CHEMTRAIL fukUshima RELATIONSHIP Some of what he says is likely to be true. Who knows? I like the phrase that came up yesterday: lack of transparency. The key here is that weather radiation therapy is not likely to be exclusive. Neither is what he says about Monsantos trying to ensure their ROI by whatever means they require. When I got interested in GeoEngineering back in the autumn of 2013, I had been focusing on fukUshima. My understanding was as follows: 1) we already had high radiation from fukUshima Dr. Apsley, whom I have previous mentioned as the man in the know re the radiation two step: 1) get it out of the body, 2) regenerate tissue. Dr. Apsley estimated September 2013 that 14,000 people had died from FukUshima radiation in the US because of the tremendous plume in California in Summer of 2012 plus a steady flow of radiation since the meltdown on March 11, 2011. 2) other researchers said a flood of radiation would begin in January 1014 and increase continually. Most of Hawaii would be unlivable by Jan. 2015; most of Alaska would be unlivable by 2016 and California would be unlivable by 2017. 3) if the fukUshima tilted building slipped or they mishandled the thousand odd fuel rods while moving them then additional catastrophe would result and perhaps all the northern hemisphere would be severely affected 4) so radiation is already strong here. on report I thought was reliable out of Sacamento said as the radiation increased the gov was raising the consumption safety level to stay above the reported current level. 5) Obomber, who has always been in hock to the nuclear industry, is doing his best to get the new nuclear reactor built quickly to satisfy his nuclear energy masters. He, apparently, was responsible for shutting off all fukUshima news reaching the people in the US. Does all that mean that the HAARP and Chemtrail mission as we currently understand it does not exist. Not at all. fukUshima probably slowed them down a bit they continue. 1) The new hole in the Ozone layer over the US isssssss NEW. That neither HAARP nor chemtrsails are responsible is risible and highly unlikely. 2) People are still getting autism, dementia, parkinsons, alzheimers at an increasing rate. 3) It is unlikely the government fell in love with you or feels bad about how you have been treated. Simply because their prior philandering with stuff that hurts you indicates they never loved you. 4) I dont want to get the hyenas howling but so much incontrovertible evidence that 9/11 was perpetrated by far more people than a few Arabian camel herders still looks us gullible folks in the face. For example: a) why was the presence of a category 3 hurricane off the coast of New York soft peddled and soft pedaled in the news b) what made the hurricane make a 90 degree right turn to avoid hitting New York? Was it HAARP or was it nature c) as technology has improved so has 9/11 evidence continued to come up and so have previously identified problems with the govs story been made more reliable. SO, MY TAKE IS THIS. I APPRECIATE WHAT THIS IOWAN SAYS. I THINK IT IS LIKELY SO BUT BACK IN THE FALL I WAS SAYING THAT IT COULD BE THAT THE WORST THING THAT COULD HAPPEN MIGHT BE A HEAVY RAIN IN CALIORmIA. Again I appreciate this story but I dont see it as the whole story and I dont see how the news really changes things. Whatever, we are still twixt Scylla and Charybdis.
Posted on: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 15:49:26 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015