People tend to be more afraid of being wrong than concerned about being IN THE RIGHT, if you know what I mean? I have no problem being wrong, in fact, I greatly appreciate knowing when I have yet to uncover the truth on an issue. Im a truth seeker. I want to peel away any misinformation I have, leave all biases far behind in the dust of shameful delusion, and get straight to the TRUTH. I want to conform to the truth, not corrupt the truth to fit my agenda. I have invested a great many hours into researching vaccines from all viewpoints, with an open mind, and I am CERTAIN that there is a horrid truth buried under the quaint, albeit severely misinformed, socialist sentiment supporting vaccines. All I ask of you, all of you, is to SERIOUSLY research vaccines, with an open mind, simply shedding all preconcieved notions, and with an unbiased fervor for the TRUTH. Inventing the latest vaccine cocktail is a booming business and is propelled by the patenting system. Anyone not familiar with the patent system will be unnerved to find out that each new vaccine is patented for 10 or 15 years in which time their profits are maximized. After they reach their height in profit generation, their profits begin to teeter off, unless of course a new and improved version of the vaccine is invented. Just some final food for thought. Always follow the money. (read: incentive) Who profits from vaccines? Who funded the studies that pro-vaccine proponents point to? Who stands to lose money if people learned the truth about vaccines? Look into those things. On the other hand...who profits from NOT being vaccinated? Nobody does. There is no incentive for corruption or agendas on the side of those who simply want to be good stewards of their bodies, know the truth, and make sure they arent putting themselves and their children at risk. The incentives FOR vaccination are great and many with population control at the rotten core. The incentives AGAINST vaccinations are simply to know the truth and protect ones self and loved ones. Apply the common concept of the preponderance of evidence. This means the greatest amount of evidence. Which view point has the greatest amount of evidence in its favor? Evidence is such a subjective thing, though, as it is often tainted, if not completely fabricated. To that end, and as a means of quality control, when considering evidence, I also look for what I call the proponderance of incentive. Simply put, where there is corruption, there will be whistleblowers, and where there are whistleblowers there are always those who call them conspiracy theorists, but when someone objectively follows the incentives involved, on all sides, Ive found this to be the most prudent means by which to conduct research on controversial issues. Let’s muster the courage to question the Unquestionable Vaccine Assumptions, and ask, “Are they effective? Are they safe? Are they necessary?” The best, most rigorous science we have says “No,” or, at least, “We don’t know,” to all three questions. And clear, independent thinking about it generally concludes that vaccines are about profit, not health. Please do your research. Compile all the evidence you can find from all points of view. Factor in all incentives on all sides. THEN, make an informed decision as to what you believe. - LiveHEROic™ SOME INTERESTING LINKS TO START YOUR SEARCH: SEARCH YouTube for: congressional briefing and vaccine compensation board goo.gl/ThGm3q vran.org vaccinetruth.org sunherb/truth_about_vaccines.htm naturalnews/042012_vaccine_facts_vaccine... naturalnews/vaccines_get_the_full_story.html
Posted on: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 03:17:34 +0000