Megyn Kelly has a serious talent for reducing people to what they are. Although there may be some constitutional point buried in the AHAs argument, you dont attack good traditions which benefit children because it offends you. I believe in separation of church and state. After all, you dont ever want the government in bed with the church because it opens the way for abuses on both sides. When you add poison to wine, it all becomes poison. I get it. I understand the constitutional perspective. We dont want government enforcing religion and we dont want religion corrupted by government. But at some point we have to ALLOW for religion in the lives of children and there is a very good reason why. This reason supercedes what religions claim to offer under their own merits. One can argue that many religions provide their own self-enforcing basis for following them. Most of them provide their own exclusivity of truth. They self-reference. They contain that which may be viewed objectively by outsiders as assumptions and enforce those assumptions as truth. But one thing many atheists and agnostics do not understand is that based on evidence--for protestant Christians, Mormons, Catholics, Taoists, Hindus, and Buddhists at least--universal standards of behavior, morality, and ideology are reenforced by these beliefs. They ground people in PROPER PRINCIPLE. Children need this more than anything, especially in this backwards and highly ambiguous age of morals. I have said it before and I will say it again. Our society is failing because it is Godless. No matter what we may personally believe, until children learn on their own to find the proper and self-evident unalterable principles that make a person good, we MUST allow them exposure to good religions. - Aaron foxnewsinsider/2013/11/22/video-megyn-kelly-takes-american-humanist-association-head-after-school-christmas-toy
Posted on: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 20:12:31 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015