When you want to know who’s really on what side of this - TopicsExpress



          

When you want to know who’s really on what side of this chapter of American history here’s a clue as where to look. Look at the investigations. If someone claims to be a Republican or a conservative and they’re unwilling to investigate wrong doing or allegations regarding a member of the opposite party – there’s something not right there. John Boehner doesn’t want to pursue impeachment of President Obama- something isn’t right here. When Michelle Bachmann made the observation that Hillary Clinton’s Deputy Chief of Staff as Secretary of State, Huma Abedin, has very real substantial ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and that she would like to investigate this further; John McCain shouted her down. Why would John McCain be opposed to something like this. It is public record that the Council on Islamic American relations (CAIR) and the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), were both found to be Muslim Brotherhood front groups and unindicted co-conspirators in the terrorist-funding trial United States v. Holy Land Foundation—had visited the White House, State Department, FBI, more times than you’d care to count It is also fact that Muslim “outreach” groups like CAIR and ISNA were able to purge hundreds of pages of “offensive” words and phrases like “jihad” and “Islamist” from FBI training materials. Something reminiscent of acts from the novel, 1984. But if you were to bring this up you were considered a Conspiracy Theorist, a kook. We have been trained into submission by political correctness. Pointing these things out offends Muslims, and people are only scared of offending Muslims because allegedly they go and blow things up when they’re offended. So when U.S. Army Lieutenant General (Ret.) William Jerry Boykin comes out and says that are connections between the Muslim Brotherhood in both the Pentagon and the Department of Defense does that make him a Conspiracy quack as well? We think not. As this video points out, Obama has surrounded himself with individuals with these connections in his White House. Was this on accident? There’s no way it could have been anything other than on purpose when you consider all the background checks one has to go through to get these positions. This being the case is nothing short of a treasonous act by Obama himself.
Posted on: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 22:54:31 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015