Why do I use the neutral terms the people, the politic, and the economic? It makes analysis of complex problems a lot simpler; it makes choices a lot simpler to make, even makes choice itself possible. It is why, for example, I say the economic and politic should never dominate the public, why I say the politic should depend on agreement between the people (not representatives), why I say the economic should never dominate the politic, which is the social contract between the people, AND why I say no to a corrupted politic having been corrupted by an ideologizing AND people-disempowering economic. To be more specific, the marginalization of the people via privatization of the public sector, rips the throat out of the voice of the people. The economic is only a tool of trade and commerce, and should never hold ANY ideological weight whatsoever... like limiting the economic choices of the people. Use this triangle to help adjudicate in your mind the basics of what goes into your choice.
Posted on: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 17:02:13 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015