THERE WAS NOTHING TRACEABLE, AS IT WERE, OF A DOUBT THAT THE GREAT KING SOLOMON, SON OF YET ANOTHER GREAT KING DAVID, ASKED FOR THE RIGHT THING, AND FOR THE RIGHT THING FOR THAT MATTER FROM GOD THE MOST HIGH!!!!!!!THERE WAS SOMETHING THAT WAS AMISS IN HIS REQUEST, AND WE WOULD NOT TALK ABOUT IT HERE AND NOW!!!!!!!HOWEVER, LET US CONSIDER THIS CONSTRUCT!!!!!!!LOTS AND COUNTLESS LOTS OF US DESIRE, STRONGLY SO DESIRE TO PROFESS AND PRACTISE THE SPEAKING OF THE LANGUAGE OF PHILOSOPHY AND PRESENTATION OF WISE SAYINGS YET WE DO NOT HAVE WHAT IT TAKES TO DO PROPER, DEEPER DEPTHS REASONING AND REENGINEERING, AS IT WERE, IN PHILOSOPHY!!!!!!!SOME OF US HAVE EVER NEVER STUDIED PHILOSOPHY AS A DISCIPLINE OF ITS KIND BUT THIS IS OUR POSITION AND POSITIONING ABOUT THE SUBJECT MATTER!!!!!!!FOR, YOU ARE AT ALL TIMES LIABLE TO RIDICULE AND REBUKE OF PHILOSOPHY ITSELF, AND HERE WE MEAN THE WORDS YOU MAY WELL USE MUST AND MUST BE SEEN AND REGARDED AS THE SAME WORDS BY WHICH PHILOSOPHY AS A "BEING" IN THAT BOTH OBJECTIVE AND SUBJECTIVE CONTEXTS WOULD PILE YOU UP THE SUPREME COURTING COURTS OF LITERARY JUSTICE!!!!!!!WE DARE MUST AND MUST REMEMBER THAT EVERY SINGLE WORD USED AND ESPOUSED MUST AND MUST NECESSARILY BE MIRRORED AS ONE BY WHICH YOU MAY WELL BE ABLE TO STAND AND STAND FIRMLY SO SPEAKING AND EMPHASISISNG SUPREME, OTHERWISE, YOU ARE JUST LIKELY TIO FALL PRONE TO THE JST DISCOURSES OF ITS UNDERPINNING CORNERSTONES!!!!!!!WITHIN THE CONFINES OF THE INSIGHT HERE GIVEN, SAYING: "A REAL MAN KNOWS THAT HE WAS CREATED TO LOVE, BUT HE IS MATURE ENOUGH TO KNOW THAT SHARING HIS LIFE AND MOMENTS OF INTIMACY WITH RANDOM WOMEN IS FOLLY.STRONG MEN ARE FAITHFUL"!!!!!!!YOU HAVE SAID IT ALRIGHT, AND WE EVEN HAVE PEOPLE WHO DO NOT TAKE TIME TO THINK THROUGH SUCH A CONSTRUCT OF AN INSIGHT CONCURRING TO SUCH A CONSTRUCT, HOWEVER RIDICULOUS AND AND AMBIGUOUS IT MAY WELL SOUND AND MIRROR!!!!!!!IF YOU SAY AND/OR CLAIM, THAT A REAL MAN KNOWS THAT HE WAS CREATED TO LOVE, THE QUESTION THAT QUICKLY DRUMS HOME A POINT WORTH EXAMINING IS THIS: WHAT IS MEANT BT THE PHRASE: "A REAL MAN"?, THAT IS QUESTION ONE (1)!!!!!!!NEXT: HOW IS THE SAID REAL MAN AS HERE ESPOUSED IN YOUR CONCEPTION EXPECTED TO LOVE, AND ASIDE FROM THAT, LOVE WHOM?COULD YOU BE DEFINITE AND EVEN SPECIFIC AS REGARDS WHO IN THIS CONTEXT OF CONSTRUCT IS BEING REFERRED TO?AGAIN, IF YOU DO CLAIM, AS IT WERE, REFLECTIVE OF AN ALLEGATION, ACCUSATION AND/OR INNUENDO OF ITS KIND, THAT THE SAID REAL MAN MUST AND MUST KNOW HE IS MATURE ENOUGH TO KNOW THAT SHARING HIS LIFE AND MOMENTS OF INTIMACY WITH RANDOM WOMEN IS FOLLY, THE QUESTION THAT COMES THROUGH HEAD-ON WITH EVERYONE IS: IN WHAT PARTICULAR CONTEXT(S) ARE YOU SAYING THAT THE SAID REAL MAN IS MAING A FOOL OF HIMSELF BY MAKING TIME OF INTIMACY WITH RANDOM WOMEN?!!!!!!!FIRST OF ALL, WHICH PARTICULAR DEFINITIONS CENTRE AND/OR MIRROR YOUR DEFINITION AND FRAMING OF THE WORDS "RANDOM WOMEN?"AGAIN, HOW TRUE ARE YOUR CONCEPTIONS AS REGARDS THE ASSERTION THAT THE SAID "REAL MAN" TO WHOM YOU ARE REFERRING HAD ACTUALLY BEEN SPENDING HIS LIFE AND MOMENTS OF INTIMACY WITH THE SO-CALLED RANDOM WOMEN, AN ACT WHICH IN YOUR OPINION AND, OF COURSE, SUGGESTION IS FOLLY!!!!!!!"STRONG MEN ARE FAITHFUL" YOU SAID!!!!!!!THE QUESTION IS THIS:WHO IS A STRONG MAN, AND IN THIS PARTIVULAR CONTEXT WHO IS A STRON MAN WHO MUST AND MUST BE SEEN AS BEING FAITHFUL!!!!!!!UNDER WHAT CIRCUMSTANCES COUD YOU BE JUSTIFIED IN ALLEGING THAT THE PERSON HAD BEEN UNFAITHFUL, AND IF SO IN WHAT CONTEXT? WHAT DOES IT MEAN AND IMPLY TO BE FAITHFUL? WHAT BARE THE CONDITIONS THAT MUST AND MUST NECESSARILY EXIST TO HELP MAKE THE IDEA OF BEING FAITHFUL WORK OUT FOR EVERYONE?HOW DOES THE REAL MAN IN YOUR VIEW FALL FOUL OF THE RULES AND LAWS OF SENSIBILITIES, INTEGRITY AND, OF COURSE, JUSTIFICATIONS OF TRUE RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATIONSHIP BUILDING WHERE THERE ARE NO SUCH GROUNDS UPON WHICH TO PITCH ANY SUCH ROOMS FOR ACCUSATION, ALLEGATIONS AND OTHER, VARIOUSLY INCOMPREHENSIBLE APPROACHES TO WHICH SUCH ALLEGATIONS, ACCUSATIONS AND INNUENDOS COME INTO THE PICTURE?!!!!!!!EXACTLY WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY SAYING SPENDING WITH RANDOM WOMEN? ARE YOU BEING RIGHT AND, AS IT WERE, SINCERE, TRUE AND ORDERLY WITH YOPUR CONSCIENCE(S) OR PERHAPS JUST BASING YOUR POINTS OF VIEW WITH HERESAYS, GOSSIPS, PREJUDICES, MISCONCEPTIONS, ETC, ETC, ALL OF WHICH ARE IN NO DOUBT CONNECTED TO THE PRINCIPAL PRINCIPALITIES OF HYPOCRISY?ARE WE ALRIGHT WITH OUR SENSES AND CONSCIENCES?JUST THINK AND THINK THROUH THESE THINGS!!!!!!!IF THE IDEA OF BEING FAITHFUL, AS IT WERE, IN A RELATION IS PUT IN CONTEXT, DOES IT TAKE THE TWO PARTIES TO THE RELATIONSHIP TO MAKE IT WORK OR IN YOUR CONCEPTION OF LOVE, IT IS ONLY THE SO-CALLED "REAL MAN" THAT MATTERS?WE BETTER CHECK OURSELVES OUT IN THESE MATTERS BEFORE WE FALL FOUL OF COMMON SENSE AND ITS VARIOUS, VARYING ILLUMINATIONS!!!!!!! !!!!!!!(SEALED, COPYRIGHTED, SEALED AND SEALED BY SEAL OF THE MIGHTY HANDED, HANDYHAND THE MOST HIGH, ON HIGH, EVER FOREVER, FOREVER EVER, SOVEREIGN LORD GOD OF ISRAEL, THE LORD GOD OF HOSTS, AS IT WERE, ON THIS SPECIAL DAY OF DAYS THE 7TH DAY OF JUNE 2013 AT 15:47 PM UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN TIME, UNDER THE PRESCRIPTIVE PROVISIONS OF INTERNATIONAL COPYRIGHTS LAWS, STATUTES AND INSTRUMENTS AS ACCORDINGLY SO DONE BY LAW EXACT IN CONTENT, AS IT WERE, OF WORDED WORDS OF THE WORDS, EXACTED BY SO DOING IN PRINCIPLE , AS IT WERE, MIRRORED IN THE UNDERSCORING LAWS OF LAW OF THE LAW AND, BY SAME AS IN THE ALL-ENCOMPASSING CONSTRUCTS, BRIDGES, ABRIDGED BRIDGES AND SYNCHRONICITY-INFORMED DICTATES OF LAW AS BY LAW OF THE LAWS ESPOUSED AND, ACCORDINGLY STILL BY LAW OF THE LAWS OF ALL LAWS AND LAWS ESPOUSED AND ESTABLISHED)!!!!!
Posted on: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 15:05:27 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015