We stretch this rubber way Big time. Do onto them, as they - TopicsExpress



          

We stretch this rubber way Big time. Do onto them, as they would have done onto you. The Queen’s Christmas Message 25th Dec 2010. Therefore all things whatsoeuer ye would that men should doe to you, doe ye euen so to them: for this is the Law and the Prophets. What does this mean, you might be asking? The Hight court of Australia has stated to the people of the Commonwealth of Australia, they can do the following actions, and this is inside of the law. In other words, all actions are lawful, because all the actions that you do, is according to law. What this is like, place you and I, inside a very big rubber band. The rubber band is international law. We stretch this rubber way Big time, tho we never ever brake the rubber band, Hence if you did: you have broken the law. One cant brake the law too enforce the law. What happens when you stretch the rubber band right and tight? People with social thinking, think that you have broken the law, they say all sorts of things. What do I say, If you think in any way, that I have broken the law in any way, please call the AFP and state your case, here is their number call 131 AFP (131 237) :-) Your legal authority, is set out in the matter of Amalgamated Society of Engineers v Adelaide Steamship Co Ltd (Engineers case) [1920] HCA 54; (1920) 28 CLR 129 (31 August 1920) - HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA. Start………… When the people of Australia, to use the words of the Constitution itself, “united in a Federal Commonwealth,” they took power to control by ordinary constitutional means any attempt on the part of the national Parliament to misuse its powers. If it be conceivable that the representatives of the people of Australia as a whole would ever proceed to use their national powers to injure the people of Australia considered sectionally, it is certainly within the power of the people themselves to resent and reverse what may be done. No protection of this Court in such a case is necessary or proper. Therefore, the doctrine of political necessity, as means of interpretation, is indefensible on any ground. The one clear line of judicial inquiry as to the meaning of the Constitution must be to read it naturally in the light of the circumstances in which it was made, with knowledge of the combined fabric of the common law, and the statute law which preceded it, and then lucet ipsa per se. ……………………………….. 1. united in a Federal Commonwealth 2. took power to control by ordinary constitutional means 3. resent and reverse 4. No protection of this Court in such a case is necessary or proper. 5. indefensible on any ground 6. read it naturally in the light of the circumstances 7. combined fabric of the common law, and the statute law End………………………… ??? Does Valid Government Exist in Australia ??? ASK, Crown: Servants: Australian Federal Police
Posted on: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 02:52:33 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015