-I DONT IMAGINE MANY WILL UNDERSTAND WHAT THIS IS- Affidavit- - TopicsExpress



          

-I DONT IMAGINE MANY WILL UNDERSTAND WHAT THIS IS- Affidavit- This is the one you need Notice of Understanding and Intent And Claim of Right By Freeman Jimmy Dennett in Freeman-On-The-Land society/community (Files) · Edit Doc Notice of Understanding and Intent Affidavit- Notice of Understanding and Intent And Claim of Right Respondent: Carol Skelton, The Right Honourable Member of Parliament for Saskatoon-Biggar-Rosetown, in The House of Commons. Claimant: Jackie-Grant-Vel’oice: Harper. Whereas it is my understanding Canada is a common law jurisdiction, and, Whereas it is my understanding equality before the law is paramount and mandatory, and, Whereas it is my understanding a statute is defined as a legislated rule of society which has been given the force of law, and, Whereas it is my understanding a society is defined as a number of people joined by mutual consent to deliberate, determine and act for a common goal, and, Whereas it is my understanding the only form of government recognized as lawful in Canada is a representative one, and, Whereas it is my understanding representation requires mutual consent, and, Whereas it is my understanding that in the absence of mutual consent neither representation nor governance can exist, and, Whereas it is my understanding all Acts are statutes restricted in scope and applicability by the Constitution Act, and, Whereas it is my understanding Section 32 of the Constitution Act limits it to members and employees of government, and, Whereas it is my understanding those who have a SIN (Social Insurance Number) are in fact employees of the federal government and thus are bound by the statutes created by the federal government, and, Whereas it is my understanding that it is lawful to abandon one’s SIN, and, Whereas it is my understanding men and women in Canada have a right to revoke or deny consent to be represented and thus governed, and, Whereas it is my understanding if anyone does revoke or deny consent they exist free of government control and statutory restraints, and, Whereas a Freeman-on-the-Land has lawfully revoked consent and does exist free of statutory restrictions, obligations, and limitations, and, Whereas I, Jackie-Grant-Vel’oice: Harper am a Freeman-on-the-Land, and, Whereas it is my understanding that acting peacefully within community standards does not breach the peace, and, Whereas it is my understanding that any action for which one can apply for and receive a license must itself be a fundamentally lawful action, and, Whereas as I am a Freeman-on-the-Land who operates with full responsibility and not a child, I do not see the need to ask permission to engage in lawful and peaceful activities, especially from those who claim limited liability, and, Whereas it is my understanding a by-law is defined as a rule of a corporation, and, Whereas it is my understanding corporations are legal fictions and require contracts in order to claim authority or control over other parties, and, Whereas it is my understanding legal fictions lack a soul and cannot exert any control over those who are thus blessed and operate with respect to that knowledge as only a fool would allow soulless fictions to dictate ones actions, and, Whereas it is my understanding peace officers have a duty to distinguish between statutes and law and those who attempt to enforce statutes against a Freeman-on-the-Land are in fact breaking the law, and, Whereas I have the power to refuse intercourse or interaction with peace officers who have not observed me breach the peace, and, Whereas permanent estoppel by acquiescence barring any peace officer or prosecutor from bringing charges against a Freeman-on-the-Land under any Act is created if this claim is not responded to in the stated fashion and time, Therefore be it now known to any and all concerned and affected parties, that I, Jackie-Grant-Vel’oice: Harper a Freeman-on-the-Land do hereby state clearly, specifically and unequivocally my intent to peacefully and lawfully; (1) Exercise my “common law right to travel”, unhindered, unencumbered at my discretion in my private conveyance of the day, to wit; my private, unregistered, unlicensed automobile. (2) Exercise my God given right to travel as stated in the Queen’s Bible. (3) Exercise my “common law right” to refuse to, obtain by submit ion; any application for any government issued license, permit or seek permission to perform any fundamentally lawful action or, enter into any government contract under duress, threat and /or intimidation which would involve committing an act of fraud and /or theft, or any other crime, by way of deception by “I” and /or any involved government principal, employee or agent. (in compliance with my Common Law Rights, the Magna Charta and the Criminal Code of Canada.) I claim that pursuant to any action by any government and/or any principal, member, employee, agent, servant, person thereof in Right of Canada, a province, or municipality; “I reserve my right not to be compelled to perform under any contract or commercial agreement that I did not enter knowingly, voluntarily and intentionally. And I do not accept the liability of the compelled benefit of any unrevealed contract or commercial agreement, which are my rights pursuant to Common Law”. Furthermore, I claim that these actions are not outside my community’s standards and will in fact support said community in our desire for truth and maximum freedom. Furthermore, I claim the right to engage in these actions and further claim that all property held by me under common law being; any and all intellectual property, real estate, trade tools, private automobile(s) and contents; contents at the private posted residence known as 1040-B 20th, Street West, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan are held under claim of right as mentioned in the Criminal Code of Canada. Furthermore, I claim that, the Crowns claim of; “All property reverts to the Crown for want of a competent heir”, as referred to in the escheats act, stands as a lawful claim and whereas, Canada is an insolvency, an estate, where everything is owned by God and currently held in trust under the Crown until a competent heir(s) shows up and lays a lawful claim of jurisdiction. Furthermore, I claim that the corporation known as “THE CROWN” and/or “HER MAJESTY QUEEN ELIZABETH II” and all human beings, acting as, persons, holding the subordinate position, [office of a person] in Canada are in fact deemed incompetent by all legal means and therefore require a legal trustee (third party to an action), to legally represent the incompetent one to any and all other corporate persons such as “The Courts of Saskatchewan” and/or “Government of Saskatchewan” etc. Furthermore, I claim that the intentional blurring of the lines with smoke and mirrors, deception, outright lie’s and too numerous to mention false claims as to the well settled division, between the Crown created legal entity known as the “PERSON” and the flesh and blood creation of the Creator known as a “man”, is nothing short of theft, fraud, breach of trust and forced slavery, a heinous criminal activity of the most odious form. Furthermore, I claim that “all persons, acting as, governments, principals, employees, agents and justice system participants claiming, “retained legal counsel” have, by virtue of their own and/or their principals actions, claimed “total incompetence”, in handling any of their own affairs in law and have become an instant ward of the court, hence, they are imprisoned by their own actions in hand or lack thereof. Furthermore, I claim that due to the self evident and the facts in truth at hand, that all persons, the Crown, governments, principals, employees, agents and justice system participants claiming limited liability or immunity are doing so under the pretence of being in fact deemed totally incompetent and under law made instant wards of the crown and/or court and therefore, cannot claim good faith or colour of right over anyone who is thus blessed to being a competent heir. Furthermore, I claim that, “Ignorance of the Law” is not a lawful or legal claim when used by the Crown, government principals, employees, agents and justice system participants at any and all levels to my harm or detriment, especially by those claiming limited liability. Furthermore, I claim that anyone who interferes with my lawful activities after having been served notice of this claim and who fails to properly dispute or make lawful counterclaim is breaking the law, cannot claim good faith or colour of right and that such transgressions will be dealt with in a properly convened court de jure. Furthermore, I claim that the courts in Saskatchewan are de-facto and bound by the Law and Equity Act and are in fact in the profitable business of conducting, witnessing and facilitating the transactions of security interests and I further claim they require the consent of both parties prior to providing any such services. Furthermore, I claim all transactions of security interests require the consent of both parties and I do hereby deny consent to any transaction of a security interest issuing under any Act for as herein stated as a Freeman-on-the-Land I am not subject to any Act. Furthermore, I claim my FEE SCHEDULE for any transgressions by peace officers, government principals or agents or justice system participants is TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS PER HOUR or portion thereof if being questioned, interrogated or in any way detained, harassed or otherwise regulated and TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS PER HOUR or portion thereof if I am handcuffed, transported, incarcerated or subjected to any adjudication process without my express written and Notarized consent. Furthermore I claim the universal maxim of law to wit; “the partner (government) of my partner (agent: JACKIE GRANT HARPER) is not my partner (Freeman-on-the-Land)” applies herein and is in full force and effect. Furthermore I claim the law of agent and principal applies and that service upon one is service upon both. Furthermore, I claim the right to use a Notary Public to secure payment of the aforementioned FEE SCHEDULE against any transgressors who by their actions or omissions harm me or my interests, directly or by proxy in any way. Furthermore, I claim the right to convene a proper court de jure in order to address any potentially criminal actions of any peace officers, government principals or agents or justice system participants who having been served notice of this claim fail to dispute or discuss or make lawful counterclaim and then interfere by act or omission with the lawful exercise of properly claimed and established rights and freedoms. Furthermore, I claim the right to deal with any counterclaims or disputes publicly and in an open forum using discussion and negotiation and to capture on video tape said discussion and negotiation for whatever lawful purpose as I see fit. Affected parties wishing to dispute the claims made herein or make their own counterclaims must respond appropriately within FOURTEEN (14) days of service of notice of this action. Reponses must be under Oath or attestation, upon full commercial liability and penalty of perjury and registered in the Notary Office herein provided no later than ___________________. Failure to register a dispute against the claims made herein will result in an automatic default judgement and permanent and irrevocable estoppel by acquiescence barring the bringing of charges under any statute or Act against Freeman-on-the-Land Jackie-Grant-Vel’oice: Harper. Place of claim of right: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada Dated: ___January 29, 2007________________ __________________________ Claimant [or claimant’s agent] Witness: Address Notary Public: ____________________ To register counterclaims and disputes: NOTARY PUBLIC ADDRESS ATTN: Freeman-on-the-Land _____Jackie-Grant-Vel’oice: Harper____________ Use of a Notary is for attestation and verification purposes and does not constitute adhesion, contract or change in status in any manner. All rights reserved without prejudice. Qui bene interrogat, bene docet. He who questions well, learns well. 3 Buls. 227. Qui bene distinguit, bene docet. He who distinguishes well, learns well. 2 Co. Inst. 470.
Posted on: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 00:56:52 +0000

Trending Topics



��नु मन लागे
REFRAINING FROM ABSTRACT TEACHINGS AND PREACHING ON SALVATION:
sharing didnt work for some reason, so I copy and pasted Patricia
Product HighLight: Does your Tacoma, FJ Cruiser, or 4Runner have

Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015