Paragraph VII Rest of my argument was to show you how the New - TopicsExpress

Paragraph VII Rest of my argument was to show you how the New Testament differentiates between God and Jesus every time. Instead of showing that there is no differentiation whatsoever Melanie gives us extra-Biblical interpretation which one is not bound to agree with. With her other explanations Melanie (Christians as a whole) commits the fallacy of equivocation where you use an argument where a word refers to something and down below when somebody doesn’t notice the word refers to something else. Melanie starts with the word Jesus referring to God-man, then later on the word Jesus refers only to a man and later when you ask again it refers to the God-man again. One moment it refers to God, the next moment it refers to the Son of God, next moment it refers to both of them. We have to define our terms, what refers to what.

The following field notes were provided by refuge volunteer Don

Cracking myself up laughing!!! Caitlyn just askes me how Honey

Monsieur Le PrésiGland, Je suis très fier de savoir que vous

life can be a series of costless luxuries. Singing without an

على صفحاتنا كل مفيد وجديد ♥ أكبر

Since it is Veterans Day, please watch this. In the time it takes

10 And I said, What shall I do, Lord? And the Lord said unto me,

BE VIGILANT BUT DONT JUMP INTO CONCLUSION*** I was on my way to

Come Again, sweet love doth now invite is a song by John Dowland.

☁ ☀ ☁ Frontier Organic Whole Cinnamon Sticks, 1.28 Ounce by

The earth that made the rose, She also is thy mother, and not I.

Here is an idea. Complete the following notice, laminate it, stick