So I have seen this video posted several times and I never watched it because I knew it was going to be some prick who didnt know what he was talking about trying to act like he did. I was not wrong in my assumption. Mr. Creationist says: https://youtube/watch?v=FxBASNmg4AY 1. Evolution is not a science because it has never been observed. Although evolution has not been observed directly there is still evidence of it. Through DNA you can trace similarities of different animals back to a common ancestor. In fossils you see older animals lower in the earth than newer/evolved animals. 2. Evolution is just theory. He is right there, evolution is just a theory. So is gravity, general relativity, and a lot of other sciences that are just a theory and therefor do not really exist or are testable... Read more about theorys here. science.kennesaw.edu/~rmatson/3380theory.html 3. The Scientific model of the world defies the Laws of Thermodynamics. The law that he is referring to is the Second LoT: A system will always go to a state of equalizing entropy, or order. When you look at the earth being the system, yes it may seem that things evolving from one cell organisms to multi-celled organisms is a bit contradicting to this. But if you take the entire universe as they system a small change in one place makes no impact on the entirety of the system. I know that isnt a really good explanation but oh well. Satying on this point, Mr Creationist makes it clear that the Laws of Thermodynamics are unbreakable and therefor evolution is a sham. By his own logic so would creationism. Creating things from nothing would also not abide by the laws of physics. Creating Eve from mud and Adams rib would also be creating order from a disordered state. 4. The Junkyard..... There is no way that a Lamborghini would be made from a tornado going through the junkyard. No one would argue that. However if a tornado went through a Lamborghini factory and created a new lambo though that is plausible, still not going to happen in a million year. but given a long enough time, it could. You cannot argue that it could. Just as life didnt instantly appear, it took billions of years for chemical compounds to arrange in just the right way. Given a long enough timeline anything can happen. 5. Earth is an accident. See above responses for starters. Life on earth is just a random coincidence. The reason why earth is perfect for life as we know it is because it is the only life we know! If life was on a moon of Saturn that has lakes of methane we would be saying the same thing... Good thing God decided to put life here because trying to live on earth would be impossible. The reason earth is perfect for life is because that is how we evolved. What about the Ice ages? That isnt conducive for current human life, but the earth still went through it and still is going to go through another one. If we were Intelligently Designed, we would have been designed to evolve. 6. Universe. Uni-Latin-Single Verse-English-spoken words Uni-Latin-Single Versus-Latin-Turned Universe-Latin-Combined As One, Whole Dont make up you etymology as you go along. So everyone who thinks this guy just destroyed evolution is equally bind to science. For a more detailed Evolution VS Creation debate might I suggest: https://youtube/watch?v=z6kgvhG3AkI&feature=kp
Posted on: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 03:24:52 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015