Because this analysis i s subject to a “functional approach,” - TopicsExpress



          

Because this analysis i s subject to a “functional approach,” this Court must deter mine the nature of the function performed to assess whether immunit y is proper . Koubriti v. Convertino , 593 F.3d 459, 467 (6th Cir. 2010) (citing Burns v. Ree d , 500 U.S. 478, 486 (1991); Forrester v. W hite , 484 U.S. 219, 229 (1988)) . Dea n and Carley bear the burden of demonstrating that their actions are an “‘integral part of the judicial process’ or . . . are ‘intimately associate d with the judicial process’” in order to claim absolute immunity . Id. (quoting Imbler v. Pachtman , 424 U.S. 409, 430 (1976)) . By contrast, only qualified immunity is available for prosecutors’ actions that are “investigative or administrative in n at u re , because they are more remove d from the judicial process.” Id. (internal quotation marks omitted).
Posted on: Sun, 28 Dec 2014 23:25:32 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015