100 Reasons why Madeline McCann was not abducted PHYSICAL / APARTMENT / ENTRY 1. All five markers in a sample found under the tiles, behind the sofa (exactly where Eddie, the EVRD [Cadaver] dog and Keela, the CSI [Human Blood] dog, both indicated), are 100% compatible with Madeleines DNA profile 2. Fifteen of the markers, in a sample found under the luggage liner of the McCanns Scenic (hired 24 days later), are 100% compatible with Madeleines DNA profile 3. Shutters were not jemmied or forced, as claimed by the parents 4. No signs of forced entry anywhere in the apartment 5. No physical evidence of anyone having entered or left via the window, including: 6. No Lichen disturbance 7. No Fibres 8. No Finger prints of abductor 9. No footprints on bed 10. Only finger prints on the window are those of Kate SNIFFER DOGS DOGS 11. Eddie, the EVRD (Cadaver) dog, positively alerted to the McCanns wardrobe in 5A 12. Eddie, the EVRD (Cadaver) dog, positively alerted at the back of the sofa in 5A 13. Eddie, the EVRD (Cadaver) dog, positively alerted to the veranda outside the parent?s bedroom 14. Eddie, the EVRD (Cadaver) dog, positively alerted to the flower bed at the back of 5A 15. Eddie, the EVRD (Cadaver) dog, positively alerted to a white sleeveless top belonging to Kate 16. Eddie, the EVRD (Cadaver) dog, positively alerted to checked trousers belonging to Kate 17. Eddie, the EVRD (Cadaver) dog, positively alerted to a child?s red T shirt 18. Eddie, the EVRD (Cadaver) dog, positively alerted to a toy belonging to Madeleine 19. Eddie, the EVRD (Cadaver) dog, positively alerted to the key of the McCanns rental Scenic car 20. Eddie, the EVRD (Cadaver) dog, positively alerted to the passengers door of the McCanns Renault Scenic 21. Keela, the CSI (Human Blood) dog, positively alerted at the back of the sofa in 5A (exact same spot as alerted to by the EVRD dog) 22. Keela, the CSI (Human Blood) dog, positively alerted to the key of the McCanns hire car 23. Keela, the CSI (Human Blood) dog, positively alerted to the interior of the hire vehicles boot TANNER SIGHTING The only perceived evidence of abduction, being the sighting by Jane Tanner at around 21.15 is riddled with inconsistencies and conflicting testimonies, being the fact that 24. None of the scent tracking Search & Rescue dogs followed that trail, and in fact followed another trail completely 25. Jeremy Wilkins (independent witness) failed to spot the ?abductor?, despite being only yards away, while chatting to Gerry 26. Jeremy Wilkins (independent witness) failed to see Jane Tanner walking by, despite being on the same narrow sidewalk at the same time 27. Gerry himself failed to spot the abductor, despite being only yards away, while chatting to Jeremy 28. Gerry contradicted Jeremy by stating that their chat was on the opposite side of the road from that as described, and drawn on a map, by Mr Wilkins 29. Gerry also contradicted Tanner, by stating that his chat with Jeremy was on the opposite side of the road from that mentioned by Jane 30. Jane failed to spot the open window and shutters and blowing curtains coming from Madeleines bedroom while walking to her apartment at 21.15 31. Jane failed to spot the open window and shutters and blowing curtains coming from Madeleine?s bedroom while walking from her apartment at 21.20 32. Jane never bumped into Jeremy Wilkins (who had walked back to his apartment after the chat with Gerry) while walking back from her apartment at 21.20 33. Russell OBrien failed to spot the open window and shutters and blowing curtains coming from Madeleines bedroom while walking to his apartment at 21.30 34. Matthew Oldfield failed to spot the open window and shutters and blowing curtains coming from Madeleines bedroom while walking to his apartment, which was right next door, at 21.30 35. Matthew failed to spot the open window and shutters and blowing curtains while checking on Madeleine and the twins 36. Matthew failed to spot the open window and shutters and blowing curtains coming from Madeleines bedroom while walking from his apartment back to the Tapas at around 21.35 37. Jane failed to spot the open window and shutters and blowing curtains coming from Madeleines bedroom while walking to her apartment at 21.45 38. Russell failed to spot the open window and shutters and blowing curtains coming from Madeleines bedroom while walking back from his apartment at 21.50 39. Tanners description has changed several times 40. It makes no sense, especially if (as the McCanns claim) that this was a well planned abduction, that the abductor walks across the very road used by the parents to check on their children 41... The abductor failed to hear either Tanner, Gerry or Wilkins, and continued on the path that would put him in the full vision of all three 42... If the abductor had lifted Madeleine out of the bed, then he would be carrying with her head to his right hand side, not on the left as in Tanners claimed sighting SMITH SIGHTING 43. The Smith family (independent witnesses) sighting has, with the exception of one brief mention two years later, been completely ignored by the McCanns and their private detectives from day one (no e-fit / press conference / media onslaught) despite the fact that? 44. There was huge publicity given to the Tanner sighting, including the pressure put on the Portuguese authorities to get the details out there 45. The Smith family descriptions have never changed 46. The sighting was only minutes before the alarm was raised 47. The sighting was only 250 metres from the apartment 48. This sighting would have explained many of the inconsistencies of the Tanner sighting as mentioned above 49. There were several members of the family who witnessed this man carrying a child 50. The general area and timing of the sighting made by the family can be corroborated by a restaurant receipt for that evening 51. The general description of the man could fit Gerry McCann 52. The description of the child matches Madeleine 53. The type of trousers match those possessed by Gerry 54. Trousers match in terms of colour 55. Trousers even match in terms of the visible buttons as mentioned by one of the family 56. Martin and his wife later identified the carrier, through the distinctive carrying style, as being Gerry McCann Given much of the above, the remarkable coincidence that? 57. The pressure put on the PJ to highlight the Tanner sighting came at exactly the same time as the Smith family were being brought back to Portugal to go over the sighting in more detail 58. The sighting was in a different part of town from the Tanner sighting 59. It was also heading in a completely different direction 60. The carrying style was completely different to that of the Tanner sighting 61. And yet the McCanns deliberately altered the Smith sighting carrying style so as to match that of the Tanner sighting, during the only ever significant mention of the sighting, in a McCann made reconstruction aired only a few days after Amarals (in which he included the Smith sighting) 62. They also tried to morph the carrier into the same man as seen by Tanner, despite significant differences in descriptions BEHAVIOURAL There are many instances of strange behaviour from the McCanns, not being consistent with parents of a child abducted by paedophiles, including (but not limited to)? 63. Kate complaining about the speed of a police vehicle while being take to look into a new lead at PJ HQ (sighting caught on CCTV) 64. Gerry laughing and joking and sucking lollipops while one of the most significant abduction leads came to a climax 65. Very little mention of the huge award available over the last three years 66. Despite raising millions through their fund, and spending thousands on media monitoring, they continue to charge for travel kits and for printing off posters designed to help find their daughter 67. Lack of physical searching during the first few days 68. Lack of physically handing out leaflets / putting up posters themselves 69. Hiring cowboy private detectives with no expertise or experience in finding children 70. Gerry smirking when asked by a Sky News presenter how he feels when someone comes forward who is certain that they have seen Madeleine 71. When up to 14 possible sightings of Madeleine emerged in Malta, resulting in a huge police operation including Interpol, the McCanns hot footed it to Germany for more TV plugs 72. When the most promising sighting of all was made in Belgium, a 110% certain sighting by a child therapist, considered so credible by authorities that they despatched a forensics team, the McCanns went looking in Huelva, Spain 73. Gerrys initial claim, as overheard by another holidaymaker, within minutes of the alarm being raised, that Madeleine had been taken by paedophiles. How did he know that? 74. Gerry caught on Camera laughing his head off only a few days after his daughter had been abducted by paedophiles as claimed by the parents 75. Despite refuting the claims of the dogs / Scenic findings, the McCanns continued to submit ridiculous reasoning for them, including Sea bass, sweat, dirty nappies, rubbish en-route to dump, rotten meat, and attending to 6 bodies before the holiday, amongst others 76. Kate refusing to answer 48 police questions 77. The McCanns and their holiday friends all refusing to attend a police reconstruction 78. Despite the Madeleines disappearance looking like an inside job from the outset, the McCanns and their friends were happy enough returning their children to the MW creche just hours later, despite not knowing if any of the staff were involved 79. When Kate raised the alarm, she ran back to the table, leaving the twins in the apartment while not knowing whether the abductor(s) were still onsite 80. Kate shouting Theyve taken her!?, not distinguishing between Madeleine and her sister Amelie STATEMENT INCONSISTENCIES 90. When describing Madeleine sleeping that night, Kate said she was under the covers where as Gerry mentioned that his daughter slept without the covers, as was normal 91. Matthew Oldfield initially claimed that Kate and the children were at the tennis courts when he arrived there at 18.30 where as the rest of the Tapas 9 claim otherwise 92. David Paynes 18.30 / 18.40 check on Kate (last person out with the parents to see Madeleine) : According to Kate the sliding door was closed, and that David didnt actually enter the apartment, remaining at the door. But according to David, the door was open and he definitely entered the apartment. 93. Matt Oldfield chivvying up the Paynes at 21.00 : Matt claims he passed them near the top of the road, but David claims to have passed him by the swimming pool, Fiona claims to have passed him outside 5A, and Dianne Webster initially claimed that Matthew wasnt even there. 94. Prior to the PJ arriving at 12:40/12:50 Russell OBrien has written the timeline for them all, including, Jane tanner sees stranger walking carrying child. He does this while Gerry McCann sits at the same table. However, according to Jane Tanner its three o clock in the morning when she informs Gerry McCann for the first time OTHER MISCELLANEOUS EVIDENCE 95. Various other possible withheld evidence as hinted at, including intercepted phone calls / text messages 96. Independent witness statement (from McCann neighbour) regarding the luggage door of the McCanns hire vehicle being open morning, noon and night 97. Gerrys missing hold-all / tennis / kit bag which he was seen with the day Madeleine disappeared cannot be located by detectives 98. Gaspar (UK GPs) statements detailing concerns about the father and one of his friends on holiday with them 99. Yvonne Martin (Social Worker) statement regarding concerns about the same friend 100. This same friend calls the Metropolitan Police Crime Specialist Director (a number which is also used as the out of hours contact for the Mets Child Abuse Investigation Team) 24 hours after the alarm
Posted on: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 10:21:39 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015