Stu Ronaldson Stu Ronaldson 6:34pm Jan 29 FALSE ARGUMENT AGAINST THE PEOPLES GRAND JURY: Legal experts say that in 1946, the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (FRCP) were established, doing away with the common law grand jury model. The Peoples Response: 1) Interestingly, the Supreme Court legal experts disagree --- “The Court of Appeals rule would neither preserve nor enhance the traditional functioning of the grand jury that the common law of the Fifth Amendment demands” - 1990, U.S v. Williams 2) US Inc. statutes fall below the authority of the Constitution and the People ---“The power of grand juries to inquire into the willful misconduct in office of public officers, and to find indictments or to direct the filing of information’s in connection with such inquiries, shall never be suspended or impaired by law.” New York Constitution Article 1 §6 The FRCP rules are just that, they are rules. They do not have the power of the Constitution. No law or rule can circumvent the Constitution. The Constitution is the final law of the land. Unless the Constitution is amended by a 2/3rds majority vote of both the House and the Senate, the 5th Amendment speaks loud and clear. 3) Note that there is no supporting authorities given by the legal experts to support this lame claim 4) Legal experts are some of the villains perpetuating this fraud on the People, obviously they have a conflict of interest. Why would you consider them credible?
Posted on: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 05:10:23 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015