Random Thought (Update) Yesterday I said: • Did you know that the law an eye for an eye means that goodness must be repaid with equal goodness? Who would object to that? Wouldnt turning the other cheek suggest being greedy and ungrateful since we would be prone to receiving a double portion instead of reciprocating the good that was done to us? I wasnt surprised to see that everyone avoided dealing with the post but set up their own straw-man argument. The post is straight to the point. This is a reminder that people will always read whatever they want to read into what is posted and draw their own conclusions. Maybe I am asking people to do too much. Good day!
Posted on: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 12:25:58 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015