SCIENCE VERSUS RELIGION Belief in Creation versus the Big-Bang Theory are not mutually exclusive hypotheses. Belief in the possibility of one does not negate belief that the other may also be possible. All it takes is an open mind, advanced enough to ask the right questions. According to the Big-Bang Theory an explosion, of energy began existence. Of course not even the most brilliant mind that ever existed, or will exist can answer how SOMETHING came from NOTHING to cause the explosion in the first place! Creationists believe God created everything in six days, then rested. Man was made last out of dust, and to dust he will return Big-Bang scientists believe stars exploded into Super-Novas which contained dust. All of the stardust spead all of the elements for LIFE throughout the cosmos. We are all carbon-based life-forms made from DUST, and when we die we return to DUST. Both SCIENCE and CREATIONISTS agree on this point. I believe that LIFE is a constant competition for METAPHYSICAL ENERGY. Everything in Nature tries to take as much energy as they can from every other energy source to increase our energy, then our body dies, but our ENERGY can not be destroyed. Consequently, that Energy continues throughout eternity. Man is both mortal and immortal at the same time. The physical body dies, but the Energy (Spirit) continues because even science agrees that energy can NOT BE DESTROYED. Before I waste too much time on my understanding of Quantum Physics, let me just reiterate no one can PROVE there is no God, and no one can PROVE God doesnt exist. Therefore, each belief is based solely on FAITH. If one believes in God, dies and is wrong they have lost NOTHING. If one does not believe in God, dies and is wrong they have lost EVERYTHING. CHOSE CAREFULLY. Oh how I love Thy Law! It is my meditation all the day.__Psalm 119-97
Posted on: Thu, 03 Jul 2014 12:22:54 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015