Part 15 On September 22nd, we went to court again. This was - TopicsExpress



          

Part 15 On September 22nd, we went to court again. This was supposed to be the start of the trial proceedings. Weeks before court, I had asked David Crosby to excuse himself from my case. After all, I had to use him during the first case involving my sons, I wasn’t about to get railroaded by his services again. He filed a motion and was dismissed from my case. The weekend before court, I had sent this letter off to the Attorney General, Joseph Polette, and the head prosecutor in Hillsboro. I need people to be aware of what is going on in our county. My letter was submitted by Melissa Perris to Judge Missey as evidence. Judge Missey read it an became enraged. He refused to let me have a different attorney. According to Missey, when he assigns you a public defender, you have to use David Crosby. Why is that? Why can’t people fill out the application and get assigned a public defender the proper way? What is the point of Missey’s bailiff giving you a form for a public defender if he’s just going to assign David Crosby to your case anyways? Missey read the part of my letter about tampered evidence and made the statement “Ms. Rohloff, how do you know that I knew these photo’s were tampered with?” Isn’t that an admission of guilt right there? That’s what I took it as. My fiancé sent the tampered photographs to a friend of ours that graduated from UMSL with a master’s degree in Art and Art/History. She confirmed that they were tampered with. We also ran the pictures through a program that we have on our home computer and were able to revert the pictures back to what they were supposed to look like. As I explained to Missey about what we discovered about the pictures, and was in the process of taking my evidence out of my bag, Chad Evans, foster parent, was sitting behind me, scoffing and smirking. His smirk was quickly erased from his face after he saw me take my evidence out of the bag. I guess that answers my question as to who tampered with the photographs. Missey went on a 5 minute rampage about how he spent a year of his life, making his family miserable, in order to make sure that there wasn’t any “shenanigan’s” going on in his courtroom, threw a temper tantrum, and disqualified himself from the case and stormed out of the courtroom. Now I ask, if someone is in your courtroom, telling you that they can prove fraud and that evidence was tampered with, do you go on a 5 minute rampage and throw a temper tantrum or do you open an investigation and get to the bottom of things? I would think that an investigation would be opened but Missey doing what he did confirmed my suspicions even more. Fraud has been committed and now Missey is the only person that has plausible deniability.
Posted on: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 22:51:08 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015