About the “black hole” conception: Let begin with the nature of particle-antiparticle. All what we know about this phenomenon is that antiparticle is mirror image of respectively particle, but what is the essence nature of this dualism particle antiparticle? The answer comes from the essence of the field and polarization of the space in accordance with the USM kanevuniverse part I. Let see also page 195 to 198 USM where is given convincingly explanation of the nature question of antiparticle, which in summarizing fashion is the following: Antiparticle it is particle escaping from its own polarization space to the contrary one so quickly that there it isn’t tame to reverse its kinematic parameters, which immediately follows by annihilation. It is obviously that some form of common existence even in some not proved as a physical medium fantasy like a black hole it isn’t possible. Let remember again what should to be the black hole conception according to general relativity: Never forget the definition of black hole according to general relativity and it is place in the space where nothing can escape and anything stream in! Sensible person immediately ask you..where all these come in like masses, energies and soon, and you cannot give him reasonable answer…… What is the first: the revolving disc, which may hasn’t any mass, but which has tangential velocity and therefore bend the space around itself, or the spherical mass which has or hasn’t tangential velocity but we accuse that this mass bend the space and creates the so called space time curvilinear tensor? Gravity is dynamically characterization (centripetal acceleration) but the bending is kinematical characterization, so obviously we must to remind again the following: Brian, it’s OK! All of us I believe know very well special theory of relativity and of course the general one, but these theories are correct about the time when they wеre invented by Einstein and especially if I may to use the word of Einstein himself (how it is possible of course), he very much doubt about the problem with the absolute space existence. He approximate said that if the space is distances between the objects only, that doesn’t obstruct the existence of the absolute space, and it for the time was correct. By then the essence of the field, that he accepted, it is the bending of the space only and these bending can organize through some tensor of deformations. For that the general theory of relativity needs absolute space, because the effect of member √(1-v^2/c^2 ) is very weak if the velocity is between the two close objects. Einstein said the following: If we have one revolving disc and if we put tangentially on the periphery a meter length, then this meter will shrink according to the member above, but if we put this meter at the radius it remain the same. So if we divide the perimeter by the diameter of this disc we cannot obtain the number (π). That is why the space is bending, but to be possible this bending to explain the quantity of the gravitational field, there is needed velocity close to the velocity of light, which practically is very rarely on the Universe. So Einstein proposes the following experiment: He said if we have one flat table and if begin to arrange safety matches in square form and if we shifting a little one of them, the difference will be insignificant, but if we continues with the arrangement endlessly then the bending will be so big that the curvet line can close into the circuit. So Einstein is needs endless absolute space independently existing, where act the physical processes. The connections between the times, also is known, but there is importantly that the times to have common beginning. So let pass towards the theory USM kanevuniverse Namely from part I and part II it is seen that the distances between the cell of the matter, which is the orbital system, is equilibrium between the centripetal and centrifugal forces and this movement creates the field itself: g=±(v.c)/r ln(1±v/c) . So if these forces absent then the space disappears, because the field disappears and because of that the masses also disappear. So remains nothing, which (if You read the theory) passes into absolute nothing. So the absolute space doesn’t exist. Now about the times: If You read the theory You can see the coefficient of connection between the times in the two most close spaces, for instance Our space and Subspace, and this coefficient is equal to:〖10〗^31 folds. So when in our space passes one second in the subspace passes 〖10〗^31 seconds. So in the subspace there are 〖10〗^31 beginnings……. Where is the common beginning about the two times? Obviously the time in the USM is quantity of movement like multiplication between force (which means acceleration or the same field) and passed road and obviously the time it isn’t real dimension, but because of the thickening of the micro cosmos and expanding of the macro cosmos this quantity of movement does represent the energy and this coincides with the essence of the time in general theory of relativity. But let’s stop here because the lecture becomes very long. Other and many more in: kanevuniverse Yours G. Kanev Obviously such thing like black hole cannot exist physically, because conception of point where the centripetal attraction can be endlessly is mathematically related but not physical phenomenon, because there is disturbed at least the rule of energy preservation. So what is the essence of greatness attraction forces in some point of the universe where we indeed observe such phenomena? The answer is in USM kanevuniverse and especially material called supmaterial which can create the joromachine kanevuniverse see the density (gravity) and possibility of common magnetic moment! G.Kanev
Posted on: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 12:20:11 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015