It is not racist to promote a change of character from white man - TopicsExpress



          

It is not racist to promote a change of character from white man to black man...it might be cynical (in terms of marketing, publicity, hope for a sales surge), but it aint racist. Its called Representation.. We dont need to create new characters and books in this uneasy market in order to give representation to white men and women, and if we do, the failure of those books is seen as a failure of the market not the colour, gender identification (we-ell...), religion of the characters. We all know how difficult it is to establish new books. Publishers will continue to try new books with white men and white women. But if a new book with characters other than a white hero fails, everyone announces, The market is not ready for fill-in-the-blank-of-the-difference. The attitude behind these books (and many imprints) is that the readership will reflect that of the lead characters...ie, that comics about females will be read only by females, that comics about POCs will be read only by POCS. The expectation is that those groups must not currently be reading comics (or why would they ask for representation of themselves, and not simply be happy with what they get). When these books (and imprints) fail the publishers announce, Those groups arent interested in supporting comics that represent them. The expectations for these books are set higher than those for books of white characters. Every day, as I read comics, as I watch movies and tv shows, I am struck by the lack of representation of those who are not white. I notice when characters are other--and if their roles are as real people or mere plot points and tropes. It bothers me deeply to not see a world that reflects the one I live in. I am bothered by the argument that were talking about superheroes and aliens and mythical characters--that creators imaginations are so limited that they imagine fantastical people only as versions of white. Theres a reality to the fact that established characters are established characters and have a built-in readership and acceptance. So, it is somewhat easier for a publisher to take a chance...to say lets see how this sells, knowing that they can change back to the original character if the sales falter. It is cynical, yes. Its also a smart business move in the real world of comic book economics. However much some might howl and roar, many who like the established character will announce that they will grudgingly read the new character arc...and many will come to like that character. If that happens, publishers think, So...people WILL accept characters who arent white, arent just male? And slowly, comics might edge to a little more representation of the world in which the readers live...a world with People of Colour, queer and trans people, and--dare we say it?!--women. And in a world of cynical marketing ploys, PR departments do their jobs and get news of these character changes out into the real world, the one where people still think of comics as Zap Pow BANG!, as only for children. As I take note of ALL the articles talking about a black Captain America, the incredible number talking about a woman as Thor, I am aware that people who might not normally walk into a comic book shop are starting to wonder if there might be more to comics than they previously thought...and that theyre wondering if they, or their kids might see themselves represented in those books.
Posted on: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 15:19:38 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015