All ‘laws’ which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void. Marbury vs. Madison No one is bound to obey an un-Constitutional ‘law’ and no courts are bound to enforce it. 16 Am Jur 2d, Sec 177 late 2d. Sec 256constitution.org/uslaw/16amjur2nd.htm An un-Constitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed. Norton vs. Shelby County Where Rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be NO rule making or legislation which would abrogate them. Miranda v Arizona, U.S. Supreme Court, 384 US 436, 491 (1966). The claim and exercise of a Constitutional Right cannot be converted into a crime. Miller v U.S. 230 F 486, at 489 If a state converts a liberty into a privilege the citizen can engage in the Right with impunity. Shuttlesworth v Birmingham, U.S. Supreme Court. 394 U.S. 147 (1969). There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of this exercise of Constitutional Rights. Snerer v Cullen 481 F. 946. The maintenance of the Right to bear Arms is a most essential one to every free people and should not be whittled down by technical constructions. Tiche v Osborne, 131 A. 60. When any court violates the clean and unambiguous language of the Constitution, a fraud is perpetrated and NO ONE is bound to obey it. State v Sutton UN-Constitutional = Unlawful. Attempting to change Our Form of Government is High Treason = The Death Penalty - 18 USC, Part 1, Chapter 115, Sec.2381 And UCMJ Sec. 906, Art. 106
Posted on: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 17:23:43 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015