Title Direct, All Noble GMs. Thank you, but you must do it openly and directly. We wont be done with my business with you until it is direct. DODs Cash Bonas Game, DOD Dips did it all: 1994 - Now: All in, yes they are: Re: Bernstein, Hausfeld, Robbins-Lerach, Scarpulla, Walner, Blair Nicholas et al. Social Contract Price Experts, This is a verified reminder about part of the reason that in 2000 I separated, but have yet to divorce, you and my other field colleagues – some of whom are indicated above. I am exercising patience with regard to your concerted refusal to deal and sign off of on our divorce like windup papers. Until that happens, we shall have no finality and repose over the true ownership of all cases, cash and other business property dating from 1994 to the present by operation of Constructive Trust. First, for the record, our in and out house case partnership dispute centers on this, among other, agreement the plaintiff class bar regularly enters with Wall Street’s firms: Nobody will argue on our [plaintiff class] side or our economist or anyone else, that the fact that they … checked [prices] … meets the standard for an agreement or conspiracy. That agreement is loaded. It is an agreement to conceal direct evidence of economic price crimes by diverting attention to circumstantial theory in lieu of simple facts. The net result of this criminal agreement (a price fixing agreement entered by law firms in price lit) is an abyss of circular economic non-sense, the traces of which are illustrated by courts who have been misled by the Class bar: “In the absence of direct evidence, the plaintiffs may … support their [price] claim with circumstantial evidence of conscious parallelism (called parallel or match pricing). Conscious parallelism, … [or] price coordination, is described as the process not in itself unlawful, by which firms in a concentrated market might in effect share monopoly power, setting their prices at a prefixed maximizing, supra competitive level …. The proof that the above agreement is entered in all cases lies in the complaints themselves – the shift from direct proof of bad faith pricing (by failure of good faith compliance) to circumstantially attempting to address only the symptoms and not the causes of bad faith price systems. Those symptoms include, e.g., a circular discussion of: 1) barriers to entry; 2) inelastic demand; 3) lack of substitutes; 4) similar costs; 5) concentration levels; 6) absence of fringe sellers; and 7) joint price increases, among other countless symptoms. This economic matrix permits desired business opportunity to confuse courts and pad bills in lieu of litigating economic contract consideration basics as presented in Exhibits A, B and C. As you know, I suggested briefing chain price systems and fronting those facts with controlling authorities. I did just that in my 02-10-01 and many other ’01 memos, some of which I circulated to the players during my six week “pro-test” and withdrawal show. What those that entered the above pact did confirms that my suggestion was not well received. Howarth’s back-to-back Noonan-Stone actions against me are both direct proof of malfeasance, like the Bar’s published propaganda about me. Second, the above agreement is entered as a shell for the concerted anointment of bad faith or criminal pricing, as you know or should know. The bottom line is that companies and lawyers alike exchange price information by price checking to secure super-competitive profits – revenues in the amounts that could not be achieved pursuant to lawful or faithful cost based price measures. The dilemma men like Len Simon, Douglas Richards, Lerach, Kendrick, Hausfeld and Scarpulla (old time field players) have in this regard is simple: they have hustled countless courts to secure big fee awards for decades. They have done so through a series of material legal, economic and factual omissions. Both sides do this. The motive: lots of money on the table in complex lit. Third, through un-ethical concealment of economic, legal and factual details, the class field has designed a cozy business of filing and dragging out sure thing cases by engineering a matrix of confused facts and law for billing purposes. The top players stack cases with lower level lawyers unfamiliar with Wall Street systems and controlling authorities for billing purposes. Fourth, you and you alone have been in exclusive possession of my firm books, cases, money and other property since on or about 01-17-00. In ‘00 the only key “windup” communications you ever had with me about My Firm centered exclusively on your “needing” my signature to “cash,” deposit & withdraw” any funds in the Nasdaq case. You agreed with men like Francis to have my name removed from all other partnership checks, or you forged my name. Some direct proof of hard core fiduciary breaches are contained in the following firm letters, among others: Ex 04-24-00 We have written on several occasions. [W]e have received zero. Ex 07-24-00 Our records indicate … General claim of $11,205.00 (loadstar) Ex 07-20-00 Mom …, verbatim, “Cash was completely authorized – for all …” Ex 07-20-00 ”To supply … back-up information … time & expense ….” Ex 09-08-00 Kendrick Re: “Need my sig to withdraw My Firm cash & C-YA.” Ex 06-26-00 Sample – Owed Protecting X’s/Partner’s Interest – 3 sig … All. Ex 01-23-08 Skirnick said, “Dance of the Class Lit Pigs” - colorful metaphor.” But never mind that for now. I think it’s prudent to put our differences behind and work together in representing others – for finality and repose. Fifth, perhaps in winding up the old you will consider beginning a new. I’d like to invite you all to pursue a list of cases that I have been working on for some time now, ranging from fields including: The Fed Reserve, The State Bar, Insurance, retail gas chains, automakers, labor actions under MR=MC rules, city acts, Sheriffs’ syndicating standing-less ticket lawsuits by raw military force, auto-makers and more. I look forward to hearing from and working with you in doing the job that politics sadly do not permit our paid guardians at the SEC, DOJ and SEC to do. Kind regards, Gary Joseph Bonas II On you, DOD Cannibals: https://youtube/watch?v=YqCTGoWMZcQ
Posted on: Fri, 02 Jan 2015 02:32:14 +0000