Accuracy matters. It is refinement. Better descriptions are available when we have processed information over longer periods of time, and worked with it in a dynamic manner. Stephen Hubbell once told me that I was accurate, he thanked me for it. I hadnt thought about it much until then, beyond my own infatuation with being precise, but it changes perspectives. Every word matters. So, today Ive tracked down a description that we can do away with completely. Objective reality and Subjective reality to describe the nature of all things and our personal nature. These are inaccurate. The real definitions are collective reality and individuated reality. In both cases it refers to consciousness, an idea. But the first set, objective and subjective, have problems. 1) They are mutually exclusive . .you cannot be one AND the other. 2) They are static . . unchanging. 3) Objective implies truth . .and possibly God in a singular term . . rather than a shared view of co-created truth or a shared idea of divine energy. 4) Subjective means from the inside of us, looking out . .a single perspective also, which denies the idea of empathy, and shared energy and thought. 5) They are seen to be specifically sentient and organic functions, which means that we cannot have a subjective star or planet unless we change the words. 6) There is no movement from one to the other, even in the death of the body. We are a collective Universe, and we as sentient consciousness are individuated realities. No more Objective and Subjective. We are collective and individuated. Consciousness, reality, soul, whatever we want to call it, there is movement and shared experience from one to the other. There are better words.
Posted on: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 16:28:01 +0000
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015