WHY EINSTEINS THEORY OF GRAVITY IS INCOMPLETE, LACKING, OR NOT - TopicsExpress



          

WHY EINSTEINS THEORY OF GRAVITY IS INCOMPLETE, LACKING, OR NOT TRULY FUNDAMENTAL: A falling man feels no gravity. The Universe is either contracting OR expanding. CLEARLY, the problem with Einsteins theory of gravity is as follows. Einstein never could explain gravitational and inertial equivalency and balancing. The modern physicists, in fact, admit that none of them can quite explain it. That is a fact that is admitted to. Einstein could never unite gravity and electromagnetism. Einstein never truly, basically, and fundamentally incorporated or explained instantaneity in his ideas either. Ultimately, position and position relative to distance in/of space have to BOTH be accounted for. Visible and invisible space must be in fundamental and ultimate equilibrium and balance. Regarding outer space, it is black; there is weightlessness; and we are not touching anything. Think about it. Outer space precludes and destroys our being, experience, and vision. In fact, we do not and CANNOT fully, directly, and truly/really/actually EXPERIENCE OUTER SPACE AS IT IS (including seen, felt, AND touched). Now, the falling man doesnt involve space as it is seen, felt, AND touched in conjunction with balanced and stabilized distance in/of space either. Physics and physical experience is fully and truly understood as it is seen, felt, AND touched. Indeed, we always begin with typical, shared, necessary, foundational/fundamental, ACTUAL/REAL, and ordinary experience(s) in establishing physical fundamentals and truths. The fundamental equivalency and balancing of gravity, inertia, and electromagnetism fundamentally and certainly involves us. This ALSO involves instantaneity in conjunction with half inertia and half gravity, stabilized and balanced distance in/of space, invisible and visible space in FUNDAMENTAL equilibrium and balance, and the MIDDLE distance in/of space. It all makes perfect sense. The above paragraph perfectly (and consistently) desribes the fundamental, theoretical, and ultimate requirements of unification of physics and physical experience. In fact, I have thoroughly and clearly proven that this fundamental, linked, natural, necessary, ultimate, and theoretical unification of physics (including actual physical experience) takes place in/as dream experience. Dream experience grows and increases, and dream experience is seen, felt, AND touched. Importantly, there is no outsmarting the genius of dreams. In dreams, we are conscious and alive in conjunction with the linked, separate, fundamental, and necessary experience of our growth and becoming other than we are. This necessarily and clearly involves a fundamental balance of being and experience in conjunction with the essential mastery of physics and physical experience. Importantly, dream experience IS possible/potential AND actual. Moreover, dreams fundamentally involve (and balance) the super important relation of something and nothing. What I have proven is NOT a theory. It is truth. It is the ultimate, fundamental, natural, extensive, balanced, actual, AND theoretical unification of physics and physical experience. Do any of you think that any of the mainstream, modern, academic physicists can contradict or disprove what I have written here? Not hardly. Can they show that it is inconsistent or incomplete? Can they contradict it with something that is truly, fundamentally, and extensively its equal? No, they cant; and they never will be able to. by Author Frank DiMeglio Finally, I give my sincere thanks to my publisher, Ms. Donna L. Quesinberry (CEO/President and Founder of DonnaInk Publications); as she has shown patience, temerity, concern, open-mindedness, resolve, good intentions, sharp insight, and good and common sense in moving forward with this very important work and the soon-to-be-released book.
Posted on: Sun, 17 Nov 2013 21:01:40 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015