PAF and IAF have evolved over such different paths, only good - TopicsExpress



          

PAF and IAF have evolved over such different paths, only good enough comparison is that the one focused on the offensive will prove more successful! Pakistan will definitely focus on the enemys oil supply. The one attacking first is going to have a clear cut advantage though! Pak Army Armor is on average closer to the enemy and thus will definitely have an initial advantage. Symmetric or Asymmetric, any analysis comes up to the same 65 / kargil style result: we manage to take a good chunk of territory before we succumb to a naval blockade. Issues that will make a difference, 1. Can we destroy their ability to trade by sea? if yes, they HAVE to convince us to trade with them! India is one of those countries that will have to let go of their ego should they loose their ability to trade by sea. 2. How far can our armor penetrate before being detected (theirs if they r on the offensive)? under the cover of the night and the river (river bed: jhelum: amphibious tanks). The answer could decide the liberation of Kashmir! 3. How many sorties to take out their refineries / sea ports? That will decide who looses war stamina first. How much will the Taftan route bail us out? How much can our navy defer the blockade? Most of all, will the Pakis dare attack BEFORE the indians become confident they can intercept Pak NDVs?!?! ;) https://facebook/photo.php?v=651983141532106
Posted on: Sat, 09 Aug 2014 18:24:48 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015