People, you cant win any argument if you acquiesce to other sides definition of the argument. The argument has to first be honestly defined. If you accept the big lie of the existence of the Palestinian people (a cynical fabrication designed specifically to oppose the Jewish presence in the erstwhile Palestine), then of course its only fair that a people should have a state of their own and the two state solution is the minimally fair goal to strive for (and in truth, the entire Palestine should belong to the palestinian people). If, however, the argument is honestly defined as Arabs vs. Jews, then the whole conflict is seen in a different (true) light. I will therefore henceforth not engage in any conversation that uses the term Palestinian People. All comments on my posts that make use of this term will be deleted. Lets be clear that Jews have no beef with the Arabs, their religion, their culture, and their language. Arabs already have 21 countries within the greater Arabia, they should complete the population exchange that they themselves started by kicking out the Jews from all of their countries and resettle the Arabs, currently residing between the Mediterranean sea and the Jordan river, within the various Arab countries. They should also subsidize these peoples resettlement costs. Then Arabs and Jews can trade peace for peace (no war, no incitement for enmity). The next step would be a slow trust-building process (diplomatic relations, trade). Then, after years of all this, when the Arab states allow Jews to live in their countries, with full and equal rights, Jews will be able to do the same in their country.
Posted on: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 18:13:46 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015