of colonial policy. Noted, founding members of the IMF were 51 including British ruled India, but now 198. But, Leninist parties are against colonial policy by practicing the politics of so-called self-determination right of nations. Therefore, Leninist parties has been taking even the side of the reactionary forces, defeated by the revolutionary capitalist class to fight against the colonial rulers by declaring the country of the colonial rulers as enemy of national development by denying the historical facts of capitalist development by the manufacturing such fabricated and false stories about the past and so-called independent national economy under the global net of capitalism. Noted, the communist manifesto has described as is: “The need of a constantly expanding market for its products chases the bourgeoisie over the entire surface of the globe. It must nestle everywhere, settle everywhere, and establish connections everywhere. The bourgeoisie has through its exploitation of the world market given a cosmopolitan character to production and consumption in every country. To the great chagrin of reactionists, it has drawn from under the feet of industry the national ground on which it stood. All old-established national industries have been destroyed or are daily being destroyed. They are dislodged by new industries, whose introduction becomes a life and death question for all civilised nations, by industries that no longer work up indigenous raw material, but raw material drawn from the remotest zones; industries whose products are consumed, not only at home, but in every quarter of the globe. In place of the old wants, satisfied by the production of the country, we find new wants, requiring for their satisfaction the products of distant lands and climes. In place of the old local and national seclusion and self-sufficiency, we have intercourse in every direction, universal inter-dependence of nations. And as in material, so also in intellectual production. The intellectual creations of individual nations become common property. National one-sidedness and narrow-mindedness become more and more impossible, and from the numerous national and local literatures, there arises a world literature. The bourgeoisie, by the rapid improvement of all instruments of production, by the immensely facilitated means of communication, draws all, even the most barbarian, nations into civilisation. The cheap prices of commodities are the heavy artillery with which it batters down all Chinese walls, with which it forces the barbarians’ intensely obstinate hatred of foreigners to capitulate. It compels all nations, on pain of extinction, to adopt the bourgeois mode of production; it compels them to introduce what it calls civilisation into their midst, i.e., to become bourgeois themselves. In one word, it creates a world after its own image.” Therefore, the revolutionary practice of the colonial policy by the revolutionary capitalist class has made the capitalist world by defeating all backward and local but poor economic systems. No doubt, defeat of local and backward economy along with privileged and beneficiaries from the mentioned defeated economies was quite normal and natural by the advanced capitalist economy and revolutionary capitalist class. But, Leninist parties has been ignoring the communist manifesto to deny the historical facts to ignore the range of capitalist society and the conditions of nations under the global net of capitalist society. Therefore, Leninist parties has been creating wrong concept, false ideas, and misunderstanding about the capitalist society to hide the exploitation of local or native capitalist to serve the moribund capitalism. Thus, Leninist parties are working against working class. So, no Leninist party is communist party. ( Will continue )
Posted on: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 16:29:44 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015