Starting with the Theory of Evolution, according to Charles Darwin - TopicsExpress



          

Starting with the Theory of Evolution, according to Charles Darwin in it’s simplest definition; it is claimed that humans evolved from apes and share the same genus with the primates of the Hominidae family. And that overtime, we gradually evolved to become humans or homo-sapiens Now first of all, when it comes to evolution, that would mean that if something evolved from something else, then it’s earlier stages should have already died off. Not to mention, DNA can change. And those changes are called mutations. Evolution doesn’twork as fast because if the DNA ofa human changed too drastically, they would not be able to reproduce with other humans. So with that being said, if we evolvedfrom Apes, then apes should no longer be in existence. Now I’m not all about attacking strawmen, but I have really tried to understand the Theory of Evolution, and to me it seems flawed. Atheists should try to understand the ORIGIN of evolution, rather than jumping the timeline. Another flaw that I wanted to point out is in reference to the BigBang Theory. Not the show, because the show is kickass. But the theory that is used as a counter argument for the existence of God. Scientists and atheists alike, believe that the universe came from a ‘god particle’ or the belief that nothing exploded into everything. First of all, I have yet to see a human or animal come out of a firecracker. Scientists and atheists believe thatfaith means nothing, and that faith doesn’t have anywhere closeto the amount of credibility evidence has. They also try to debunk religious believers with the nonsensical questions like, “where were you when God created the heavens and the earth? Where you there to witness it? Unless you took pictures or have cold hard proof of that happening, I don’t want tohear another word come out of your mouth.” Seems like Atheists and Scientists should also try to understand the ORIGIN of the Big Bang Theory as well. If you are so focused on going back to the beginning which you truly believe is the beginning, then try going beyond what you believe is the beginning. See how unlimited the possibilities are? But my questions to atheist and scientists are these, “Where wereYOU when the Big Bang happened? Were you around to witness it? AND DOESN’T IT TAKE A LEVEL OF FAITH TO *BELIEVE* THAT IT OCCURRED????” Scientistsuse faith in all their theories and their assumptions, because even though it has not been proven or disproved, they still believe it to betrue. When they’re about to prove or debunk something as a myth with a hypothesis and a test, they have FAITH that such outcomes will be in there favor. They are continuously contradicting their position. I don’t know about you, but that sounds hypocritical to me. Believe it or not, Atheism and Science have alot in common with generic religion. Some have gone so far as to say that they are actually religions I could go on for days about the many flaws because it is never ending, but I think it’s wrong and a waste of time to attack those who believe. And I will conclude this with one of my favorite quotes, “An atheist is a man who believes himself an accident.”
Posted on: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 07:36:50 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015