Avadhut Joshi, Room No.202, Aviraj Lodge, 11, Mrutyunjaya Colony, Karve Road, Pune -411029 Mobile- +91 8806712048 avadhut2012@rediffmail 20 Sept 14 To The H’ble Prime Minister of India (Who so ever receives this e-mail for the H’ble authorities; kindly give proper attention to my request and communicate to the H’ble Authorities at the earliest. The subject of the e-mail must have made you aware of the nature and gravity of the issue.) (Copy submitted with respect to the President, VP, H’ble Home Minister and Law Minister, President of BJP on behalf of NDA, President of INC on behalf of UPA, Presidents of other parties and to SHRI P. SREEDHARAN for forwarding to H’ble Prime Minister and to all H’ble MPs for information and necessary action also) Sub- 1) Request Number sixteen regarding ‘SEOMWIGS’ 2) Further Injustice in court cases 3) our dream for ‘United India and Great India’ Ref- 1) My Request No. 15 dated 12 Sept 14 and all other references mentioned in it Respected Sir I was to continue the same subject of Buddha and his Dhamma. However after reading some material about Dr.Ambedkarji, I changed my opinion. In last 2-3 days, I read about the defeat of Dr.Babasaheb Ambedkaraji in 1946 and 1951 Loksabha elections. I had also referred about his defeat in my request on 23rd Aug 14. I expressed my surprise over his defeat as everything about him is ‘THE BEST’. He had blame- less character, no corruption, no cheating, and he was revolutionary and what to say about his intelligence and knowledge. No one says a single bad word for him where as all the Gandhis, Neharus, Patels, Sawarkars, RSS etc. face some sort of criticism from some sector of the society. In my life I never heard any leader criticizing him. I never read anything bad about him. This is not that much true. To be frank I read very less about him. I had simple logic. The person he has burned ‘Manusmruti’ must be a poor intellectual and thoughtless person. Hence I avoided any material by him or by his followers to save my valuable time. At the same time, I never spoke a single bad word about him. It is a genuine fact. Again there was same logic, when entire society is praising him, my intuition and belief with ‘Manusmruti’ theory was probably wrong. So I never spoke on him. My opinion was against him only and not against the lower caste communities. I was always friendly with them. It might be due to the environment in which I was grown up. My father was a Sanitary Inspector in government service and there were so many persons from lower castes as his staff. They used to come at our home, sometimes for reporting and for work. My parents were very much friendly with them. Our kitchen was a place for them for having tea, and by authority. My mother was a person for some ladies for sharing their problems. There was one sweeper (Bhangi) and his son was a very good carom player. He used to come for playing. He was my partner in local tournaments. I continued the same approach in my government service also. All this communication is my first ever expression on Dr.Ambedkarji. For this, communication, I started reading his creations and also the creations by others on similar topics. The more; I am reading, I am really scared. Dr.Ambedkarji and Fuleji, Fuleji is also outcome of Ambedkarji. Otherwise, the Fule supporters had closed the so called ‘Satyashodhak Samaj’. Normal human beings can not live with such type of hatred. Sustained hatred is a special and rare quality and we will find it in very few individuals. I have left aside the ‘Buddha and his Dhamma book’ due to the election defeat of Dr.Ambedkarji in Loksabha election of 1951 and again in by- election. The defeats are not important. In election one is supposed to win and others are supposed to loose. The most concerning part is the response from the top politicians of India and followers of Dr.Ambedkarji. After reading all such material, I have made a firm opinion. Dr.Ambedkarji and Fuleji, this pair is a strong wall between ‘happiness and lower caste communities.’ Till their theories are alive, the lower caste communities will always remain unhappy and dissatisfied. As lower caste communities are a part of our society and a major constituent, we can not afford this. No nation can afford it. No nation can survive happily with such unrest. And hence I am against their theories. The Hindu society, has a history of say 6000 years and with out any major revolt. It is an indication and evidence that the ‘Fule-Ambedkar theories are false and were formed for their vested interest under guidance of British rulers. I am trying to explain the reasons and I will prefer to take help of thoughts of Dr.Ambedkarji. Please refer the quote number 97 from the web page enclosed.( Dr. Ambedkar Quotes _ AMBEDKARISM) Heroes and hero-worship is a hard fact in India’s political life. I agree that hero-worship is demoralizing for the devotee and dangerous to the country. I welcome the criticism so far as it conveys the caution that you must know your man is really great before you start worshipping him. This unfortunately is not an easy task. For in these days with the Press in hand it is easy to manufacture Great Men. Carlyle used a happy phrase when he described the Great Men of history as so many bank notes. Like bank notes they represent gold. What we have to see that they are not forged notes. I admit that we ought to be more cautious in our worship of Great Men. For in this country we have arrived at such a stage when alongside the notice boards saying “Beware of pickpockets”, we need to have notice boards saying “Beware of Great Men”. Even Carlyle who defended the worship of Great Men warned his readers how: “Multitudes of Great Men have figured in history who were false and selfish “. We can follow this thought of Dr.Ambedkarji. As it is good and proper, there is every possibility that it must be there in some book. So as per suggestion of Dr.Ambedkarji, let us evaluate his status as champion of everything and the greatest hero ever born in India. These are the academic achievements of Dr.Ambedkarji. It includes BA,MA,MSC,DSC,Ph.D and law. Now let us evaluate his success with his own theories. (Refer 1 Ambedkarji Academic achievements) Ambedkaraji took birth, then studied and enlighten his community and entire nation. Till this thing happened, the Brahmin/Hindu culture was hurdle in development of his community. He destroyed this hurdle and opened a path of progress for his community. He gave us most sacred principles of equality, freedom and brotherhood. Let us take equality. Dr.Ambedkar and his brother faced same environment. Ambedkaraji touched such height and his brother could not do anything as compared to him. Who is at fault for being unsuccessful? Whether his brother is at fault or the circumstances? We can not blame the circumstances as circumstances were same for both. The logical answer is his brother. So what about equality? As per equality principle, his brother should have achieved the same success. In other words, we can conclude that the principle of equality is wrong and there are different potentials in different persons even though they are real brothers and grown up in same environment. Take case of his son. Dr.Ambedkar gave him best school, best facilities. An exceptional talent like Dr.Ambedkar was available for him at home. What was the result? His son was total failure. Who is at fault? Now there is improvement in circumstances. In other words, we reach to same conclusion. Whatever success is there, it should be earned with our own efforts. What philosophy Fule-Ambedkar has generated? It is a simple theory. For failures, blame Brahmins and Hindu religion. When undue advantages are to be extracted, push caste. And still the entire nation is supposed to say……………Dr.Ambedkarji destroyed castes. Let us check his intelligence and his perception/interpretation power. This man is treated as an authority for the 6000 year history of world. I am not using the word ‘World’ by mistake. Whenever we term something as bad, we definitely require some reference of good. Ambedkarji proved/declared that Hindu religion was worst in all religions. The Hindu culture was worst in world. So both the things will require knowledge of everything. This is from part 5 of the book ‘Buddha and his Dhamma’. The part 5 is enclosed. 1. The Bhikkhus Duty to Convert 1 The news of the conversion of Yasa and his four friends to the Dhamma spread far and wide. The result was that lay persons belonging to the highest families in the country and to those next to the highest came to be instructed in the doctrine of the Blessed One and to take refuge in Him and in His Dhamma...... 6. And before sending them out the Blessed One said to the Bhikkhus: I am delivered, 0 Bhikkhus, from all fetters, human and divine. You, 0 Bhikkhus, from all fetters, human and divine. Go ye now, and wander for the gain of the many, for the welfare of the many, out of compassion for the world; for the good, for the gain and for the welfare of gods and men. (Please refer 2 Welfare of gods and men) Buddha is teaching to Bhikkus. He is advising them for following his instructions for the welfare of gods and men. 1. Buddhas Conception of What a Bhikkhu Should Be A Bhikkhu who, though he receives little, does not despise what he has received, even the gods will praise him, if his life is pure, and if he is not slothful. II. He who never identifies himself with name and form, and does not grieve over what is no more, he indeed is called a Bhikkhu. (Please refer 3 Gods will praise him.) Here Buddha is telling Bhikkus that if they follow his instructions, even the gods will praise them. Now the next thing will give correct measure of intelligence of Dr.Ambedkarji. The Bhikkhu and the Brahmin 1. Is the Bhikkhu the same as the Brahmin ? The answer to this question is also in the negative. 2. The discussion of the subject has not been concentrated at any one place. It is scattered all over. But the points of distinction can be easily summed up. 3. A Brahmin is a priest. His main function is to perform certain ceremonies connected with birth, marriage and death. 4. These ceremonies become necessary because of the doctrines of original sin which requires ceremonies to wash it off, and because of the belief in God and in Soul. 5. For these ceremonies a priest is necessary. A Bhikkhu does not believe in original sin, in God and Soul. There are, therefore, no ceremonies to be performed. He is, therefore, not a priest. (Please refer 4 Bhikku does not believe in god) Here Dr.Ambedkarji is telling the difference between a Bhikku and a Brahmin and he is also emphasizing that a Bhikku is superior to a Brahmin. Sir! With in a span of few pages of his own book, we can find Buddha telling to take care of welfare of gods. We can find Buddha telling to Bhikkus for following good behavior so that even gods will praise them. We can find that a Bhikku is not a believer of god. At the beginning of the book we can find that Buddha was not a believer of god. Is there any existence of intelligence and knowledge? Is there any rationality? Is the writing is logical? It is only an expression of a big fool and we are treating him as an authority of the 6000 year history of the world. The example which I have given is not limited to this much. This one example can give a lot of information about Dr.Ambedkarji. Apart from this example I have shown so many ridiculous facts of Ambedkarji philosophy with examples from this book. However most important issue is altogether different and it is about loyalty and faith. In our life, we always remain loyal with some person, some philosophy. We keep faith in some religion, god or saint. Sometimes we deviate from philosophy. Sometime we deviate from the noble advice or sacred principles. But whenever we do so, we feel guilt. Sometimes we can express, sometimes we can not express. Generally this happens in our dynamic life. The circumstances, pressure of the situation force us to do so. But such excuse is not available while writing a book and that to a book on Gautam Buddha. Why Dr.Ambedkarji did such blunders in his book? There can be two reasons/possibilities. 1) He was not at all an admirer of Gautam Buddha or his philosophy. Had he been involved and devoted to Buddha philosophy, he would have never made such blunder. When there is devotion, a devotion which we acquire after our own thinking and study, it remains in our brain for ever. We can not forget it for a second also. But Dr.Ambedkarji had made blunders at various times, while writing a book and when there was no any dynamic pressure of the real life situation. Conclusion- His love for Buddha and his philosophy was drama. For him Buddha philosophy was a medium for using against Hinduism. For him Buddha philosophy was a medium for instigating the lower caste people and diverting them for being loyal to him/British government. 2) In my opinion, the first was reason. This is possibility. Dr.Ambedkarji had created a lot of written material. His academic achievements are spectacular. In addition to this, he was in a profession like politics. Politicians, especially top politicians can understand the busy schedule when there is an event like election. The pre-independence period was like ‘Election period’. It was not limited to few months. Everyday was crucial and hectic. Everyday was a busy day. Until freedom was achieved, there was no leisure period for the leaders. Though Dr.Ambedkar had nothing to do with freedom struggle, as a counter party of the freedom moment, he must have to follow the same schedule like freedom fighters. In addition to this, he was supposed to take care of interests of lower caste people. How this man could spare so much of time for such huge volume of written material? The range of his subjects and the references given by him are mind boggling. The world has seen so many great authors. They took years together for writing one book. Dr.Ambedkarji wrote like a printing press. I strongly suspect that some one was supplying him the material and he was publishing in his name. Or he was simply copying it from available sources. Sir! You just read the riddles about Hinduism…..you read the book ‘Who were Shudras’. People have spent their entire life on studying some part of those references. It is not that these people were incompetent. But competence of Dr.Ambedkarji on this front is suspicious. It becomes more suspicious when we observe that his writing full with contradictions to his own thoughts expressed somewhere. When everything comes out from one brain, one thought process, there should be no contradictions and opposite views. Whenever such thing happens genuinely, the person explains his stand for the opposite view. Such thing is not there with Dr.Ambedkarji. Genuine involvement, faith, loyalty, love, affection are far more important things than intelligence. With genuine involvement, we do not miss even small things. I can give my own example. On 17th Sept 14, I went to internet café. I wanted to wish you. I registered myself on the ‘Interact with PM’ facility. I opened up the page and saw that the interaction option was available under head of ‘Query’. I was in puzzle. Should I wish you or should I give up my thought? Wishing for birthday under head ‘Query’ is foolishness. At the same time, I had strong urge for wishing. After struggle, I convinced myself that I would wish you and I would also complain for the wrong design of options for interaction. After that I submitted my ‘Query’ with confidence. But after coming back, for two days, I was restless. I had strong feeling of guilt. I strongly felt that my logic was wrong. I should not have convinced myself with ‘system lacuna’. Finally I decided to rely on you with hope that you will forgive me. But the option of query is totally wrong. Why a citizen should interact with you for his query? Are you a prime minister or ‘RTI’ officer? A citizen is supposed to request you. A citizen is supposed to submit some information to you. A citizen is supposed to suggest some modification/idea/new approach for betterment of the system. A citizen can express his love for you. Why the system is forcing us for putting up a query? Ok! Let us evaluate the competence of Dr.Ambedkarji as a lawyer. Let us take the same example of Buddha. Dr.Ambedkarji told that Buddha was not a believer of god. He also told that Buddha taught Bhikkus for following his principles for having praise from god. Let us transfer the same example as a court case. Suppose a customer of Dr.Ambedkarji is charged for beating someone under influence of liquor. If Dr.Ambedkarji, as lawyer, On one working day of the case, told that his customer do not consume liquor. On the next date of the case, Dr.Ambedkarji told that his customer consumes 2 full bottles of liquor everyday. What will happen in the case? What the client will think about his lawyer? Is it not similar to Buddha and his denial for gods? Sir! Writing a book is also like advocating some thought. Can we treat Dr.Ambedkarji as a great lawyer? Take the case of his constitution. He even did not change the initiation date of the laws. Still our laws have initiation date of British rule. And as a legal issue, this is grave mistake. This is blunder. Why we praise him for giving some thing great thing like constitution? I have read and heard so much about those principles…‘Equality, Freedom and brotherhood’. Dr.Ambedkarji gave something great. Do you know about his thought on equality? Please refer the quote number 82. Equality may be a fiction but nonetheless one must accept it as a governing principle. Sir! There is no doubt that his concept of equality was/is fiction. It is simply stupidity. How and why this man designed a system based on fiction? Sir! We all understand the difference between a fiction and real life. For a real life, we must have system based on reality and not the fiction. And that is why I am requesting you all to dump ‘Fule-Ambedkarji’. All their theories are not reality. It is entirely fiction. And we everyone knows that fiction can never take place of reality. That is why I am telling that this pair is a hurdle for the happiness of lower caste people. Fule-Ambedkar had given a perpetual sorrow to the lower caste people. No human can forgive for 5000-6000 year cheating. No human can forgive suppression of 5000-6000 years. With whatever gain, the lower caste people will always remain dissatisfied. They will always remain unhappy. The only remedy for overcoming their sorrow and unhappiness is in dumping this pair. Bring the truth in front of the entire nation. Ask them to apply a common sense and evaluate the idiotic theories. We can help them on that front with proper logics and evidences. I can give one such evidence. And this evidence is the reason for giving up the subject of the book on Lord Buddha. Dr.Ambedkar’s schedule caste federation lost March 1946 provincial assembly elections in a bad way. Here is some data on the first Loksabha elections. Please refer the web page Indian general election, 1951 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. The total valid votes in the election were 205,944,495. There were two republican parties who got 0.04 and 0.05 % votes. So the total comes as 185350. Out of these 185350 votes, share of Dr.Ambedkarji was 123576. That means other candidates of the Republican parties earned only 61774 votes. There is no data on seats contested. But if the number is less, it means, he was not influential for entering in to the election on large scale. If the number of seats contested, it is an indication of very poor performance. Now let us apply the beloved logic of all politicians and equality concept of Dr.Babasaheb Ambedkarji. What is the beloved logic of all politicians for the defeated party/leader? People denied them or people denied the party. What is the beloved logic for winner party? People supported us and gave ‘Jandesh’. Now let us apply equality principle to Dr.Ambedkarji. Conclusion- People denied him. People denied his party. People denied his ‘philosophy of hatred’. People ordered for dumping this architect of constitution out of parliament. Dr.Ambedkaraji lost some by election also. I have no specific data on it. But he was on number two in first election. In by election he was pushed to number three by people. Conclusion as per politicians- People strongly told to dump the rampant caste spirit and zero brotherhood, out of parliament. After donating the brotherhood through constitution, Dr.Ambedkarji’s stock of brotherhood was nil. So the lower caste people also preferred other candidates with brotherhood in practice and not mere bubbles of word. It is bad luck of the nation that no politician heard and obeyed the ‘Janadesh’ given by the people of his time. Sir! Today what we understand about past is from documents. But in these two elections, people were first hand witness of the events. Dr.Ambedkarji was in position to influence the people. Even if we agreed the usual ..bla.. bla bla of cheating by Congress, still one question remains. What was done by the most talented, intelligent person ever born on our soil? Other than Brahmins, all must be happy with him as he exposed the 5000-6000 year cheating by Brahmins. Hence as per Dr.Ambedkarji, we must understand our hero. Whether the person is a hero or a villain? Sir! I have also read few documents on the March 1946 election story. I need some more information and hence I would continue this election subject in my next request. However I am in puzzle on two fronts. One, no document gives the issues involved in his election. In 1951, he was defeated by a simple ‘Makhkhanvala’ Narayan Sadoba Kajrolkar. Why the politicians do not give the beloved title of ‘Giant Killer’ to him? Why all the guns, extinguish with name of Dr.Ambedkarji? Please read Dr.Ambedkar’s opinion on politicians/rulers of India. Quote number 86 There can be no gain saying that political power in this country has too long been the monopoly of the few, and the many are not beasts of burden but also beasts of prey. And as per Dr.Ambedkar, Brahmins were never a political power. And the many must include the ‘Hindutvavadi’. Please refer the functions of a Brahmin as given by Dr.Ambedkarji. Refer ‘4 Bhikku does not believe in god. The Bhikkhu and the Brahmin 1. Is the Bhikkhu the same as the Brahmin ? The answer to this question is also in the negative. 2. The discussion of the subject has not been concentrated at any one place. It is scattered all over. But the points of distinction can be easily summed up. 3. A Brahmin is a priest. His main function is to perform certain ceremonies connected with birth, marriage and death. So as per Dr.Ambedkarji, main function of a Brahmin was to perform ceremonies. But at least they were not in power. Hence I have few more questions to the Fule-Ambedkar followers. How they looted the 90% Bahujan Samaj for 5000-6000 years? Did they were charging each and every penny to their customers and making them bankrupt? If so, why the customers were giving it? And the answer must be a practical one also. Dr.Ambedkarji has given us a tool of practicability for assessing the things. I will continue the subject of his elections. However it is my sincere request for a national reading of Manusmruti. All the things have been initiated from Manusmruti. So let us clarify our beloved lower caste communities. Let us take a first step for removing their sorrow. Let us have one step towards our dream of ‘One India and great India’. And kindly remember my personal issues also. Thanking you Yours faithfully Avadhut Joshi
Posted on: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 15:31:00 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015