Those of you who are in the know about the truth of the Global assault of geoengineering will get a laugh out if this response to a Dane Wigington article I posted on Weather Underground. FYI, there is ZERO reputable evidence for geoengineering being implemented beyond the field trial proof-of-concept stage. Further, chemtrails are nonsense and HAARP is shut down. - contrailscience/what-in-the-world-are-they-spraying/ - contrailscience/how-to-debunk-chemtrails/ - contrailscience/ - earthsky.org/earth/crazy-weather-you-cant-blame-haarp-anymore#.UehILGS9Kc0 - washingtonpost/blogs/capital-weather-gang/wp/2013/08/16/weather-conspiracy-theories-scientifically-unjustifiable/ - wired/politics/security/magazine/17-08/mf_haarp?currentPage=all - davidsuzuki.org/blogs/science-matters/2013/09/conspiracies-fuel-climate-change-denial-and-belief-in-chemtrails/ - https://metabunk.org/threads/debunked-chemtrail-plane-interior-ballast-barrels.661/ - https://metabunk.org/threads/debunked-pilot-forgets-to-turn-off-chemtrails-while-landing-aerodynamic-contrail-wake-vortex.3551/ If the chemtrail conspiracy were true, millions of pilots would be needed to crop dust the American population. A typical crop duster might use seven ounces of agent diluted in seven gallons of water to cover one acre of land. Chemtrail “people dusters” would use a similar concentration to cover the entire United States, just to be safe. For 2.38 billion acres of land, the pilots would then need—for just one week of spraying—120 billion gallons of these cryptic chemicals. That’s around the same volume as is transported in all the world’s oil tankers in one year. And such an incredible amount of agent would need an incredible number of planes. Considering that a large air freighter like a Boeing 747 can carry around 250,000 pounds of cargo, at the very least, the government would need to schedule four million 747 flights to spread their chemicals each week—eighteen times more flights per day than in the entire US. Unless a plane could make multiple runs per day, a true chemtrail conspiracy would need 2,700 times as many 747s as have ever been constructed. - csicop.org/specialarticles/show/a_million_poisoning_planes 12) Is there any link between cloud seeding and chemtrails? No. The WMA is unaware of any connection between cloud seeding as is practiced by its members and to what some refer to as “chemtrails” (chemical trails). Atmospheric scientists even dispute the existence of “chemtrails”. What some chose to call chemtrails are actually “contrails” (condensed engine exhaust trails), which are well-understood atmospheric phenomena. Contrails are defined as “streaks of condensed water vapor created by an airplane or rocket at high altitudes.” These condensation trails are the result of normal emissions of water vapor, carbon dioxide, and some carbon-containing particulates from piston engines and jet engines at high altitudes in which, given the right atmospheric conditions, the water vapor condenses into a visible cloud. Actually, due to the very cold temperatures at high altitudes, the water droplets that initially form this cloud rapidly freeze, forming an ice cloud similar to naturally occurring cirrus clouds. Under certain conditions contrails can merge or contribute to the development of a larger area of cirrus clouds. Contrails are normally observed on otherwise clear days, when cloud seeding would not be conducted. The cloud seeding nuclei from ground or airborne sources do not produce such visible clouds. - weathermodification.org/faq.php Physicist David E. Thomas took a closer look at the KSLA report. Thomas notes: “The actual video clearly shows 68.8 ug/L (micrograms per liter), or 68.8 ppb (parts per billion)…. 68.8 millionths of a gram per liter corresponds to 68.8 parts per billion, (and) the reporter was off by a factor of 100 because he read the ’68.8′ as ’6.8.’ Ferrell overestimated the amount of barium in the test report by a factor of 100…. The test result was not ‘three times the toxic level set by the EPA’; it was around 30 times less than the EPA’s toxic limit.” So the alarming levels of barium that noted conspiracy theorist Jim Marrs cited as evidence of chemtrails was in fact a mistake created by a TV reporter’s poor math skills. - news.discovery/human/psychology/viral-video-claims-to-prove-chemtrails-conspiracy-140501.htm#mkcpgn=rssnws1 Note the Burden-of-Proof is on the claimant (you) to support it. Also note that conspiracy blogs, YouTube videos, pictures of the sky and newspaper articles are not credible. The burden of proof lies with someone who is making a claim, and is not upon anyone else to disprove. The inability, or disinclination, to disprove a claim does not render that claim valid, nor give it any credence whatsoever. - https://yourlogicalfallacyis/burden-of-proof Dozens of wingnuts have been confronted with this challenge. All have failed. And so will you.
Posted on: Fri, 16 May 2014 19:06:33 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015