Why Mahatma Gandhi ji Not Elected Prime Minister of India? Is not the Conspiracy of Nehru?. Gandhi ji were highly qualified among all leaders as well as Great Thinker, Saint & having the total knowledge (Jnana (self Realized) of Social, Religious & Spiritual Activities of Indians & so forth , than Why He had not Elected Prime Minister Of India? *ॐ~Guru Tattwa, Prarbdha~ॐ* Is this the Conspiracy of India Government (P.M. 1948) who intentionally did no provided Security to Mahtama Gandhi as Given to Nehru who is residing near the Birla House? The fact is that before the actual assassination in 1948 there were several attempts on Gandhiji’s life from 1934. *ॐ~Guru Tattwa, Prarbdha~ॐ* If we will see the History of World in every country of World , where the Freedom for Independence fight by that leader became the Head of That Country i.e. President or Prime Minister i.e. From George Washington to Lenin, Nelson Mandela, Mao is given total P.M. ship to Communist Party & a had the total power with him. *ॐ~Guru Tattwa, Prarbdha~ॐ* AS the Time of Independence there are so many top leader like Sardar Patel, C. Raja Gopalchari, Rajendra Prashad, Abdul Kalam Azad, Bhim Rao Ambedler, Shyma Prasad Mukarji, Bidhan Chandra Rai, are present , but all of them are not like Gandhiji. Gandhiji were highly qualified among all leaders as well as Great Thinker, Saint & having the total knowledge (Jnana (self Realized) of Social, Religious & Spiritual Activities of Indians & so forth , than Why He had not Elected Prime Minister Of India? *ॐ~Guru Tattwa, Prarbdha~ॐ* Even Jawaharlal Nehru said in Parliament: “And today the fact that this mighty person whom we honoured and loved beyond measure, had gone because we could not give adequate protection is a shame for all of us..” *ॐ~Guru Tattwa, Prarbdha~ॐ* Are they ready to accept Sardar Patels ideology as Congress ideology? They have given up the ideology of Sardar Patel and Mahatma Gandhi, he claimed. Reacting to Gandhis comment that Patel banned the RSS in the wake of the Mahatmas assassination, Madhav said the ban was lifted after eight months. Patel did ban the RSS but within eight months he revoked the ban saying RSS had nothing to do with the assassination of Mahatma Gandhi, he added. Desh ko pata hai kaun kisko ullu bana raha hai.” The country knows who is making a fool out of whom. “Agar kisi ne Mahatma Gandhi ke vichaardhara ki hatya ki hai to wo Congress hai.” If someone has killed Mahatma Gandhis ideologies that is Congress since 67 years. On Rahuls take that BJP leaders dont even think about what Sardar Patels ideology was and never read about him or tried to understand him and now they want to build his statue, Madhav said, “Aaj inko (Congress) achanak Sardar Patel yaad aa gaye? Jab wo jivit the tabhi unki vichaar dhara ko tyaag dia tha inhone. Suddenly out of the blue theyve remembered Patel today. As long as he was alive Congress had shunned his ideologies),” Targeting Modi over his alleged attempts to appropriate Patels legacy by constructing the Statue of Unity of Indias first Home Minister, billed to be the worlds tallest, Rahul had today said, Patel had called RSS a poisonous ideology which will destroy Indias soul. Patel devoted his life to Congress and the poor. “The power of democracy of this country will show when a person from a weak section of the society will become PM.” Are they ready to accept Sardar Patels ideology as Congress ideology? They have given up the ideology of Sardar Patel and Mahatma Gandhi, he claimed. Reacting to Gandhis comment that Patel banned the RSS in the wake of the Mahatmas assassination, Madhav said the ban was lifted after eight months. Patel did ban the RSS but within eight months he revoked the ban saying RSS had nothing to do with the assassination of Mahatma Gandhi, he added. Earlier in the day, Rahul Gandhi accused Modi of of empowering himself and his disregard for transparency in governance. He (Modi) has spent his entire life in RSS and has nothing to do with the ideology of Mahatma Gandhi and Sardar Patel. Its (RSS) ideology killed Mahatma Gandhi and Sardar Patel proposed to ban it after that, Rahul said addressing a rally in Gujarat. Further on the comments of Congresss chief campaigner for Lok Sabha elections that one makes tea, the other drives taxi and another does farming but all deserve to be given respect barring one who makes fool of people, BJP leader Rajiv Pratap Rudy said, “Rahul ji talks without knowledge. He can take a dig at us but we are happy that our PM candidate was once a tea-seller.” *ॐ~Guru Tattwa, Prarbdha~ॐ* EARLIER ATTEMPTS TO MURDER THE MAHATMA ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The fact is that before the actual assassination in 1948 there were several attempts on Gandhiji’s life from 1934. The first was when Mahatma Gandhi was engaged in a nationwide tour against untouchability he went to Poona on 19th June 1934. On 25th June 1934 he was targetted with a bomb by the Hindutva fundamentalist. There was no question then either of the partition of the country or the 55 crores to be given to Pakistan. The incident of this bomb attack is mentioned by Pyarelal in his Last Phase Part II . Even more detailed information is given in D.G. Tendulkar’s Mahatma Part III. A bomb was thrown at Gandhi on 25th June 1934 when he was going to Pune Municipality conference hall to give his talk . In this bomb attack the chief executive of the municipality along with two police constables were seriously injured. Mahatma Gandhi escaped just because he was in the car behind. Pyarelal says the attack was well planned. The photos of Nehru and other congress leaders were found in the shoes of the attackers which means that the culprits were arrested. Thus before the bomb attack by Madanlal on January 20 1948 there was an earlier bomb attack. Most of the newspapers of the day published reports stating that the bomb attack was to kill Mahatma Gandhi. Even more significant was another attempt on Gandhi’s life at Matheran in 1944 when Nathuram was arrested when trying to assault Gandhiji with a sharp weapon at Panchgani near Pune as testified by Manishanker Purohit, the proprietor of the Surti Lodge in Pune before the Kapur Commission . It is pertinent to note in this context that Pyarelal testified before the Kapur Commission that the RSS had infiltrated in the police force. The then prime minister Jawaharlal Nehru wrote to the then home minister, Vallabhbhai Patel on 26th February 1948 that : “The RSS has infiltrated into our offices and the police force and therefore it is official secrecy cannot be maintained.” Sardar Patel replied the very next day on 27th February 1948 stating that “A group belonging to Hindu Mahasabha under the leadership of Sawarkar conspired to murder Mahatma gandhi and brought it to fruition.” (Sardar Patel’s Correspondence: Part 6, p.56.) There was another attempt on Gandhiji’s life when he was going by train from Bombay to Pune on 29th June, 1946. Between Neral-Karjat stations huge rocky stones were put on the railway tracks to cause accident. But due to the watchful railway driver L.M. Pareira the accident was averted but the engine was severely damaged. Pyarelal has written about this incident in the Harijan issue dated July 7, 1946. This train was known as Gandhi Special as testified by Pareira before the Kapur Commission. Mahatma Gandhi mentioned about this incident in his prayer meeting at Pune on 30th June, 1946. He said:” By god’s grace I have escaped safely from the very jaws of death. I have never hurt anybody, and I have enmity with none. I cannot understand why there should be so many murderous attempts on me. Yesterday’s murder attempt was a failure. I am not going to die so soon. I shall live hunddred and twentyfive years.” Having known personally Dr.Jagdish Chandra Jain, the Chief Prosecution Witness in the Gandhi murder trial I think I can say that the assassination was a well conceived conspiracy. One has only to read Dr. Jain’s book in Hindi ‘main Bapu ko na bacha saka’ in Hindi and ‘I could not save Bapu’ in English to understand the entire course of the conspiracy. The very persistence of this question is attended with unflattering implications for all concerned. There remains the nagging doubt that everything necessary was not done to ward off evil from the most precious life in the nation. And these terrible misgivings are substantiated by some important testimony to show that necessary precautions were not taken even when there was clear evidence of danger to the Mahatma’s life. There is the fervent testimony of Prof. J.C. Jain, chief prosecution witness in the Gandhi Murder Trial, which leaves no doubt that, having got a hint of the impending plan to murder Gandhiji from Madanlal, he (Jain) had apprised the then Bombay Government about the plan. Before that Madanlal had been involved in the bomb explosion at Gandhiji’s prayer meeting on January, 20,1948 which in any case, should have made the Government aware of the utter seriousness of the information given by Dr. Jain. What did the Government do on the information so received? Did it act in time to avert further danger? It says at did. The Government’s defence was that whatever information they got from Dr. Jain on January 21, 1948. was conveyed to the authorities in Delhi. And what did the Delhi police do? In this connection the remarks made by Justice Atmacharan, Judge of the Spcial Court, Red Fort, are revealing. Justice Atmacharan said: “ I may bring to the notice of the Central Government the slackness of the police in the investigation of the case during the period between January 20 and 30 1948. The Delhi Police had obtained a detailed statement from Madanlal soon after his arrest on January 20, The Bombay Police had also been reported the statement of Dr. J. C. Jain that he made to the Honorable Morarji Desai on January 21. The Delhi Police and the Bombay Police had contacted each other soon after these statements had been made, Yet the police miserably failed to derive any advantage from these two statements. Had the slightest keenness been shown in the investigation of the case the tragedy probably would have been averted.” These strictures bring home the fact that there was something seriously amiss with the protection measures accorded to the Mahatma. What cannot be denied is that the Government plainly failed to appreciate the grave implications of the situation that had arisen in the wake of the bombing attempt on January 20, particularly in the light of prior information given by Dr. Jain. The slackness of the police becomes all the more inexplicable when one considers the aftermath of the bomb explosion. It is very important to note that Madanlal made a confession overnight to the Delhi Police in which he gave the full details of the conspiracy. More important still is the fact that the Delhi Police sent Madanlal’s statement to the Bombay Police by the evening of January 21. How precisely the Bombay Police reacted to this statement is not clear. But in view of the subsequent course of events culminating in the murder on the event.. of January 30, one fact emerges clearly—that the Bombay Police were not alert in acting upon information supplied by Madanlal’s statement. In his memoirs published in the book “The Civil Servant in India” Mr R.N. Banerjee, then Secretary for Home Affairs in the Union Government, has made a reference to this incident. He says: “Both Godse and Apte could have been found and nabbed in one of their two Bombay haunts on the 23rd. Unfortunately, nobody took any action on this statement of Madanlal, and the Delhi Police did not even remind the Bombay police. The Delhi magistracy and the Home Secretarial remained ignorant of the statement (as head of the Delhi Police never kept them informed) till the world was staggered by the ‘Hay Ram’ shot on the 30th evening.” All the available evidence strongly suggests that the Government failed to protect Gandhiji when it could have done so. The stock excuse provided Government for inadequately security measures is that Government did not like persons attending prayer meetings to be scared. But this excuse is untenable. It should have been perfect possible to apply security measure without Gandhiji’s knowledge. In fact, it is perfectly reasonable to assume that if the security measures adopted to protect other leaders at that time had been applied to Gandhiji the murder could never have taken place. This is one of the points stressed in a recent book published in Lisbon entitled “Who Killed Gandhi?” by Lourenco de Salvador who is a Goanese by birth and has settled in Portugal. He claims to have been a life-long follower of Gandhiji. The book was printed privately and has been reviewed in a recent issue of the Times Literary Supplement. It is unlikely that the book will find entry in India. The author admits that ‘the murder (quoted from the above review-not in the author’s words) came as a great shock to everyone but the fanatics: the grief of the Congress leaders was sincere and genuine.. but he (de Salvador) sticks to the point that it need never have happened. The review also says that “there were certain aspects of the trial of Godse which de Salvador thinks partook of the nature of a cover-up exercise, and he masters evidence for the view that some important testimony was not made public.” Even Jawaharlal Nehru said in Parliament: “And today the fact that this mighty person whom we honoured and loved beyond measure, had gone because we could not give adequate protection is a shame for all of us..” *ॐ~Guru Tattwa, Prarbdha~ॐ*
Posted on: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 08:10:25 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015