Read the following very carefully and govern yourselves accordingly. Public Notice Comment is hereby formally and in writing served upon you that scientific data is available to me and the people of the Republic United States of America on the substantive issues about the Environmental Assessment of the PACIFIC NORTHWEST ELECTRONIC WARFARE RANGE # 42759 Electronic Warfare Training Range Proposal. I challenge the Impact Statement (EIS) for this project with the Navy claiming there will be “NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT”. We, the People, DEMAND an immediate, thorough and honest investigation. The US Forest Service has no choice but to suspend or deny the request for a long term permit until further investigation is accepted by the Informed Consent of the People to use our National Forest roads for mobile emitters, which will be emitting powerful electromagnetic radiation. I object to this permit and am making a public recorded comment on record to voice my concerns. I would like it on public comment record that there is scientific data showing the impacts of electromagnetic radiation on Human Heath, Our Children, and our Environment. Such investigation will include independent, impartial experts, as well as ordinary citizens. Dr. Erica Mallery-Blythe - Electromagnetic Radiation, Health and Children 2014 youtu.be/sNFdZVeXw7M The Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Radiation on Human Health: Camilla Rees, MBA, founder of ElectromagneticHealth.org, delivers her keynote address at the Healthy Bodies Healthy Buildings Conference 2012, explaining in clear concise laymans terms, with compelling PowerPoint slides, the science and solutions for creating safe havens in a toxic, electromagnetic world and is Sponsored by the International Institute for Building-Biology & Ecology, a nonprofit environmental education organization. youtu.be/Z88glpsehQY “Why the current international safety standards do not predict biological hazard” Correspondence/Reprint request: Dr. Martin L. Pall, Professor Emeritus of Biochemistry and Basic Medical Sciences, Washington State University, 638 NE 41st Ave., Portland, OR 97232 USA. E-mail: [email protected] page1image14400 page1image14568 Professor Emeritus of Biochemistry and Basic Medical Sciences Washington State University, 638 NE 41st Ave., Portland, OR 97232 USA Martin L. Pall 1. Microwave electromagnetic fields act by activating voltage-gated calcium channels: why the current international safety standards do not predict biological hazard. Abstract. Microwave and other low frequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) have been shown to act by activating voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs) with most biological effects being due to elevated intracellular calcium, consequent nitric oxide (NO) elevation and either peroxynitrite or NO signaling. This, the role of excessive intracellular calcium in microwave effects and some 20,000 papers on microwave biological effects show that the current international safety standards do not predict biological hazard. Such standards are based on the false assumption that the predominant effects of microwave and other low frequency EMF exposures are due to heating. A whole series of biological changes reportedly produced by microwave exposures can now be explained in terms of this new paradigm of EMF action via VGCC activation, including: oxidative stress; single and double stranded breaks in cellular DNA; therapeutic effects; blood-brain barrier breakdown; greatly depressed melatonin levels and sleep disruption; cancer; male and female infertility; immune dysfunction; neurological dysfunction; cardiac dysfunction including tachycardia, arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death. A two-phase program for greatly improving EMF safety standards is proposed. World against what they consider to be unsafe exposures to microwave frequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs). Such exposures have increased by large amounts in recent years. Such demonstrations have been met with assertions by government organizations and by industry that these exposures are well within international and national safety standards and therefore can be assumed to be safe. They are correct that these are well within safety standards. A central question being examined here is whether these standards are based on well documented science such that if they are, we should be assured of safety. Current U.S. and International safety standards are based on the assumption that the only important thing that microwave and other low frequency EMFs can do biologically is to heat things (1-5), like heating things in a microwave oven. Based on that assumption, safety standards are based on heating (1-5) and the reasonable inference, if that assumption is correct, is that levels of exposures which only produce insignificant advocates for current standards argue that current safety standards are about 100 times more stringent than is needed (1), because even exposure levels 100 times higher than allowed by current safety standards produce only slight heating. However, over 20,000 publications in the scientific literature have reported substantial biological effects of at exposures well within safety standards, such that none of these should be possible if current safety standards are scientifically based. These include some 4000 studies on therapeutic effects of microwave EMFs, effects that are well known to be non-thermal (6). It should be noted that there is a reasonable basis for the heating assumption underlying current safety standards. The photons that make up microwave frequency and other low frequency fields are very low energy photons, without insufficient energy to individually change the chemistry of our bodies. That is they are different from ionizing radiation or even ultraviolet or visible radiation, where individual photons have sufficient energy to produce chemical changes. How, then can we understand the thousands of studies showing well-documented non-thermal biological effects of microwave frequency and other low frequency EMFs? cqlpe.ca/pdf/microw-vgccnoheat.pdf I reserve the right as being on public record to have standing in the recorded public comments section of the PACIFIC NORTHWEST ELECTRONIC WARFARE RANGE # 42759 to be able to comment and/or add scientific data LATER if/when there are appeals concerning the decision. Heres the Forest Service paragraph: Those wishing to provide input and have standing (eligibility) during the future Objection period for this project can be submitted to the project website, go.usa.gov/785z. Improper public notification was given to the communities where this testing is to be done. Public meetings were not being recorded on official public record. There are many unanswered questions such as: Why was there no public hearings held for the Navy’s drafting of their EA? Why was there no proper notification to the local newspapers, local TV, local radio, 911, law enforcement, or fire stations in all counties involved in the projected areas of the proposed sites where the Electromagnetic Warfare Training to be conducted. We are demanding that our Local, State, and Federal government disclose all information under the Freedom of Information Act about such activity on Electronic Warfare Training Range Proposal and the Biological Effects of EM Radiation. As citizens of the Republic United States of America, we expect our government officials to represent us, address our valid concerns, and take action to terminate such environmentally risky programs that are also having a severe impact, both short and long term, on the health of our population. I am not an attorney nor do I hold any legal back ground. I am a concerned citizen of the Republic United States of America and I refuse to give Consent based on not being fully informed with all scientific data being taken in consideration to make an Informed Consented decision to the best of my ability and knowledge. Respectfully submitted, Kimberly A. Whitaker, Sui Juris Kimberly Ann Whitaker (Kimberly Ann Waite maiden name given at birth) Natural Man (Women) in Private Venue. All Rights Reserved AT LAW Montana Citizen on behalf of myself and other concerned peoples of planet Earth.
Posted on: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 18:38:32 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015