Velmoshanovnyy Court notice I Kiparenko Alexander all joined together. I gave you two products in which Ukraine State Courts decision is not in fact the first pytannya.Po material: District Courts of Appeal and the appeal made by the illegal actions of officials of the air "associated with the imposition of a disciplinary sanction, rishennya.Skarha was not lawful that directly disciplinary action was imposed arbitrarily and courts without considering the merits indicated that these officials have the right to impose any kind of disciplinary DST styahnen.Bilshe of 16 November 2006 the Supreme Administrative Court of Ukraine was considered My cassation appeal against the decision of the Pechersky Court 15serpnya 2003roku decision and the Court of Appeal of Kyiv on October 16 2003roku.V this appeal I asked: 1.Skasuvaty ruling from the Court of Appeal of Kyiv 16.10.2003r. 2.Skasuvaty decision of Pechersk District Court of 15.08.2003r. 3.Ponovyty term appeal 4.Kasatsiynu complaint from 31lypnya2003r.pryynyaty into consideration. His decision of the Administrative Court of Ukraine 16.11.2006r.Vyschiy my appeal upheld the decision chastkovo.Skasuvav Court of Appeal of Kyiv from 16.10.2003r., Quashed the decision of Pechersk District Court m.Kyeva vid15.08.2003r.Takym way, not taking action on Two recent issues of the appeal and directed the case for a new trial or for further consideration, the Court automatically renewed term appeal (decision revoking who refused to renew the term appeal.) An appeal was registered in the Supreme Administrative Court of Ukraine ought, had to be transferred judge rapporteur, who in the absence of interference decides on the opening appeal. The next meeting of the Supreme Administrative Court of Ukraine held 24sichnya 2008r.bulo reviewed my application to renew the term of filing the appeal (or appeal?), But which, any application to renew the term of appeal to the Supreme Administrative Court of Ukraine I podavav.Bula my application 31.07.2003r.do of Kiev Pechersk Court to renew the term of an appeal on the decision of the Court of Appeal of Kyiv 16.05.2003r.Po this statement 15serpnya 2003r.Pecherskyy Kyiv Court issued a ruling which rejected the renewal of the term of appeal, appeal and upheld the Court of Appeal of Kyiv rozhlyadu.Uhvaloyu of 16 zhovtnya2003r.vyschezhadana decision of the Court of Kiev Pechersk zmin.Vse left without it we looked at the meeting of the Supreme Administrative Court of Ukraine 16.11.2006roku. On the second material: Alexander Kiparenko I gave you a solution Donetsk Court of Appeal (which is considered material instead of the Supreme Court of Ukraine due to the shortage of judges "Court staff" in the Supreme Court). I sent you an email from 05.11.2007roku.Vidpovidno the Law of Ukraine "On Amendments to the Law of Ukraine "" On the Judicial System of Ukraine "to ensure that the cassation civil proceedings against 22lyutoho 2007 year № 697-V transfer for consideration and decision in accordance with Chapter V 2rozdilu Civil Procedural Code of Ukraine civil case filed by OM Kiparenko The decision of which (Donetsk Court) ruled is the Supreme Court of Ukraine, to wit reversed the decision of the Court vid28lystopada 2005roku Shevchenko, Kyiv Court of Appeals ruling on 08chervnya2006roku and sent the first instantsiyu.A first instance court 16hrudnya2008roku vice versa Shevchenko and Appeals Court of Kyiv 16hrudnya2009roku again brought no legitimate solution: I-30.04.2013roku Alexander Kiparenko gave you Velmoshanovnyy European Court "Disc recording a new decision Shevchenko Kyiv Court of 16hrudnya 2008roku" this confirms receipt "Ukrpochta" Ukraine and recommended a special form of the fact that you have received my "Drive" with your new decision Shevchenko Kyiv Court of 16hrudnya 2008. Now that I Kiparenko Alexander did not provide anything new (new information)? And, that I turned in all court in the State of Ukraine: Ukraine, District Courts, Courts of Appeal Ukraine, Administraytyvnyy Supreme Court of Ukraine, the Supreme Court of Ukraine, addressed MPs Ukraine (Vladimir paneling, Leonid Yemets, Yuriy Miroshnichenko, Natalie King, Viktor Yanukovych, Paul Lebyedev), appeal to the Government of Ukraine, the High Council of Justice of Ukraine, the High Qualifications Commission of Judges of Ukraine, the appeal to the President of Ukraine Viktor Yanukovych, Verkhovna Rada on the rule of law and justice from PAST GIVES YOU vidpovid.Yakyy again and again all sent to the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine. Ministry of Ukraine has today Kozyr which also refers. Kiparenko you Alexander dismissed by applicable law, as confirmed by the decision of the Court of Kyiv Shevchenko from 28.05.2008r., which is upheld by the decision of the Court of Appeal of Kyiv 08.06.2006r.Tsi decision reversed by the Supreme Court of Ukraine (Donetsk Appeal Court) February 15 2008r.ta ruling by HAC 26.07.2011r.Tsya judgment is biased because Order number 550 of 29.09.2004r.p.3.4.holosyt: "According to paragraph 3.4 above order of appointment of employees to other positions and their dismissal from the order made Deputy Chief - Chief of staff to work with." This means Velmoshanovnyy European Court that Vladimir Berezan - Deputy Head of Research Affairs of Ukraine in Kiev had no right to sign or dismiss me Alexander Kiparenko of Internal Affairs of Ukraine:. Vladimir Berezan had the right to release me from Alexander Kiparenko post. I Kiparenko Alexander worked in the Internal Affairs of Ukraine 32 (thirty two) roky.Vyhnaly me of MIA of Ukraine as a "dog" on the street without PENSIYI.TRUDOVA books and military ID to the present day are the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine (ten years). Alexander I Kiparenko to date chyslyus as the Kyiv City Organization of sports society "Dynamo" Ukraine. A decree of dismissal from office was not izdanyy.Yoho SUSCHESTVUYE? witness in the case Zelenska Lyubov 08lypnya1955r.n.v two stages Court Records showed that Alexander I Kiparenko in furthering May-December 2004r.hodyv to work in Kyiv City Organization of sports society "Dynamo" Ukraine on the street Instytutska, 29. Such is the mess in the State of Ukraine. After reducing the number of employees, March 3 2004goda order CLC DSF "Dynamo" Ukraine under Labor Code fired to reduce the number shtatu.Mene as Alexander Kiparenko no one asked? Toby is on the translation of the report, the appointment to Darnitskii administration of MIA of Ukraine in m Kiev Alexander Kiparenko I did not write? when reduction was by order number 560 of 17lypnya2001r. signed by the Minister of Interior Yu.O.Smyrnov localities 3., and conditions of service of officers approved by the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine vid29lypnya 1991., namely Section IV appointment, transfer and promotion localities "G" (by the way I position provided you òîæå) Move the service of middle, senior and top management staff should be made, usually without crediting them available to appropriate law enforcement agencies, the appointment of persons who are in the disposal of the body, is made as soon as possible, but not within two months from the date of their dismissal from office!!!, and Alexander Kiparenko I repeat for the umpteenth time that is not relieved of the post of Kyiv City Organization of sports society "Dynamo" in Ukraine today the 22lypnya 2013roku.Ya Alexander Kiparenko not right from the beginning was appointed to Darnitskii administration of MIA of Ukraine in Kiev. Salaries Alexander I Kiparenko with the appointment of me to Darnitskii RUHU MIA Ukrayinyv Kiev from May 3, 2004 and did not get to today 22lypnya2013roku not got no time!! Moreover read carefully the order number 677 of 27.12.2004r.p.4.Finansoviy of Darnitskii RU does not charge and does not pay salaries Kiparenku AM from 03 travnya2004r.do day of its release. Because my purpose was not according to the law: When administered police officer is transferred to a new duty station (cash attestat, Veschevoy attestat), I paid child support dock on savings knyzhku.To by law had to transfer execution to Darnitskii administration of MIA of Ukraine in m.Kyyevi.A maintenance Darnytske reactor as never once to today the not numbered and not paid 22lypnya2013rik. You do not freeing me from one office Kiparenko Alexander was appointed to another position? According to the Law of Ukraine "On Employment" section 4 "and guarantees the loss of work" (title of section 4 of the Law of Ukraine 17.11.1992r. № 2787-XII), Article 26 Specific guarantees for employees who lost their jobs in connection with changes in the organization of production and labor. 1.Pratsivnykam employment contract which was terminated at the initiative of the owner or the authorized body in connection with changes in the organization of production and labor, including liquidation, reorganization, restructuring of enterprises, institutions, organizations, downsizing or state prtsivnykiv and soldiers (MIA ) discharged from military service in connection with downsizing or staff without the right to a pension, provided they are registered with the employment service within seven calendar days after the release, such as job seekers are guaranteed: D) The right to early retirement and a half years before the term people approaching retirement age. And I Kiparenko Alexander had seniority at the time of downsizing prtsivnykiv. Velmoshanovnyy President of the Court Grand Chamber of the European Court you violate: Article 18 Scope restrictions on the rights The restrictions permitted under this Convention to the said rights and freedoms shall not be applied for purposes other than those for which they are installed. The very first time I Kiparenko Alexander registered at the European Court 24lystopada 2006r.Zayava number 48896/06, I have not violated the terms?, But I answered that 06lyutoho2007r.Sud concludes that domestic remedies have not been used? ! forgive me Velmoshanovnyy Court, Alexander Kiparenko but I do not except addressed to the "Lord God"?, I gave you all the letters which I perechislyv vyschezhadano.Druhyy time I signed 05 veresnya2008r.Zayava number 52816/08, but the Court noted that the complaint relating to his competences?, but the application does not meet the eligibility criteria? May I ask you Velmoshanovnyy Court Grand Chamber of mutual understanding treat me Kiparenko Alexander, but I never work with trvnya 2004goda not getting neither pension that I earned in the State of Ukraine, which wiped at my feet .... and no paycheck?! I think you should fix consider my case in which numerous violations by the State of Ukraine in relation to me, Alexander Kiparenko! Article 35 Conditions of eligibility 1. The court may take the case to the consideration only after it had exhausted all domestic remedies, in accordance with generally recognized principles of international law, and within six months from the date on which the final decision was taken. 2. The court did not deal with any individual application submitted under Article 34 that: a) is anonymous Article 7 No punishment without law 1. No one shall be held guilty of any criminal offense on account of any act or omission which, at the time it was committed, did not constitute a criminal offense under national or international law. Nor shall a heavier penalty be imposed than the one that was applicable at the time the criminal offense. 2. This article shall not prejudice the trial and punishment of any person for any act or omission which, at the time it was committed, was criminal according to the general principles of law recognized by civilized nations. Article 13 Right to an effective remedy Everyone whose rights and freedoms as set forth in this Convention are violated shall have an effective remedy before a national authority notwithstanding that the violation has been committed by persons acting in an official capacity. O.M.Kiparenko
Posted on: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 19:52:20 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015