Shall send this to PM and all his ministers and senators in next few days QUOTE: ATTENTION TO: All Liberal Ministers, senators and the Prime minister, Copy supplied to all National security, Islamism, and migration / citizenship matters Hon. Prime Minister, Senators & Ministers, As you are all aware, recent Muslim Issues have started causing problems and big divides, in fact so much so that during my time as a main player PUP, I was getting huge volumes of people wanting me to take these issues on, I resigned that dying party and started my own party with a main platform on these Muslim divides. However, what will become important to you all very soon, is the capacity for the following to take large scale votes off your party, such as, Pauline Hanson, Jacqui Lambie, Rise up Australia and a few others but also my party the Secure Australia Party secureaustraliaparty. Furthermore, if you all think ahead, you can either lose votes from them or gain votes by earning their support via preference deals for taking action on an issue all these parties seek action upon on behalf of concerns of the majority of voters. I highly commend your party for being the most willing to take a stand on some of the issues I am about to raise, and also your immigration stances, and the preferences from all the aforementioned shall assure your re-elected but will grab a majority vote from voters win-win. I am about to break most your political corrected attitudes and ask you all to start supporting George Christensen and Cory Bernardi as they have been keeping in touch with the general public on these issues and receiving huge public support and many requests to push harder. I have solutions for these issues and ask you all to take the time to read it all then discuss it among yourselves for serious consideration. Let me find a starting point, Muslim is not a country or a race, it is not even a culture or religion, it is a mere label word like diggers is to soldiers The constitution per section 116 forbids everyone not just Government, from forcing the recognition or beliefs of any religion using great foresight The constitution expects all residents to take up allegiance and citizenship as individuals not as a race, culture, religion or cult, and our migration policy echo’s this, however, when considering Muslim applications in regards to fitting into these themes of allegiance and citizenship and fitting in with the fabric of society, it is a known fact, they fail these criteria, firstly, because they are forbidden by the Koran and mosque leaders from pledging allegiance and from applying for citizenship unless the country is under Muslim control. Furthermore, they are forbidden to recognise our laws if they conflict with sharia law which was created from the Koran scripts, and already these conflicts are causing huge divides, inclusive of halal concerns by the majority of Australians. You are all also aware, their pre entry history is one of unrest, civil wars and barbaric sharia laws, hence of late a big beheading massacre in progress even as close by as Indonesia. The AUSTRALIAN PUBLIC ARE BLAMING GOVERNMENTS FOR ALLOWING ALL THIS, SO DO I.. However, we realise it would be far worse under the ALP and Greens. Why they do not intend to fit in as Australians, is because the Koran specifically instructs them to take over all countries, remove Christians and force conversion, surely you are all not blind to this getting out of control in France, Norway, Italy and 6 other countries including the UK. It is a takeover attempt and sudden push everywhere. Thereby recently I wrote to all those leaders, and our PM included, and since then some of them have decided to take on some of the strong actions I suggested to them, and we need do the same here. All the things listed thus far breach section 116 of the constitution and our core migration criteria’s and they are forbidden to change. Muslim is a cult, this is a fact, and per national security mosques already evidence similar in structure to scientology cult, it’s mosque leaders get told by a council what to politically preach to their people in mosques, which are, all the aforementioned, and in breach of sect 116 again. The mosques invoke sharia punishments upon those whom breach, thereby Fatima Mohammad decides to take up Australian citizenship and be one of rare few whom wants to fit in in our country, she then breaches sharia law pertaining to allegiance and citizenship so can be severely punished, in which is illegal here but we allow it to exist. There are times the executive have to make a decision if a certain cult like Muslim is suitable to coexist here and without division, the answers are already concrete they cant and don’t. You can take the spineless way out by just stopping middle east visa’s without announcing it, but this requires more than just that, and if the changes were made, then people will fear to Vote ALP in knowing they will restart it all again. Our constitution does not recognise any religion nor dared to choose one for us all, so strongly, that it did not even bother to define what constitutes a religion so as to prevent us ALL from having us forced to recognise any. Therefore the words Islamic, Muslim, and halal are never to be given any status in Australia, but the individuals can be if so desired. Tony Abbott increased security because of Muslim risks, he further stated, we cannot tell who is who and whom is a potential terrorists. We had a jihad attack on a local and federal police officer in Victoria, attempted murder luckily hampered but serious injuries sustained, a shooting of Muslim by a Muslim outside a mosque, ISIL calls to its people in Australia to do random killings then the question of whom are good Muslims and who are bad. Well most are just sitting waiting for the orders from mosque leaders; of late it is to globally start pushing for power as we see here and overseas all start about the same time, thus a total national security risk. But most importantly we must face the fact, that the teachings in mosques are cult teachings as well as Koran, and this is abided by them all under Koran and sharia, that is a fact, and it is very clear every one of their future intentions are preached daily in mosques in breach of our safety and national security as aforesaid in so far as: • They are to take over all countries and kill or convert Christians, and right under our noses in war zones • They are not to pledge allegiance unless the country is under Muslim control • They are not to become citizens of any country unless under Muslim control • They are to breach any laws inconsistent with sharia law And so on, and not one of these qualify for migration criteria but we just keep bringing in huge volumes of them because they control upper areas in the immigration department, also most migration agents are ex immi staff and many visa’s granted via kickback $. This I know for certain but not relevant here. Okay, for any pro Muslim minister or senator, let me challenge you with the following compatibility test for visa applicants, in which I ask you all to consider adopting in visa applications and to the current citizenship amendments. 1. are you prepared to pledge allegiance to Australia 2. are you prepared to take up Australian citizenship within 12 months of arrival 3. Are you prepared to abide by Australia’s laws and no other outside laws 4. are you prepared to accept others religious beliefs such as Christians etc All Muslims are not allowed to agree with any of these things without either lying or genuinely wanting to break away from the cult, but to lie shall see them get sharia reprisals so not too likely. Any one of these questions that fail, is a fail to fit in harmoniously and can be rejected We must legislate that all current citizen agree to take up citizenship within 12 months or be deported or lose all rights of recognition for govt services and benefits, and if they too can’t answer question 1 to 4 they fail also. Australian’s feel this is very fair and ensures only people prepared to fit in and not create divides are worthy to be allowed the privilege to stay here. If we don’t, we shall very fast see what happened in other countries of late as well as big anti Muslim protest like each one of those countries has right now. Why wait till your pressured to act, why not earn voters likes by doing it as your own initiatives and for the sake of national security and harmony, As this issue shall grow, as the Koran and mosques preaching it are teaching them to get ready to take over Australia as the Koran instructs them to do here and in all countries, this is why the middle east has been in wars for centuries. I have studied all this in depth, I reside in one of our highest Muslim populace suburbs and I do know what their plans are for Australia. I know this is a bit long but is essential so please read at leisure, one is an example of facts how recognition of Muslims and their activities cant work here, the other is a basic run down on their current push. Halal has to be stopped nationally but not for import / exports. As a non Muslim, I can sell my car as halal and nobody can do a thing about it, as halal is open to all as is based upon personal belief, just like me saying I believe I’m a genius. The constitution under 116 says I can deem halal, Muslims, and Islamic and sharia as invented lies or illusion as I do, as never been part of this culture, it dont make sense, it defies humanity and its alleged god a fantasy but I accept people to fall for that stuff I deem as bullshit, just like patients with delusions we cant deny in their minds they really think their thoughts are true. It is my right of belief that mosques are trained to brainwash people with sharia punishment if caught not complying. Tomorrow I can make cakes and sell them as halal, nobody can do a thing about it, I can even certify it as halal, and if some cult challenges it in court they will have no legal standing. I can change my name to halal by deed poll so can every halal protestor and nobody can stop me, and then as a real identified halal, ill be more qualified to speak on what halal really is...Nobody can stop me tomorrow from canvassing businesses to buy halal certificates off me as I do not have to comply to any religion, as I am entitled to believe everything and anything is halal..No country or race owns the word halal. but unlike Muslims if I made money off certificates I’d have to pay tax on it why don’t they...I can as a non Muslim on/off say I believe I’m a Muslim, its not a country, race, or religion, its a descriptive word, per sect 116 I do not have to recognize that word, but am entitled to make my own interpretation of it, so at any given time I can say I am Muslim, and when I do, ill get pray time a pray room, no interest on loans, can kill animals without stunning them, can cover my head in banks, can demand swimming pool privacy, because I demand it as a right...I can change my name to Allah or Mohammad nobody can stop me, I can lay claim as a Muslim god, as long as in my mind I really believe I am, I can threaten everyone to obey and believe me because I can invent my own form of sharia to enforce it, nobody can stop me until something breaks a real law....I can challenge the Allah and say I’m the real one as Im alive and actually exist, I can revolutionize the middle east, its like having a federal election...Nobody can force anyone to believe in any religion in AUSTRALIA OR RELIGIOUS BELIEFS, it is forbidden, I urge all Australian companies to put a halal sticker on any food just because I SAY SO, as I dont ask you to do any procedure to qualify...cant be confusing if everything says halal, as my new found religion says anything and everything is halal, even my car. This I really BELIEVE is true. Take legal advice on these, it shall expose why Government is currently breaching sect 116 by Govt and its agencies gifting legislated concessions to Muslims under the claim of religion including halal which cannot be recognised as it is claimed to be done as a religious practice. Islam is a cult being alleged as a religion Islam operates fully via Sharia and the Koran in unison, all that’s in the sharia comes from the Koran, so to simplify this, we shall say Koran is sharia in these texts for that reason. In Australia, per our constitution, no religion of any type can be thrust or forced upon us. However, simple things like government or its agencies supplying prayer time and payer rooms for Muslims to pray, this defies and breaches our constitution, moreso to the extent that a govt agency recognised and acted upon a religious ground. One may say it does not affect non Muslims, but any space in any govt building could be put to more relevant use, and suddenly all other religions want pray space and buildings run out of room The prayer and use of these rooms may reasonably offend other religions, or say, hey you can do this freely in your homeland, you have to decide to go to the homeland of Islam or not be able to practice it here, which will be countered by saying: This country is ours we are in the process of taking control of it as we deem it ours already. A Mexican stand-off. Of late we see them pushing for many extreme things and extreme powers in which all these years we lived without. Our constitution section 116 protects us from any form of religious demand, it also gives every Australia a right to refuse to recognise any or all religions, we do not need a referendum on that. It cannot be adjudicated as an official religion, as the constitution does not feel the need to even determine what is a valid religion or not, otherwise every person can invent their own and make crazy claims and exemptions for or about it. Governments already breach the constitution even in govt departments and regulations but what about private companies breaching it? Does woollies have a right to add a religion to its company or operations, will it offend other religions whom can claim their rights under the constitution to dispute it, is the company able to be deemed a part of that religion to give it a right to exercise that religions beliefs and actions, no it can not, as a company is not a human nor does a company vote, nor is religion related to that company as a matter of fact. Why would a company adopt religious themes? It does it to lure a religions custom, but did it consider that might be divisive, was it a necessity or creating one, taking note none of this was occurring with the first Muslim arrivals and they lived and shopped no different than anyone else. We go to a Coles store, for example Glenroy Victoria, a sign says halal meat, so what if my belief was against halal meat and now it has stopped me from buying meat, what right does a company have to decide this on us all? But it goes beyond that, because the company selling it has to take other religious Islamic sharia actions, it has to ensure a Muslim slaughtered it and blessed it, it has to use special questionable animal cruelty laws exemption from compulsory stunning of the animal. Sharia law 1) we are to be forced to buy halal only by company Sharia law 2) we are forced to employ Muslims in contravention of employment discrimination and constitution breach via using a religion as exemption grounds Sharia law 3) the meat has to be blessed by a Muslim whereby no certificate exists to evidence anyone as a Muslim and shall offend other religions grossly whom feel their blessing is sinful Sharia law 4) we are forced to breach cruelty laws to exempt Muslims only in regards to being cruel to animals by exemption for stunning, this contravenes several things because our laws are equal to all, we cannot say one can commit a crime based upon religion but all others cant and shall be punished for doing the same thing. A very divisive situation Sharia law 5) we must certify the meat by payment for a religion certificate, again breaches sect 116 and cannot guarantee beyond reasonable doubt that fee wont be recouped in the price of meat at any stage or several stages of the process, and do know it funds this cult to grow bigger. And possibly fund terror cells. So Coles has caused for example 5 sharia laws to be forced and impinged upon us Halal is a fraud, this I can factually state, Halal to do with animal offal meat produce, is the draining method of its blood and how it is slaughtered, the latter breaches laws as stated by the RSPCA. But we see chocolate and plastic cups with halal labels whereby no slaughter, no meat and no blood to drain, so why pay for a misleading certificate, what was their motive to pay for something one does not need? Because they are Muslim company owners? Or to fool Muslims which risks a death penalty from them under sharia jihad for lying, just as they threatened jihad upon Cadbury. THREATENING ANY COMPANY IS ILLEGAL IN THAT MANNER We do not need such cult threats to person or companies. All these constitutional breaches and many more, and all these religious things forced upon us in ignorance of others beliefs and offends Christians and their beliefs, and things like halal are outright claimed as a religious issue not a cultural one, thereby clearly contravenes ELIGIBLE govt adoption per sect 116. Has Coles in fact become a form of mosque, whom can deny it if I were to claim it? I could go on about all the other divisive Muslim, sharia, Islamic themes but just all the above is more than enough to paint all the rest as invalid in Australia. As for companies, maybe boycott the company not the product, then producers will have trouble finding a sale outlet, for example aldi says it does not follow halal controls. If we enforce our constitution as obligated to do, then most Muslim invasive issues will be cut off at the knees. So how can Govt be prosecuted for breaching the constitution itself, an untested situation as only the Muslims have ever made govt breach it in such way. A government is deemed invalid if it breaches the constitution as its very existence is based upon adherence to it, thereby via coup, another party prepared to obey it can cease control of government. Why should the high court decide such breach when no power to do anything if breach is found, therefore has to conclude a government in breach, is itself invalid as it is governed under it. The high court cannot even change the constitution, only a referendum can, but we had no say in its breaches of sect 116 Why are governments letting Muslims control them in such ways, how do we determine this, is it kickbacks? Vote buying? Or just ignorance of its own people. We must ensure 116 is complied to, and many things will cease overnight, and anyone is free to leave Australia any time they like under our rules. What next, some other religion changes how we process grain and creates profit making certification, where does it stop. Or like the burqa exemption discriminating upon all other races that are banned, what next, one race can carry guns in the street but everyone else can’t, again, where does it stop, EXEMPTIONS ARE DIVISIVE, be them animal killing laws, headgear security laws and all the many other exemptions govt has granted Muslims under the guise of religion not culture, in clear breach of 116. This rubberstamps a Muslim leader to any day now claim religion of theirs entitles them to take over govt and be the PM, AS THEY SEEM TO HAVE THE CONTROL OVER GOVT ALREADY… Will Govt then try use sect 116 then? I hereby ask your consideration to make the following be legislated A customary change in visa countries to grant other countries their fair go for a few years and no more Middle East visa grants from known Muslim cult nations. The aforementioned test questions incorporated in visa applications to determine suitability to fit in here The introduction of mandatory citizenship of all residents within a 12 month period and also subject to the aforementioned test questions and evaluations Strict adherence to section 116 of the Australian constitution Non recognition of what is claimed a religious act, of halal, the word and its acts are not to be recognised per 116 It may even not be valid to recognise for import / export as unlike seeds it’s a religious act, However, I feel it is fine to allow it for import/export as long as certification is free. I sincerely thank you for your time and consideration, and shall forward a copy to Jacqui, Pauline, rise-up and a copy on my founded party website, and associated media contacts. Brian Woods
Posted on: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 09:41:03 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015