Weve had a rash of this in the last few days... ********************************** PERFECT DESIGN ********************************** P1. Complication in and of itself is a flaw in design--a complicated design is flawed where a simpler design will do. P2. Flaws in a design are flaws of the designer. P3. An omnipotent or otherwise unconstrained designer could design an individual with just one multi-functional component, of whatever durability is required. C1. (Draw your own conclusions here) Intelligent Design is not a theory, it is not even an hypothesis. An hypothesis must be testable and falsifiable. ID is neither. ID is religious dogma. Creation Science is not science, it is likewise only religious dogma. It is not possible to get Creationism papers published in scientific journals, because it isnt science. Anyone here is free to believe in ID, or Creation Science, or both, and anyone is free to talk about their beliefs, and we encourage that, its what this forum is for. But if you use either term as if it is a scientific construct, then you need to know you are preaching your dogma; claiming your dogma is fact, and since you wont be able to show support for either dogma as being a scientific claim, I can see upon inspection that you are preaching...and preaching is against the rules. So dont do it. If its your belief, fine, just admit it and discuss from there. Dont call it a fact, because that cannot be supported.
Posted on: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 00:48:22 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015