The Last Affairs of Prudent Beaudry By Cecile Page Vargo Following an active professional and civic life, Los Angeles pioneer, Prudent Beaudry, retreated to quiet and excellent health. Suddenly one day in the middle of May 1893, Beaudry suffered from a paralytic attack. Although every modern means of medical science was availed to him, Prudent Beaudry rapidly grew worse. At 9 pm May 29th, Prudent Beaudry, the former mayor of Los Angeles, passed away in his home at 607 Temple Street. Prudent Beaudry left behind a substantial estate under the terms of a his last will and testament dated June 20, 1891. In addition to land and houses throughout the city of Los Angeles, notes, contracts for sale of real estate, 1,062 Temple Street Railway Company shares, jewelry, household goods and personal belongings with a combined worth of $356,604.39 were appraised by A Gibson, G.S. Safford and I. N. Moore. Real estate properties were located primarily in the western part of Los Angeles near the vicinity of the sisters’ Hospital, and along the Temple street cable line. All property was left in trust to his manager and executor F.W. Wood, H. Nadeau, J. M. Elliott of Los Angeles, and Prudent’s brother Joseph Beaudry who resided in Montreal. In accordance to the will, Prudent Beaudry’s body was embalmed and conveyed to Montreal where he was buried beside his brother Victor in the Catholic Cemetery “cote des Neiges.” ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Meantime, let’s travel back in time a bit further to September 13, 1851. We are at No. 13th Rathborn Place London, W. C. where the cries of a new born baby can be heard. Mary Froom Beaudry has just given birth to a son. Edward Aldophus was christened Catholic like his mother. Three months later, as Mary succumbs to complications from childbirth, the infant was left in the care of Mrs. Bunyon, his nursemaid. The nursemaid, a dissenter, re-christened the child in the Protestant faith. As the child reached school age, Mrs. Bunyon registered him in the French School on Denmark Street, also in London, W. C. where he received his early education. Up until he was 7 or 8 years old, Edward was well taken care of financially in a mysterious manner, with little concerns. By the time he was 9 years old Mrs. Bunyon passed away, leaving Edward an orphan without knowledge of his paternity. Around 12 years old, Edward Aldophus Beaudry, went out to find his own way in life. Sir Lord Smart of Bedrford Square, London, W. C. hired him as a page. He worked faithfully under liberal compensation until Lord Smart’s death. At the age of 16, Edward found himself a board a steamship to Canada, upon orders of English authorities, for reason’s unrevealed to him. He traveled from a dock in Scotland across the ocean to Quebec, where he was then bundled on a railcar to Montreal, apparently under the direction of an unknown benefactor. Edward found employment in various positions while he was in Canada. His resume would include that of steward at the St. Lawrence Hotel. He was always thought highly of by employers and he was often noted as “a man of frugal instincts, energetic, and trustworthy.” Somewhere along in time, Edward Beaudry eventually earned a reputation as a fresco artist, decorating the homes of elegant mansions in Gotham, New York. When he wound up in San Francisco, California on a search for the identity of his father, he took up the brush as well. In San Francisco, he discovered that he had an uncanny resemblance to Prudent Beaudry, the successful merchant who went on to become the mayor of Los Angeles. On a quiet afternoon in the middle of October 1894, Edward Aldophus Beaudry found himself in Los Angeles on Temple Street. Now in his 40’s, Edward appeared a neatly dressed man, wearing a tall silk hat, with a neat chinless beard, brown eyes, and a rather full face. He was short in stature, no more than five feet four or five inches tall. As he strolled up the street he came across a local couple also out and about, and asked if they knew which house was the residence of Prudent Beaudry. As it turned out they were just across the street from the home. The lady was well acquainted with the former Mayor. She pointed it out to Edward, stating that Mr. Beaudry had been dead for some time. Edward nodded, as he was aware that the man that he now knew to be his father, was indeed dead, and he was here to look after his estate. Edward knocked upon the door of the old Beaudry residence on Temple Street, where the housekeeper was now leasing the place and running it as a lodging house. She was told that he was looking for a room for he and his wife,. After a few moments of interchange, Edward inquired if this was indeed the home of the late Prudent Beaudry. Upon confirmation that it was his alleged father’s home, Edward informed the housekeeper that he was the former Los Angeles mayor’s son. According to the housekeeper, Edward proceeded to tell her that the well known Los Angeles bachelor had gone to London in 1855 and married his mother. At this point he did not reveal his mother’s name, but he did declare that she had died not long after he was born. Upon her death, Edward’s father, Prudent Beaudry left him in the capable hands of another woman. This woman died when he was 9 years old. From that point in his childhood, Edward claimed to have lost all contact with his father. The housekeeper continued to listen as Edward explained that most of his life had been spent in and around London, but for an unspecified number of years he had been in America. While living in San Francisco he followed a string of clues that lead him to understand that his father was Prudent Beaudry. Edward also told her that two years ago he had sent a letter to his father at this Temple Street address, but received no reply. More recently, however, a relative of his father approached him and noticed the striking resemblance that Edward had to Prudent. This prompted Edward to gather all of the information he had obtained proving his theory, and head to Los Angeles. At this point in time, he had been in the city for a couple of days. Edward told the housekeeper of his intentions to prove the legality of the marriage between his mother and his father, and that he knew of a living witness to the ceremony. He also had engaged attorneys in Los Angeles and San Francisco that could help establish his claims. On October 22, 1894 the story Edward told to the housekeeper hit the streets of the thriving Southern California metropolis. Headlines in the Los Angeles Times shouted in bold print: SAYS HE IS SON Another Heir to the Beaudry Estate ----------------------------------------------------------- A Man in the city Who Claims That Prudent Beaudry Was His Father ----------------------------------------------------------- He Says He Was Born In England And That he Can Prove The The Legality Of His Claim. Fred Wood, Prudent Beaudry’s long time confidential advisor and business manager was left in charge of the estate. When approached by a Los Angeles Times reporter about the housekeeper’s unusual visitor and his tale, he replied that he had not been contacted by the man who claimed to be his long time employer’s son. To the best of Fred Wood’s knowledge the late Mr. Beaudry had never been married, and considering the relations between the two of them he most certainly would have been told about any marital relationship and possible heirs. The months pass by and nothing else is heard in the newspapers about the new heir to Prudent Beaudry’s estate. Then on April 5, 1896 the headlines of the Los Angeles Times shout out even louder than they had before: Claims To Be Son! ----------------------------- A Contestant Appears For Prudent Beaudry’s Estate ----------------------------- Incidents in the Lives of theClaimant And the Dead Capitalist Which Seem to Support This Late Contention The time had approached for the final distribution of Prudent Beaudry’s estate, and Edward Beaudry was back in town with a birth certificate proving that he was born on No. 13 Rathborn Place. The date of his birth was September 13, 1851, and he was telling the romantic story of his mother, Mary Froom and Prudent, including her death three months after he was born. Yet it’s interesting to note, that the story that appeared two years before in the same newspaper as told by Edward Beaudry himself to the housekeeper, has the date of his of Prudent Beaudry coming to London in 1855. The details of Edward’s own life and travels had also changed a bit. The Los Angeles Times made no reference to those changes, but the differences jump off the page as this modern historian compares the two articles. The April 5, 1896 Los Angeles Times discusses the details of formally presenting the claims of a new heir in the Beaudry estate, and that they must be made on or before the probate proceedings would come to conclusion on May 20th. It was also noted that since the claimant, Edward Adolphus Beaudry, was not a citizen of the United States, he would have two years in to present his chain of evidence to the courts and that the matter could remain in the courts for twice twelve months, should it be needed. At this point in time, documents in Edward’s possession proved his mother’s death not long after his own, as well as other stories about Mrs. Bunyon, the nursemaid that took charge of him, and his early education at the French School on Denmark Street in London. The family of Edward’s first employer, Lord Smart, also sent acknowledgements that the man of 45 claiming to be the Prudent Beaudry heir was one and the same as the faithful page to the head of the Smart house, and that the life of this man could be traced back to his nurses arms from the day his mother died when he was three months of age. More evidence of Edward’s birthright was said to be waiting in London, which would mean a trip would be in order back to his home town. As there was no money available for the journey, the newspaper states that these funds were soon to be secured, with the help of the ex-attorney general of California, W. H. H. Hart. Even if Hart didn’t follow through as expected, Edward Beaudry apparently had others who would back his cause. At this time, it was also announced that there were witnesses regarding Edward Beaudry’s parentage. In addition there were witnesses who would swear that Prudent Beaudry, who was well known in California to never have been married, actually made statements that he had a son years ago. These witnesses would attest to the fact that when asked why he hadn’t married, Prudent Beaudry would reply, “I can never bring myself to the assumption of the relations with a woman which might cause her to suffer as did that woman who bore to me a son.” Reputable lawyers, and others enjoying the confidence of Prudent Beaudry over the years, also claimed they had been told the story of child whom he had supported for six or seven years in his life. A look at the portraits of Prudent and Edward, according to the Los Angeles Times, show “them to be certainly like enough to be father and son….” Complexions are said to be the same, features and figure almost identical. Even those who knew Prudent Beaudry “are not averse to admitting that the younger man has something more than parchment on which to base his parentage.” Reportedly, Edward was thought of sincere in thinking he was the child of the dead capitalist, and made no overtures for money to those administering to the Prudent Beaudry Estate. He was however,asking for help in gaining employment until he could prove his birthright and take proper measures for securing his inheritance. As of the date of the April 1896 newspaper article, it did not appear any attempt had been made by Beaudry executors to help Edward in his search for a job. Inspite of discouragements, Edward Beaudry held on tenaciously, and was prepared to prove his case. F. W. Wood, as executor of the Prudent Beaudry estate, and life long confidant, looked with suspcion on the claims of Edward Beaudry, and continued to carry out the very full instructions of his friend and associate.. Wood contended that Mr. Beaudry would have talked of his romance with Mary Froom at some time over the course of the years, and expressed surprise that a contest of the will was possibly in the making. Formal notification of Edward Adolphus Beaudry’s right to the estate of Prudent Beaudry as his son, were expected to be filed in Superior Court within in a matter of days. The Los Angeles Times would announc further details of the case as they became available. Apparently, it was never taken to court, as no other newspaper articles on the subject have been found, at least by this Explore Historic California reporter. A small notice did appear on May 17, 1899: The Beaudry Estate ------------- Confirmation of Sale By the Admin- strators by Judge Campbell. Prudent Beaudry died in May 1893, and now the Estate is rapidly closed out by the administrators, F.W. Wood, H. Nadeau and J. M. Elliott. Yesterday Judge Campbell confirmed the sale of a number of Pieces of property, but bids were reopened in the Courtroom on three lots. Mrs. Hannah Ellen Haynes has bid $3000 for the “Kimball Mansion,” situated on the bluff on Buena Vista Street, and one of the landmarks of the city, but when bids were re-opened the Price was run up to $4000 at which figure Mrs. Haynes became the purchaser. Another piece of Property on Bueana Vista Street brought $2603, And 66.21 acres bounded by Alhambra Avenue, The lands of Mari Ybarra de Ruiz, and the Mission Road brought $20,000. In all, the sale aggregated About $50,000.
Posted on: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 16:12:33 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015