THE BUSH DOCTRINE (strike before you are stricken even when not truly threatened), the tale of three men thoroughly intent on the destruction of the Middle East and enriching their conscienceless patriarchs in the profits of oil within the guise of Christianity benevolence. It is hoped Americans will remember this in 2016, patriarchal derivatives of the Bush family tree, can mostly be trusted to expound monumental falsehoods for the consumption of the American citizenry; when in fact, it is only the satisfaction of their greedy personal desires which they seek to accomplish. So far, they have been sadly been successful; see the ‘Poppy’ Bush’s tax hikes on the middle classes, woefully disregarding his campaign promises. And who can forget the Iraqi War’s indecent fraud in the interest of killing hundreds of thousands of innocent people in the interest of their favored black gold, oil, thoroughly disregarding the pains and lives of infants, toddlers, and the consortium of human beings? One way of examining the continually growing Middle East crisis, is readily found within the prisms of George H. W. Bush and the relationships within two sons. Relationships fraught with childhood conflicts, ideological differences, and a profound failure to communicate. On many levels, the three men are trifold polar opposites with completely different belief systems. George H. W. Poppy Bush, an old-line Episcopalian, forged an alliance with Christian evangelicals during the 1988 presidential campaign because it was vital to winning the White House. However, his spiritual dogmas were never respected by hard-core evangelicals, and they always regarded him with a suspicion that he delightfully returned in faith-based kind. George H. W. Bush was a genial man with few bitter enemies, and while he did not win his most important campaign, the one which in many ways would historically seal the love of the American people, he remains a much loved, iconic, and sensible President. His son, George W. Bush, on the other hand, managed to appoint as secretary of defense no less than the last vestige of humankind to fit the bill for the job, Donald Rumsfeld. Once Rumsfeld and Vice President Dick Cheney took office (two species I might add, whose penchants for cruelty can be compared with the historical Attila the Hun), with Cheney as a supposed loyal friend, they brought in one neoconservative policy maker after another into the Pentagon, the vice president’s office staff, and the National Security Council. In some cases, these same men had battled the elder Bush when he was head of the CIA in 1976; as President, they fought him when, in the interest of saving hundreds of thousands of lives he decided not to remove Saddam Hussein from his perch during the 1991 Gulf War. In fact, their selfish goals as servants of George H. W. Bush can arguably be seen as attempts to dismantle the elder Bushs legacy, while further enriching themselves through defense industry investments. The younger Bush, George W., a genuine born-again Christian, was quite different than ‘Poppy.’ He gave hundreds of evangelicals’ key positions in the White House, the Justice Department, the Pentagon, and various federal agencies. One should ask how it was that after four generations of Bushs at Yale, the family name was now indicating that progress, science, and evolution were out, and stopping embryonic stem cell research was in. Why did George W. Bush turn back the hands of time his father gleefully endorsed to the days when Creationism held sway? I am of the firm opinion that there is a deep-seated hatred within the mind of George W. Bush for his popular father, and in fact reviewing history it seems his assaults on his father through associative thinking, like father, like son, was inclined to destroy the legacies of both! Hatred is perhaps, a far more powerful motivator than love. Evidence of this is readily observed within the spheres of conservative propagandas. Now, George W. Bush did not only reverse his fathers policies, he took things a step further: “The stakes are high,” the younger Bush told reporters on April 21, 2004, “and the Iraqi people are looking, they’re looking at America and saying, are we going to cut and run again?” this was, an outright, well-publicized insult aimed directly at the person of his father. One might say the statement is relevant of archaic and contravening religious dogmas. Or, “honor thy father in private? But perhaps not so much in public?” It makes little sense apart from the inherent rancor it implies exists from son to father. In any case, the religious convolutions were nothing compared to the Iraq War and the men who endorsed the devious plots to invade a foreign nation within the realms of wholesale fraud on the worlds most emotional theater, the taking of hundreds of thousands of innocent lives before their time, an act, I might add, for which they should not easily be forgiving, without facing a lawful jury of their duly chosen global peers. Not, I say in the interest of vengeance to fellow men, but for the sake of humanitys future, now is the acceptable time to exemplify a thoroughly constructive judicial world. Thus, it is essential, that acts against mankind resulting in hundreds of thousands of innocent deaths at the hands of indecently greedy men and psychopathic mentalities, serial killers if that is proven to be the case, should not under any circumstances go unpunished. Come what may, the United States is not above all the rights of the peoples of the world – chief among which is, and I quote, “the right to exist without threat to limb and body and in particularly so under wholesale fraudulent circumstances.” Today, Jeb Bush, a younger, perhaps more amicable clone of his older brother George, is again romancing the familial proclivity for the highest office in the land. Before the presidency of George W. Bush, the unspoken etiquette of the Oval Office was that sitting and former presidents did not attack one another; it remains a possibility that Jeb Bush, should he become president, uses precisely the same phrase which his elder brother used disdaining his fathers strict effort to save lives in the Gulf War, which George W. Bush described as “cutting and running.” With significant urgencies, Americans should first decide if Jeb Bush the apple has fallen dangerously close to his elder brothers orchard. If that be the case, the citizenry can rest assured that Jeb will also use the familiar phrase, “cutting, and running,” to describe the Bush family’s men in search of war-like self-glorification in the long held familial quest to seek the statuses of great conquerors. Perhaps one day they will succeed and be immortalized in the traditions of Genghis Khan, Attila the Hun, Alexander the Great, Napoleon Bonaparte, and the myriad of other similarly dubious characters; indeed, if human modernity now records such feats, the pluralistic and unearned assassinations of humankind, as acts of greatness and worthy of familial adorations. If that be the case, the peacefully inclined people can witness these tragedies as having come from the roots of conservative Christian fantasies, which are, I might add, dangerous ideas well inclined to host the next series of world wars in the sole interest of expanding rudimentary Christianity, and not, the fluids Americans presently swallow at fountains, fighting terrorism. In my humble opinion, the election of Jeb Bush to the highest office in the land tragically blows ill winds in the direction of the sovereign nation presently known as Iran, and America will surely guarantee itself a number of guerilla wars in the Middle East, wholly instigated by the powers of right winged domestic Christianity and the campaign dollars of Judaism. Please like me on Facebook! https://facebook/undergroundbestsellers Please support my political articles through the purchase of a novel @ undergroundbestsellers
Posted on: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 04:02:26 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015