Flat Fee Legal Assistant Retainer Caps Federal Crime Claimant Costs State & Federal Actions youtu.be/8kLRMmA3GOA 03/07/14. This is a respectful announcement of policy decision to raise our flat fee retainer from $2,250 for two claimants seeking pro se legal remedies, document production, research and crime victim compensation about any number of the same injured kidnapped for profit loved ones - to $3,500 to better cover the actual operating costs taking advantage of the forms options that become available when we actually get into moving compliantly in the District/Courts. Anyone who has returned notarized signed flat fee retainer agreement and has not been able to make regular partial payments to satisfy the $2,2250, will receive a full statement of services rendered to date billed hourly and by cost of task and we will terminate our obligations to that claimant in that agreement. This of course does not apply to those few claimants who took the time to actually read the retainer contract and work with me to customize it so that 3, 4 and 5 claimants could be added for an additional $500 each and of course those are the same claimants who paid at least half to enable costs to be covered for the research the case law research the state law research and building a viable effective filing into the Federal Court which holds hope of restraining a legally malpracticing state court while we actually find a states Department of Health and Human Services records mis-management Court-ordered abuse missing and exploited child. I will remove the $2,250 flat fee retainer which obligated me to begin gathering your evidence and marking trial prep exhibits with a deposit of $500.00 before I go to speak in D.C. April 10, 2013. If anyone wants the benefit of full services described in my teaching segment video below concurrent research compliance document production in both state and federal actions for the old $2,250 flat fee retainer that person must satisfy the full balance $2,250 so we can stop floundering around impotent and get into the competitive processes surrounding child rescue. These are the things a person is able to do in the District Court that require the additional costs for acting competitively to not only meet the federal courts calendar and deadline requirements but to perform professional process server or bonded security personnel surveillance and/or insured task force escort of a minor back to the jurisdiction of the federal judge who has the medical evidence that the childs welfare is legal malpractice of a state court judges so-called dependency, paternity or custody. We can with the same filing fee to enter Complaint in federal court, REMOVE a States department of human services adoption so the exact nature of the federal suit as shown in the averments of the complaint is personal injury. This is important because each state will have a statute of limitations that expires about an adoption and the federal court will have a statute of limitations on personal injury which has not expired if the Claimants bring the Federal Lawsuit personal injury starting at the date when the un-noticed or unjustified transport of the children away from the the kinship care provider or other able family member occurred. We can do habeus corpus (produce the live healthy body of the essentially missing and reasonably expected exploited children), we can pay not only the federal court fee for Subpoena produce witnesses, records and things and permit inspection (and we shall subpoena inspection of every placement shown in the Department of Human Services records the child was held until produced live and healthy before a federal judge). We must pay professional process servers to return affidavits of proof of service into the courts docket and most important, I think is we need pay professional licensed bonded security personnel, retired or off duty criminal justice professionals who have their own investigator personal and event security qualifications to perform surveillance and enter the CV qualifications as expert witnesses who will show up and testify of how they were given facts and evidence by Roxannne Grinage HireLyrics Administrative Services that the child or children they transported under insured protective conditions back to the federal judge in the jurisdiction where there is evidence on record that they were infact acting in an authentic child protective function.
Posted on: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 12:31:34 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015