I highly suggest reading this WSJ piece from tomorrows edition. I think it not only well written but very insightful and very telling looking ahead; this has only just begun: Welcome to the 19th Century Putin and the new Bonapartes see a weak and retreating West. . . . . March 16, 2014 6:41 p.m. ET You just dont in the 21st century behave in 19th century fashion by invading another country on completely trumped up pretext, declared John Kerry on March 2 as Russia began its conquest of Ukraines Crimean peninsula. Though he didnt intend it, the U.S. Secretary of State was summing up the difference between the current leaders of the West who inhabit a fantasy world of international rules and the hard men of the Kremlin who understand the language of power. The 19th-century men are winning. *** Vladimir Putin consolidated his hold on Crimea Sunday by forcing a referendum with only two choices. Residents of the Ukrainian region could vote either to join Russia immediately or to do so eventually. The result was a foregone conclusion, midwifed by Russian troops and anti-Ukraine propaganda. Russias Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov dismissed Mr. Kerrys pleas for restraint on Friday in London, and Russia vetoed a U.N. Security Council resolution denouncing the Crimean takeover a day later. European Pressphoto Agency Next up for conquest may be eastern Ukraine. Russian troops are massed on the border, and on Saturday its soldiers and helicopter gunships crossed from Crimea and occupied a natural gas plant on the Ukrainian mainland. Scuffles and demonstrations in the eastern Ukrainian cities of Donetsk and Kharkiv, egged on by Russian agitators, could create another trumped up pretext. And what is to stop Mr. Putin? In the two weeks since Russian troops occupied Crimea, President Obama and Europe have done little but threaten consequences that Mr. Putin has little reason to take seriously. The U.S. has refused Ukraines request for urgent military aid, and it has merely sent a few NATO planes to the Baltic states and Poland. The Russian strongman might figure hes better off seizing more territory now and forcing the West to accept his facts on the ground. All the more so given that his domestic popularity is soaring as he seeks to revive the 19th-century Russian empire. Left in shambles are the illusions of Mr. Obama and his fellow liberal internationalists. They arrived at the White House proclaiming that the days of U.S. leadership had to yield to a new collective security enforced by the international community. The U.N. would be the vanguard of this new 21st-century order, and international law and arms-control treaties would define its rules. Thus Mr. Obamas initial response to Mr. Putins Crimean invasion was to declare, like Mr. Kerry, that it is illegal because it violates the Ukrainian constitution and international law. As if Mr. Putin cares. The 19th-century men understand that what defines international order is the cold logic of political will and military power. With American power in retreat, the revanchists have moved to fill the vacuum with a new world disorder. Backed by Iran and Russia, Bashar Assad is advancing in Syria and may soon crush the opposition. Iran is arming the terrorist militias to the north and south of Israel. China is pressing its regional territorial claims and building its military. And Mr. Putin is blowing apart post-Cold War norms by carving up foreign countries when he feels he can. The question now is whether Mr. Obama and his advisers will shed their 21st-century fantasies and push back against the new Bonapartes. Jimmy Carter finally awoke after the Soviets invaded Afghanistan, but Mr. Obama hasnt shown the same awareness of what is happening on his watch. Weve written about the need for broad economic and financial sanctions against Russia and its elites. Skeptics reply that Europe will never go along. Even if thats true—and that would mean a failure of U.S. diplomacy—it shouldnt deter the U.S. from imposing its own banking and financial sanctions. The worlds banks can be made to face a choice between doing business with Russia or doing business in America. We know from the Bush Administrations experience with North Korea that such sanctions bite. The West must also meet Mr. Putins military aggression with a renewed military deterrent. This does not mean a strike on Russia or invading Crimea. It should mean offering military aid to Ukraine to raise the price of further Russian intervention. Above all it means reinforcing NATO to show Mr. Putin that invading a treaty ally would lead to war. The U.S. and Europe should move quickly to forward deploy forces to Poland, the Baltic states and other front-line NATO nations. This should include troops in addition to planes and armor. Reviving an updated version of the Bush-era missile defense installation in Eastern Europe is also warranted, including advanced interceptors that could eventually be used against Russian ICBMs. Russias revanchism should also finally awaken Europeans to spend more on their own defense. The 19th-century men know that nationalism isnt dead as a mobilizing political force. Western Europes leaders will have to relearn this reality or their dreams of European peace will be shattered. They need more modern arms of their own in addition to Americas through NATO. In response to the Crimean referendum Sunday, the White House issued a statement declaring that, In this century, we are long past the days when the international community will stand quietly by while one country forcibly seizes the territory of another. We shall see, but Mr. Obama first needs to understand that Americas adversaries reject his fanciful 21st-century rules.
Posted on: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 01:57:29 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015