Hey everybody, I have an amendment I want to propose but I would - TopicsExpress



          

Hey everybody, I have an amendment I want to propose but I would really like input on it. Im sure everybody has noticed by now that 6th gen has a bit of a disconnect problem. Weve mostly managed to work things out ourselves this term but I think it is important that we have an established way of deciding what we do in these situations. The unfortunate part about it is that it is incredibly difficult to create a rule that will be fair 100% of the time, so my goal is to get as close as possible to that. My problem is that Im not sure what the best way to do that is and thats why I need your advice. How do you think we should decide the outcome of a disconnect? Creative solutions welcome, the more complex a rule probably the more fair it will be. Just a few ideas: Person with the most remaining pokemon wins, sudden death (of some sort) if equal number of pokemon. Restart the battle from the beginning Combine the first two so that a disconnect early in the battle leads to a restart, but a late game disconnect would be decided by remaining pokemon. (once a player has lost 3 pokemon it would be considered late in the game) The person who disconnected losses (this is what Nintendo uses but personally I dont like it since its generally not the persons fault that they disconnected) redo the battle but only with remaining pokemon (probably my favorite solution so far but it still doesnt account for battle conditions at all) redo the battle with only the remaining pokemon that had at least 50% health (tries to at least partially address the previous suggestions flaw, although I fear it is just as likely if not more so of creating an unfair situation.) Those are most of the possibilities I could come up with, please let me know which is best or propose your own solution.
Posted on: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 17:27:32 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015