Every time I watch an interview between certain scientists or - TopicsExpress



          

Every time I watch an interview between certain scientists or atheists(non-militant ones) and religious person. Scientists are always cornered by a counter-firecan you disprove the existence of God? Then the flying spaghetti monster case will appear and the whole thing ends up In a big laugh. My question is, why the scientific group has the obligation to provide any sophisticated evidence on the disprove side? Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, a book written 2000 Years ago is already inadequate in the first place, then why demanding a logical aesthetic, perhaps even theological evidence to disprove the existence of God can be considered fair trade? youtu.be/U0Xn60Zw03A
Posted on: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 07:10:33 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015