The theory of Evolution Statement #1: All life comes from purely natural means. Statement #2: Thus the theory of evolution ‘assumes‘, “that all life on Earth (fossil record included) came from natural, evolutionary means.” Statement #3: Human evolution is the evolutionary process leading up to the appearance of modern humans When we employ the scientific method of observation, we can plainly see that genetic modification, designing the genetic pool by artificial means will give us life that did not come from purely natural means, thus falsifying statement #1. Since statement #1 is no longer “true” then the ‘assumption’ in statement #2 is no longer backed by substantiation. For if life “can be designed” through scientific means, then the assumption in statement #2 must show empirical evidence to such and such evidence does not exist beyond that of unsubstantiated “assumption”. To state that humanity is an ‘end result’ of an evolutionary process is not founded in science and is yet another unsubstantiated assumption backed by unfounded assumption. Thus statement #3 has not been shown by the scientific methods to be true by anything other than assumption and lacks the backing of statement #1 in the assumptive foundation of reasoning. The possibility exists, that life could have been designed at some point in the fossil record for scientific design through genetics is shown to be a viable possibility, so to ignore design for the unsubstantiated assumption of statement #3 only serves to make the theory of evolution blind alley science by the exclusion of genetic manipulation (scientific design). The “Theory of Evolution” and “Christian Creationism” both rely on ‘faith’ backing their perspective points of view for lack of any real evidence in favor of unsubstantiated ‘assumption’…
Posted on: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 15:41:53 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015